School shooting message: life is not safe

Does anyone one really believe that society can stop a random mass killing by banning an inanimate object? FOR REALS??? By random, it’s random for us, it is planned by the killer.

Do you honestly think shooting 4 people at a school is worse then stabbing 4 people at a school, or running over 4 people at a school? If so, you are kind of a twisted human.

Is it, all of them freightened you but you need to think you can at least control something, anything?

On the flip side, do you really think that arming teachers will stop a random act of killing. This kids will just move their targets from school to the bus. Rifles would be the wrong choice for the bus. So then do you arm bus drivers? The killers will hit their target before/after school, or at any school function that’s not in school grounds.

If a sick * ats edit* really wants to commit a mass killing, you are probably not going to stop it.

You know what might have stopped it. If any of those kids making the media tour asked the kid: how’s your day; I like that outfit, where did you get that; having a big game of pick up football, you want in; and so on

Has the media ever asked the blue checked Twitter kids, how did they interact with the killer?

Future ideas for the next president

Virtual classrooms, everyone sitting at home.. protected in the basement.
All weapons banned from civilian hands
Cameras on every street corner.
Trackers on every person born, gps and id.
Mental evaluation of every person once every 5 years. ( put into cat, green-blue and red

Safety is an illusion.

originally posted by: SocratesJohnson
Do you honestly think shooting 4 people at a school is worse then stabbing 4 people at a school, or running over 4 people at a school? If so, you are kind of a twisted human.

Do you think you would have the ability to stab to death 17 people as easily as you can shoot 17 people?

Arguments like yours only emboldens the people fighting to ban guns.

Nobody is saying banning assault rifles will stop all violence.

However banning assault rifles can and will stop most assault rifle related violence.

originally posted by: SaturnFX

originally posted by: SocratesJohnson
Do you honestly think shooting 4 people at a school is worse then stabbing 4 people at a school, or running over 4 people at a school? If so, you are kind of a twisted human.

Do you think you would have the ability to stab to death 17 people as easily as you can shoot 17 people?

Arguments like yours only emboldens the people fighting to ban guns.

And yes, shooting 4 people is worse than stabbing 4 people. You get stabbed, there's a very good chance you will survive with zero long term health problems.

You get shot by an assault rifle? You're probably dead. If you survive, you've probably lost the limb you were hit in.

So yes. Shooting is worse than stabbing. Ask any doctor.

I did not think people needed the example of school shootings to know that life is not safe.Most of the people murdered in my country would have wished for the mercy of just being shot.There are much much worse ways to die.

originally posted by: Painterz
Nobody is saying banning assault rifles will stop all violence.

However banning assault rifles can and will stop most assault rifle related violence.

Actually, what the gun banning crowd is pushing for is a ban on semi-automatic weapons that look a certain way. Hunting rifles with the exact same functionality will be OK. We have yet to have a single actual "assault rifle" used in a mass shooting. Oh sorry, since Feb 14, 1929.

Hand guns will not be touched, nor will the high-capacity mags you can buy for them.

So what we really just need to do is ban school shootings and everything will be ok.

Or possibly just ban stupid people, which will decimate the ranks of the Democratic party and then things will be OK.

originally posted by: SaturnFX
Do you think you would have the ability to stab to death 17 people as easily as you can shoot 17 people?

Arguments like yours only emboldens the people fighting to ban guns.

www.nbcnews.com...

33 dead, 130 injured, sure, there were 5 attackers, but people will find a way.

originally posted by: Necrobile

originally posted by: SaturnFX
Do you think you would have the ability to stab to death 17 people as easily as you can shoot 17 people?

Arguments like yours only emboldens the people fighting to ban guns.

www.nbcnews.com...

33 dead, 130 injured, sure, there were 5 attackers, but people will find a way.

You had to look to a 4 year old event in china that was a planned terrorist attack in order to try and equate a single person's nearly monthly news here in the US.

You do realize how weak that is, right?