Questions Emerge Over Florida Shooter's "Full Metal Garb"

a reply to: Boadicea

Not to derail the thread, but I do feel like these two topics are related. In fact, I think that the Florida school shooting is a direct response to the failure of whatever black op was going on in Vegas. It seems like the same agenda was in place for both, and since Vegas did not get the desired results, another school shooting had to take place for the sympathy factor.

My mother got a call from her boyfriend in the middle of the night after Vegas. He had just been on the phone with his friends who called him from the concert. They claimed multiple shooters. He heard the shots on the phone. He is an expert marksman. I have no reason to doubt him. Something larger than what we are being told is going on IMHO.

originally posted by: MisterMcKill
a reply to: Boadicea

Not to derail the thread, but I do feel like these two topics are related. In fact, I think that the Florida school shooting is a direct response to the failure of whatever black op was going on in Vegas. It seems like the same agenda was in place for both, and since Vegas did not get the desired results, another school shooting had to take place for the sympathy factor.

I'm right there with you. I was thinking in terms of escalation... that Vegas was the fulfillment of some kind of threat if someone didn't do something (or stop doing something), and that someone kept doing what they were doing, and this is the escalation. Raising the stakes so-to-speak.

My mother got a call from her boyfriend in the middle of the night after Vegas. He had just been on the phone with his friends who called him from the concert. They claimed multiple shooters. He heard the shots on the phone. He is an expert marksman. I have no reason to doubt him. Something larger than what we are being told is going on IMHO.

I also think this is part of something much greater than we realize. Perhaps even international. I spent some time looking into the Prince Alaweed arrest and the rumors, and I think there may be something there.

What I definitely know is that we are not being told the whole truth. And perhaps being fed outright lies by our government/authorities -- as well as the many private parties twisting and contorting this for their personal agendas.

a reply to: Boadicea

What frightens me are the implications of the larger agenda. This is a micro/macro situation. If we are focused on the individual incidents, but not on the big picture, then we will miss the boat. The puzzle is always larger than the pieces. Gah. It is frustrating to know that something is not right. But such is our lot on ATS lol

originally posted by: MisterMcKill
a reply to: Boadicea

Not to derail the thread, but I do feel like these two topics are related. In fact, I think that the Florida school shooting is a direct response to the failure of whatever black op was going on in Vegas. It seems like the same agenda was in place for both, and since Vegas did not get the desired results, another school shooting had to take place for the sympathy factor.

My mother got a call from her boyfriend in the middle of the night after Vegas. He had just been on the phone with his friends who called him from the concert. They claimed multiple shooters. He heard the shots on the phone. He is an expert marksman. I have no reason to doubt him. Something larger than what we are being told is going on IMHO.

On YouTube, there is an investigator with a channel called Blackstone Intelligence. He has been on the Vegas shoring since day one and he's incredible. I just found him. He has around 90 episodes on the Vegas shooting- he's travelled there several times, and to other places his investigation has taken him.

I 100 percent recommend checking out his Vegas investigation. This guy is phenomenal. On YouTube, his channel is called "Blackstone Intelligence." His name is Jake Morphonios.

originally posted by: MisterMcKill
a reply to: Boadicea

What frightens me are the implications of the larger agenda.

Definitely. But we really already knew things were bad... we're just finding out how bad. And in a way, this is encouraging to me because the "bad guys" are getting reckless because they're getting desperate because this might actually be the first time their power (and freedom) has been so threatened... I fear what the next escalation might be.

This is a micro/macro situation. If we are focused on the individual incidents, but not on the big picture, then we will miss the boat. The puzzle is always larger than the pieces. Gah. It is frustrating to know that something is not right. But such is our lot on ATS lol

We haven't set an easy task for ourselves, that's for sure! But one of the many beauties of ATS is that we have members who are great at focusing on the macro and members who are great at focusing on the micro and members who are great at putting it all together... it's a process, but ultimately a fruitful one. The truth always comes out sooner or later.

a reply to: MisterMcKill

Who the hell wears "full metal garb?"

What on earth could that possibly mean?

a reply to: MisterMcKill

Another thought... and I'm still pondering this... but I do believe that Deputy Peterson is trying to tell us that all is not what it seems, and perhaps even that there were two or more shooters -- not just one. Hence the reference to the body outside, and believing the shooter was outside, and then realizing that there was a shooter inside -- perhaps also, and not instead of? I've been calling for radio audio/transcripts with Peterson, and other pertinent information, and maybe now more folks will demand them. There was no good reason for one deputy to be named and shamed without the facts/evidence to back it up at the same time. And certainly not just one of many.

I am pretty sure that Peterson is legally restricted/limited in what he can say though. I doubt he can speak freely or he would have said more -- and probably said it himself. Deputy Peterson has crossed that thin blue line once. Maybe this attack and betrayal will prompt him to tell his own tales -- about this specific incident, and many others! Doesn't seem he has anything (more) to lose at this point.

originally posted by: JinMI
a reply to: MisterMcKill

Who the hell wears "full metal garb?"

What on earth could that possibly mean?

