It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Woodcarver
She is not a male. She will never be a male. No matter what she puts in her body.
If a male with lower than average testosterone, uses supplements, can he compete against other males?
originally posted by: Woodcarver
originally posted by: kaylaluv
originally posted by: Thirty6BelowZero
a reply to: kaylaluv
You're wrong. There are plenty of testosterone products out there with a warning label that you will fail a sports test if it's in your system. Actually any testosterone product that works as it's intended will fail a sports drug test.
I realize that. I am saying that there should be a medical exemption for trans males who are merely putting enough testosterone in their bodies to satisfy the normal range of testosterone in males — and that those trans males should be able to compete with other males.
You are talking about females on steroids, competing against males. This is not a female becoming a male.
Could you please provide a good reason why this should be acceptable?
Please explain to me what part of my argument is based on ignorance? Does this person have chromosomal Abnormalities?
originally posted by: kaylaluv
originally posted by: Woodcarver
She is not a male. She will never be a male. No matter what she puts in her body.
I’m not interested in your ignorant prejudices.
If a male with lower than average testosterone, uses supplements, can he compete against other males?
I actually think he should be able to, as long as he is not putting his testosterone levels outside the normal range.
Here’s an article advocating for medical exemptions to the zero tolerance to testosterone rule in competition sports:
theconversation.com...
originally posted by: Woodcarver
Please explain to me what part of my argument is based on ignorance?
originally posted by: kaylaluv
originally posted by: Woodcarver
She is not a male. She will never be a male. No matter what she puts in her body.
I’m not interested in your ignorant prejudices.
If a male with lower than average testosterone, uses supplements, can he compete against other males?
I actually think he should be able to, as long as he is not putting his testosterone levels outside the normal range.
Here’s an article advocating for medical exemptions to the zero tolerance to testosterone rule in competition sports:
theconversation.com...
I’m not a transphobe either. I think she should be able to do whatever she wants. She should be allowed to fight anyone who is willing to fight her. Male, female, lions, tigers, i don’t care. But do it outside of regular competition. This type of competition is about pushing human bodies to their natural limits and pitting equal opponents against each other.
originally posted by: kaylaluv
originally posted by: Woodcarver
originally posted by: kaylaluv
originally posted by: Thirty6BelowZero
a reply to: kaylaluv
You're wrong. There are plenty of testosterone products out there with a warning label that you will fail a sports test if it's in your system. Actually any testosterone product that works as it's intended will fail a sports drug test.
I realize that. I am saying that there should be a medical exemption for trans males who are merely putting enough testosterone in their bodies to satisfy the normal range of testosterone in males — and that those trans males should be able to compete with other males.
You are talking about females on steroids, competing against males. This is not a female becoming a male.
Could you please provide a good reason why this should be acceptable?
Because I’m not a transphobe?
You are making assumptions, And you simply can’t explain where my position is wrong.
originally posted by: kaylaluv
originally posted by: Woodcarver
Please explain to me what part of my argument is based on ignorance?
originally posted by: kaylaluv
originally posted by: Woodcarver
She is not a male. She will never be a male. No matter what she puts in her body.
I’m not interested in your ignorant prejudices.
If a male with lower than average testosterone, uses supplements, can he compete against other males?
I actually think he should be able to, as long as he is not putting his testosterone levels outside the normal range.
Here’s an article advocating for medical exemptions to the zero tolerance to testosterone rule in competition sports:
theconversation.com...
Nope. No amount of education I can give you on gender/gender dysphoria/trans sexuality will affect you. You, my friend, are a lost cause.
should Manny Pacquiao be able to use steroids to bulk up until he’s large enough to fight Brock Lesnar?
originally posted by: kaylaluv
originally posted by: Woodcarver
She is not a male. She will never be a male. No matter what she puts in her body.
I’m not interested in your ignorant prejudices.
If a male with lower than average testosterone, uses supplements, can he compete against other males?
I actually think he should be able to, as long as he is not putting his testosterone levels outside the normal range.
Here’s an article advocating for medical exemptions to the zero tolerance to testosterone rule in competition sports:
theconversation.com...
originally posted by: kaylaluv
a reply to: Woodcarver
It doesn’t really matter what the DNA says. There are transgender people who have been taking hormones for so long, that their bodies are so similar to their identified gender - that it would be almost impossible for someone to tell the difference. That is the goal - not to cheat in competition sports, as you seem to imply. The goal is to match the body to what the brain says - and many trans people have become very successful in achieving that goal. Once they have become successful in achieving that goal, why can they not compete in the category of their identified gender?
originally posted by: Abysha
originally posted by: Wardaddy454
originally posted by: Abysha
originally posted by: Wardaddy454
I mean you snowflake over words on a screen by complete strangers. I merely pointed out that calling people bigots isn't going to help people take you seriously.
Hah! All I said when I entered was that it was funny that all of these jerks were trying to misgender a trans person but got it right because they didn't bother to read the article. Like I said, they are tripping over their own bigotry.
Somehow, you all have fooled yourself into believing that calling out jerk behavior is somehow worse than jerk behavior. So yeah... that's the epitome of snowflake.
You didn't say jerks, you said bigots. You were very triggered over a mistake. If you look for bigotry you will always find it.
Sooo you don't care about a fact?
Nope. All you said is that we can't change chromosomes. That's a fact. And nobody cares about chromosomes except for the people who would think it important enough to prop up as a lame argument.
There are eight biological gender markers that determine a person's sex. Chromosomes are among the least because they virtually do nothing once you are an adult. If you were to magically trade your chromosomes with your sister, nothing would change about you. You'd still be a dude.
Considering that both types of gene mapping guide scientists towards the location of a gene on a chromosome, its pretty important. But I'm no biology major.
I acknowledged that fact. I simply said it's a lame argument.
So what do you think would happen if you and your sister switched chromosomes in some twisted experiment? Nothing about your body would change yet people who live by that argument would insist you are now a woman. Does that make sense to you? Again, it's one of several biological gender markers.
And to be honest, there are exceptions and are more common than you think. Unless you took an expensive karyotype test, you can only assume what your chromosomes are. But you know why that test isn't a standard thing your doctor requests? Because it doesn't matter.
originally posted by: SlapMonkey
a reply to: Xtrozero
I'll just be excited when a real girl actually beats him and the crowd erupts in deafening applause.
I think that the state is doing the right thing, here--if we want to be a culture that claims that it's okay for a person to choose which sex they are, then they need to follow it through across the board, even if that means being humiliated because you have to wrestle girls instead of boys.
originally posted by: eNumbra
So he can be born a girl, choose to be a boy, want to wrestle other boys like his choice should allow him, the state can force him to wrestle based on his birth sex(girl)... and the state is doing the right thing?
I think you misunderstood this story prior to posting.
originally posted by: Xtrozero
originally posted by: eNumbra
So he can be born a girl, choose to be a boy, want to wrestle other boys like his choice should allow him, the state can force him to wrestle based on his birth sex(girl)... and the state is doing the right thing?
I think you misunderstood this story prior to posting.
Seems logical and reasonable, well until a person born a boy and wants to be a girl, do we let that person compete with girls now too?