It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: AndyFromMichigan
The only way these guys are going to stop lying and trampling on our rights are if they know it'll come back to bite them on the ass, hard.
originally posted by: Butterfinger
originally posted by: sligtlyskeptical
All I care about is if the info in the dossier is true or false. If it was false there is a problem. if it is true then the problem is Trumps and all these allegations of an improper FISA process are worthless. Give the actions of the right here it would sure appear that the dossier has some serious nuggets of truth.
Youre guessing at actions and press releases, or lack thereof.
Facts are in. HRC, DNC, FBI, CIA, DOJ... all are involved with creating, pushing it, or trying to clear a path for this Collusiuon narrative via the dossier.
originally posted by: Hewhowaits
It would be truly entertaining to hear what really occurs at these fine institutions. ..
Exclusive: CIA Ex-Director Brennan's Perjury Peril
By Paul Sperry, RealClearInvestigations
House Intelligence Committee Chairman Devin Nunes next plans to investigate the role former CIA Director John Brennan and other Obama intelligence officials played in promoting the salacious and unverified Steele dossier on Donald Trump -- including whether Brennan perjured himself in public testimony about it.
In his May 2017 testimony before the intelligence panel, Brennan emphatically denied the dossier factored into the intelligence community’s publicly released conclusion last year that Russia meddled in the 2016 election "to help Trump’s chances of victory.”
Brennan also swore that he did not know who commissioned the anti-Trump research document (excerpt here), even though senior national security and counterintelligence officials at the Justice Department and FBI knew the previous year that the dossier was funded by the Hillary Clinton campaign.
originally posted by: pavil
a reply to: soberbacchus
Link to article
Exclusive: CIA Ex-Director Brennan's Perjury Peril
By Paul Sperry, RealClearInvestigations
House Intelligence Committee Chairman Devin Nunes next plans to investigate the role former CIA Director John Brennan and other Obama intelligence officials played in promoting the salacious and unverified Steele dossier on Donald Trump -- including whether Brennan perjured himself in public testimony about it.
In his May 2017 testimony before the intelligence panel, Brennan emphatically denied the dossier factored into the intelligence community’s publicly released conclusion last year that Russia meddled in the 2016 election "to help Trump’s chances of victory.”
Brennan also swore that he did not know who commissioned the anti-Trump research document (excerpt here), even though senior national security and counterintelligence officials at the Justice Department and FBI knew the previous year that the dossier was funded by the Hillary Clinton campaign.
Some intelligence head......doesn't even know what the DOJ knew for a year.
He's got some splaining to do.
originally posted by: soberbacchus
Where is the transcript of Brennan's testimony?
originally posted by: soberbacchus
originally posted by: pavil
a reply to: soberbacchus
Link to article
Exclusive: CIA Ex-Director Brennan's Perjury Peril
By Paul Sperry, RealClearInvestigations
House Intelligence Committee Chairman Devin Nunes next plans to investigate the role former CIA Director John Brennan and other Obama intelligence officials played in promoting the salacious and unverified Steele dossier on Donald Trump -- including whether Brennan perjured himself in public testimony about it.
In his May 2017 testimony before the intelligence panel, Brennan emphatically denied the dossier factored into the intelligence community’s publicly released conclusion last year that Russia meddled in the 2016 election "to help Trump’s chances of victory.”
Brennan also swore that he did not know who commissioned the anti-Trump research document (excerpt here), even though senior national security and counterintelligence officials at the Justice Department and FBI knew the previous year that the dossier was funded by the Hillary Clinton campaign.
Some intelligence head......doesn't even know what the DOJ knew for a year.
He's got some splaining to do.
That's repeating the talking head.
Where is the transcript of Brennan's testimony?
BRENNAN: Yes, it is because it's not CIA's job to make a determination about whether a U.S. person is cooperating, colluding, or whatever in some type of criminal or legal matter.
[10:45:10] It is our responsibility to give the Bureau everything that they need in order to follow that path and make such a determination and recommendation if they want to press charges.
originally posted by: pavil
originally posted by: soberbacchus
originally posted by: pavil
a reply to: soberbacchus
Link to article
Exclusive: CIA Ex-Director Brennan's Perjury Peril
By Paul Sperry, RealClearInvestigations
House Intelligence Committee Chairman Devin Nunes next plans to investigate the role former CIA Director John Brennan and other Obama intelligence officials played in promoting the salacious and unverified Steele dossier on Donald Trump -- including whether Brennan perjured himself in public testimony about it.
In his May 2017 testimony before the intelligence panel, Brennan emphatically denied the dossier factored into the intelligence community’s publicly released conclusion last year that Russia meddled in the 2016 election "to help Trump’s chances of victory.”
Brennan also swore that he did not know who commissioned the anti-Trump research document (excerpt here), even though senior national security and counterintelligence officials at the Justice Department and FBI knew the previous year that the dossier was funded by the Hillary Clinton campaign.
Some intelligence head......doesn't even know what the DOJ knew for a year.
He's got some splaining to do.
That's repeating the talking head.
Where is the transcript of Brennan's testimony?
Coming from someone who thinks the Steele Dossier is true.
Realclearpolitics is a legit site. I'll let this play out and then you can apologize.
originally posted by: soberbacchus
originally posted by: pavil
originally posted by: soberbacchus
originally posted by: pavil
a reply to: soberbacchus
Link to article
Exclusive: CIA Ex-Director Brennan's Perjury Peril
By Paul Sperry, RealClearInvestigations
House Intelligence Committee Chairman Devin Nunes next plans to investigate the role former CIA Director John Brennan and other Obama intelligence officials played in promoting the salacious and unverified Steele dossier on Donald Trump -- including whether Brennan perjured himself in public testimony about it.
In his May 2017 testimony before the intelligence panel, Brennan emphatically denied the dossier factored into the intelligence community’s publicly released conclusion last year that Russia meddled in the 2016 election "to help Trump’s chances of victory.”
Brennan also swore that he did not know who commissioned the anti-Trump research document (excerpt here), even though senior national security and counterintelligence officials at the Justice Department and FBI knew the previous year that the dossier was funded by the Hillary Clinton campaign.
Some intelligence head......doesn't even know what the DOJ knew for a year.
He's got some splaining to do.
That's repeating the talking head.
Where is the transcript of Brennan's testimony?
Coming from someone who thinks the Steele Dossier is true.
Absolutely. I go with Christopher Steele's own estimate of 70%-80% of the intel he was given being accurate.
Realclearpolitics is a legit site. I'll let this play out and then you can apologize.
RCP is an aggregate site that simply posts other people's articles.
The CIA's conclusion on Russian Interference was not based on the Dossier.
The FBI is not the CIA. You have to be a Trump supporter to confuse the two.