The Times They are A Changing

originally posted by: neo96
a reply to: introvert

WHAT does that say?

No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;

I know what it says, Neo. I also read what you posted.

You just make things up as you go.

originally posted by: Perfectenemy
a reply to: aethertek

How many certified NRA members committed mass school shootings? I'll await your reply with baited breath.

Easy answer: NONE.


They don't shoot people, they only facilitate the shooters ability to get the guns to shoot people.

So, maybe the law should say, you've got to show your NRA membership card, and pay your NRA membership dues, before you're allowed to buy, own, keep and bear arms.



That could solve the problem too.

a reply to: Mandroid7

You support gun owners?

You talk out of both sides of your face.

I support the right to bear arms. The second amendment.

I do not support nutty gun owners that couldn't articulate their right to a child, let alone an intelligent adult.

You don't support gun owners and call them crazy.

Some of them are crazy. Not sure why they had to take a constitutional right and turn it in to a political glamour club of sorts.

There is a major problem with white collar crime and money and wages creating an enviornment that it is too expensive to have a stay-at-home parent teaching kids how to behave. Don't worry, there is a pill for that, eat your corn syrup and shut up cash cows. Behold the consequences of a corporate government. Pure fn insanity and chaos.

Exhibit A...

originally posted by: introvert

originally posted by: neo96
a reply to: introvert

Right!

Anyone that fights to preserve their OWN inalienable right has to be nutz!

The gun culture is nuts and many of them, including yourself, have a very weak grasp on what the right actually entails.

They do not actually fight to preserve their right. They treat the right like it's a social aspect, like drinking beer with your buddies on the weekend.

Lol. There's "gun culture", the folks who like collection or hunting or going to the range.

Then there's the real gun culture which you'll see in every inner city across America, with gangbangers gunning down gangbangers and innocents by the dozens, every single say, with illegal guns.

a reply to: introvert

Nope.

A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms,shall not be infringed.

www.law.cornell.edu...

The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.

www.law.cornell.edu...

All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the state wherein they reside.

No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;

nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.

www.law.cornell.edu...

I really wish the person in the thread trying to legalize institutionalized discrimination would GET THAT.

a reply to: MysticPearl

Lol. There's "gun culture", the folks who like collection or hunting or going to the range.

Then there's the real gun culture which you'll see in every inner city across America, with gangbangers gunning down gangbangers and innocents by the dozens, every single say, with illegal guns.

No. There is more to it than just that. But I guess if your goal was to deflect, you achieved that goal.

a reply to: introvert

what are you 5? I havent heard so much name calling since my 7 year old had a sleep over.

What I was referring to, was your statement regarding this supposed gun culture...but I see a lack of reading comprehension on your part has caused you to call me names.

Always a good way to sway opinions, or do you just like to argue?

a reply to: neo96

I really wish the person in the thread trying to legalize institutionalized discrimination would GET THAT.

I wish you had the balls to say what you meant directly. I'm not sure who you are referring to.

a reply to: BlueJacket

what are you 5? I havent heard so much name calling since my 7 year old had a sleep over.

I did not call anyone any name in that post.

What I was referring to, was your statement regarding this supposed gun culture...but I see a lack of reading comprehension on your part has caused you to call me names.

No. You were referring to a comparison that was not applicable and did not apply to anything I had said.

And I did not call you a name. Go back and read the post.

originally posted by: neo96

I really wish the person in the thread trying to legalize institutionalized discrimination would GET THAT.

Slaves were people, at the time, back then, before emancipation, they couldn't own guns.

Yet the same constitution, refers to people, how could it exclude the slaves?

Who legalized that institutionalized discrimination against the "people" of African descent?

The constitution has never meant "all the people", even when it uses the word "people".

When will all the protesters march into gang banger territories and demand there guns? Hypocrites.

originally posted by: introvert
a reply to: neo96

I really wish the person in the thread trying to legalize institutionalized discrimination would GET THAT.

I wish you had the balls to say what you meant directly. I'm not sure who you are referring to.

Anti gun BIGOTS.

Happy?

a reply to: AMPTAH

Who legalized that institutionalized discrimination against the "people" of African descent?

The same people that have denied them the right to protect themselves in places like Chicago.

Gun Control was born out of racism.

The 'South' is still at it.

originally posted by: neo96

originally posted by: introvert
a reply to: neo96

I really wish the person in the thread trying to legalize institutionalized discrimination would GET THAT.

I wish you had the balls to say what you meant directly. I'm not sure who you are referring to.

Anti gun BIGOTS.

Happy?

No. You said "the person". Which means you were referring to one particular person.

No matter. It's not relevant. You're just ranting anyway.

Anyone thinking more limits on guns will not happen is living in fantasy land. The younger folk are all for it and in a few years they will be running it all.
Not saying it is right or wrong but those are the facts.

originally posted by: introvert
a reply to: aethertek

I don't think this will mean much in the end. We have a 2nd amendment right and no matter of protesting or boycott will change that.

What we do need to change is the gun culture in this country.

They've gone a bit nuts.

I don't know, I sense momentum, the look in those kids eyes were anger not fear.
& these are the generation that grew up with these massacres, they have the purpose of people who wont take it anymore.

K~

a reply to: introvert

Guilty conscience?

Your not trying to institute legalized discrimination?

Only one group has a better claim as oppose to another group less favored?

Tell me more how all persons in this country don't deserve the same rights.

originally posted by: aethertek

originally posted by: introvert
a reply to: aethertek

I don't think this will mean much in the end. We have a 2nd amendment right and no matter of protesting or boycott will change that.

What we do need to change is the gun culture in this country.

They've gone a bit nuts.

I don't know, I sense momentum, the look in those kids eyes were anger not fear.
& these are the generation that grew up with these massacres, they have the purpose of people who wont take it anymore.

K~

We can ban firearms and every attachment known to man and it will not stop tragedy from occurring.

I understand how these kids may be feeling, but I think their energy is misplaced.

a reply to: neo96

Guilty conscience?

No.

Your not trying to institute legalized discrimination?

No.

Only one group has a better claim as oppose to another group less favored?

I never said anything of the sort.

Tell me more how all persons in this country don't deserve the same rights.

I never said that either. So I cannot tell you more.

Do you just keep making things up as you go?

This is why I said we don't need people such as yourself trying to articulate and defend the 2nd amendment right.

You make us all look nuts.

No thank you.

originally posted by: aethertek

originally posted by: introvert
a reply to: aethertek

I don't think this will mean much in the end. We have a 2nd amendment right and no matter of protesting or boycott will change that.

What we do need to change is the gun culture in this country.

They've gone a bit nuts.

I don't know, I sense momentum, the look in those kids eyes were anger not fear.
& these are the generation that grew up with these massacres, they have the purpose of people who wont take it anymore.

K~

Where is the anger for gangs who kill children too? You're just pretending to care about the children. In fact your posts and thread sound like you'e glad that this happenend. You're a disgusting human being. Scratch that you're not human at all.