Aliens! Well, I mean, this ATS, so somebody had to say it...

a reply to: MisterMcKill


Given the woman's age, I was under the assumption that she was making a Metal Gear Solid reference in describing the shooter that she saw. The interesting part to me was where she stated that she couldn't identify the rifle the shooter had.

originally posted by: Guyfriday
a reply to: MisterMcKill
The interesting part to me was where she stated that she couldn't identify the rifle the shooter had.

I wish the interviewer had followed up on that... what she meant by that. Maybe asked her what she knew about firearms, how she knew about firearms, what if any experience she had with firearms, etc.

originally posted by: Boadicea
a reply to: MisterMcKill

Another thought... and I'm still pondering this... but I do believe that Deputy Peterson is trying to tell us that all is not what it seems, and perhaps even that there were two or more shooters -- not just one. Hence the reference to the body outside, and believing the shooter was outside, and then realizing that there was a shooter inside -- perhaps also, and not instead of? I've been calling for radio audio/transcripts with Peterson, and other pertinent information, and maybe now more folks will demand them. There was no good reason for one deputy to be named and shamed without the facts/evidence to back it up at the same time. And certainly not just one of many.

I am pretty sure that Peterson is legally restricted/limited in what he can say though. I doubt he can speak freely or he would have said more -- and probably said it himself. Deputy Peterson has crossed that thin blue line once. Maybe this attack and betrayal will prompt him to tell his own tales -- about this specific incident, and many others! Doesn't seem he has anything (more) to lose at this point.

I get the feeling that we will get nothing. Did you catch the comments by the Sheriff? Scott Israel said somewhere that he may never release the tape... which implies that he has it. Makes me want to pull my hair out lol. Are we not owed transparency? I'm just kidding... I am not that naive.

a reply to: KansasGirl

Thank you kindly for the info, KG. I will check it out.

a reply to: MisterMcKill

This is so much like the James Holmes scenario.

You are right, OP, there is something rotten in Denmark.

Who is this shadow government pulling off these psyop shootings? What do they want...really want? How are they manipulating these teens and young adults?

We should not be afraid to be labeled 'conspiracy nuts' when we bring up these legitimate doubts and questions. We should be in their faces daily till we get some answers.

My thought is that our legitimate government doesn't really know the depth of the who and how!

originally posted by: queenofswords
a reply to: MisterMcKill

This is so much like the James Holmes scenario.

You are right, OP, there is something rotten in Denmark.

Who is this shadow government pulling off these psyop shootings? What do they want...really want? How are they manipulating these teens and young adults?

We should not be afraid to be labeled 'conspiracy nuts' when we bring up these legitimate doubts and questions. We should be in their faces daily till we get some answers.

My thought is that our legitimate government doesn't really know the depth of the who and how!

In a socialist utopia, an armed civilian is a threat to order and structure. So who do you think in behind this?

Which side called for immediate action against the NRA and non-NRA gun owners?

Which side is trying to use this event to push a complete ban of semi-automatic firearms?

It's pretty clear to me wo is behind this, since that once side is getting pinched hard. Just like a tick, it can either pull it's beak out, or lose it's head in the process of being removed. It looks like the Deep State is going for the loss of head on the pinch.

a reply to: MisterMcKill

I get the feeling that we will get nothing.

Don't take this the wrong way, but I really REALLY hope you're wrong about that! I won't hold my breath, but I will hope and pray and keep fingers and toes crossed.

Did you catch the comments by the Sheriff? Scott Israel said somewhere that he may never release the tape... which implies that he has it.

No, I hadn't heard that yet. There is no reason not to release the tape if the kid is pleading guilty. And doesn't Florida have the "Sunshine Law" -- full transparency?

But I think Sheriff Israel is one that has gotten too big for his britches, and thinks he's invincible -- but he's not. No one is and the bigger they are, the harder they fall. All it takes is turning the wrong person against you, and for the sheriff, that may just be Deputy Peterson.

It doesn't hurt that this is the best political climate for whistle blowers in a long time.

Makes me want to pull my hair out lol. Are we not owed transparency? I'm just kidding... I am not that naive.

originally posted by: queenofswords
a reply to: MisterMcKill

This is so much like the James Holmes scenario.

You are right, OP, there is something rotten in Denmark.

Who is this shadow government pulling off these psyop shootings? What do they want...really want? How are they manipulating these teens and young adults?

We should not be afraid to be labeled 'conspiracy nuts' when we bring up these legitimate doubts and questions. We should be in their faces daily till we get some answers.

My thought is that our legitimate government doesn't really know the depth of the who and how!

I certainly respect your opinion and I thank you for your feedback, but I do not think that we have any sort of "legitimate government". I am not sure that we ever had one. I feel like we have all been snowed upon for a very, very, VERY long time, and I doubt that, as long as people desire to be ruled, anything will ever change. But that does not mean that we should stop trying. Our children deserve better.

a reply to: Boadicea

I hope that I am wrong too. But that is a very rare occurrence. Sigh.

a reply to: Guyfriday

I stayed up till 2 AM the other night reading the transcript of the Senate intelligence Committee's hearing of 1977 regarding the MKUltra Project. I went directly to the .gov website. I learned a lot. I had always bought only about 30% of the MKUltra stuff till I read that transcript. Now it is 100%.

Didnt this school have cameras....? I know they were talked about being on some kind of delay but still that could prove to us what the shooter may or may not have been wearing real quick

a reply to: andyr1112

You'd think so. Casinos as well.