-@TH3WH17ERABB17-Q- Questions. White House Insider's postings- PART 3

originally posted by: IAMTAT
a reply to: crankyoldman

AGAIN...from "30,000 ft."...
The MIRROR is the KEYSTONE...It links and suspends BOTH sides from the center.

Q142-149

Looking ahead by looking behind We see tomorrow suggesting an attack event of some sort?

Fed is heavily mentioned so we can assume tomorrow the Fed takes a huge hit. Of course it is a branch of the IMF Roth's back and not an entity on its own, so we can then extrapolate out to banking families LDR's vampire nest will be taking a hit. 80 percent covert...

Q145 AND 146

::::WARNING::::
This is not a game!
DIRECT ATTACK TODAY BY NYT/CLOWNS IN AMERICA:
www.nytimes.com...
Do you believe in coincidences?
How many coincidences do you need before you believe?
This is the biggest insider drop in the history of the world.
Pray.

Now what is rather mind blowing is Trumps recent decisions vis a vie trade, taxes etc. Could these decisions be solely based on now predicted Mirror Outcomes?

originally posted by: AnkhMorpork
I have an idea for Twitter - need to somehow convert it into an effective meme (help?)

Here it is in a nutshell.

The right should follow and befriend the left.


You heard that right. On Twitter, I've noticed that people only follow and are followed by people of like-mind where it started with a leftist dominance, but is now being "infiltrated" by the right and poor Jack doesn't know what to do about it while claiming to be in pursuit of a healthier and more Civilized conversation with more balance. Secretly he hates and loathes the right as well and is thinking of ways to remove them from the conversation under this guise and pretext..

Therefore, if the right chose, instead of creating an ever-growing echo-chamber preaching to the choir, to cross the field so to speak with an outstretched and reasonable, sturdy right hand of friendship and actively court the rest of the twitterverse ie: the middle and middle left (far left are the fringe ie: the heavily tatood pussy hatted lesbians (don't mean to lump all the women's marchers in with that), beta male soy bois and pot-smoking (not that there's anything necessarily wrong with that) antifa hoodlums looking for a fun riot and mayhem - they don't matter or count) - it would work, and it would happen in the twinkling of an eye, beyond which no FF and no amount of propaganda will be able to stop it, the new and infinitely more authentic narrative.

I would like to watch Jack's face as the new analytics begin to come in, showing a move of great Civility and courage and utter reasonablness, on the part of the right to "heal" the overall conversation, while running away with the narrative and the essential IDEA of Liberty, Truth and Justice for all including free market self determination and the framework of the Constitution and Bill of Rights and Freedoms (including 2A).

In other words, while trending the next coupel of Hashtags in succession and momentarily driving the conversation, to make this extra move in crossing the field and infiltrating with reason, logic and the utmost heart and Civility the rest of the twitterverse while giving the conversation the "health" (which Jack claims to be now looking for) as a Civil Discourse and Conversation, about the meaning of life and everything as a principal-centered pursuit for the sake of health and well being of every person and the basis for a sane society (a rare novelty).

This is the Great Awakening, when backed by real news.

Then after Twitter, Facebook, like a one two punch, while boycotting Google and finally, migrating from Twitter to Gab and from Facebook to something infinitely better looking and more navigable.

Trump could run in 2020 in part on the idea of an Internet Bill of Rights and Freedom's amid the repeal of Net Neutrality which was a set up for Government censorship.

It's not a matter of harnessing the Internet to run a campaign. We are the Internet and we rule! We create the narrative now, that's starting to happen ever moreso I can see it and feel it.

So if we're on the cusp - why not cross the Rubicon or the Deleware? (and was there not a hoodwink in that move by Washington? i need to study up on that history).

The humor mirth and sense of irony and play of doing such a thing is just irresistable, and inevitable.

What is the "voice" of Liberty? It's certainly not censorship!

Best wishes,

Ankh

I think this is so important. Two sides coming together over these subjects. Currently there is the news cycle of the NRA boycott which was planned. A focus on something that unfortunately is not going to help anything.

I think it is almost impossible to bring the two sides together, right now at least. I think something that might work is a neutral stance, like finding certain issues everyone can focus on without having to get their backs up over partisan issues. That's really hard to do coming from any person with a deep history of supporting either side.

This is what they want stupid infighting from both sides keeping our eyes of the real ball. Subjects that might work are the deep state and unlawful abuse from both parties. Privacy, government spying, always my pet peeve, but people seem to not care that much...obviously human trafficking etc. The problem is...somehow... These issues have been made partisan. How crazy is it that anyone mentioning people with power abusing children is PG therefore fake!??Anyone got any other subject ideas?

I fear that things are so divided right now even if say, Podesta , was charged the left would call it a smear campaign at this point because it's been set up to LOOK that way. Once certain things are in the whole public focus it won't be so difficult for people to see the forest through the trees.

Q and any movement shouldn't focus on being partisan. I would BET there are hundreds of thousands of left supporters who are interested but keeping quiet because they feel it's a right wing Trump supporting thing. Those people are just waiting to have something draw them into the conversation. Maybe that's not Q specifically but instead one or more big issues he has lead us to.

If truths come out about base issues affecting everyone and people can say to themselves, and others, "I dont have to support Trump to support truth from government." Things will come together and that is, I think, what needs to happen. Both sides need to unite over...something. What is that something?

a reply to: queenofswords

To link to Q/Anon posts - A post containing "shot across the bow" was made on 1/21/18:

Jan 21 2018 22:20:15Anonymousc4d817120926

GUYS- email was sent out by NSA before election with some plausible deniability attached to it so people could say "FAKE"! HOWEVER, the main audience wasn't normies, it was the black hats, a shot across the bow to say "WE HAVE IT ALL, YOUR'E RIGGING WON'T WORK". Q just brought it back up to speak directly to "THEM" again to show they are going to dump it all.

a reply to: texasgirl

If you string together the shooting and the train derailment, that makes two attempted mass casualty attacks on Republican lawmakers since Trump's election.

Are they going to go for a third and hope it's the proverbial charm?

a reply to: IAMTAT

Should I add a "MIRROR DATE" column to the UNANSWERED Q spreadsheet?

If so, am I right in interpreting the mirror date is 111 days after the Q post date?

11/12/17 = 3/3/18
11/13/17 = 3/4/18 etc. ?

a reply to: RelSciHistItSufi

Honestly, I don't know.
It is still only a theory...but it seems it's one which is becoming more and more accepted.

There was a Prop 187 in Cali?

Whose bright idea was that?

"Conventional wisdom" is that it signaled the "death" of the Republican party in California because it sought to bar illegal immigrant from public social services.

Ron Johnson releases a letter ...

In it, he constructs a strange timeline that exposes some questions about how things were handled with the Weiner laptop. All of the important names are there, including Rybicki, and the Strzok/Page texts provide the backbone.

All full text of the letter is provided, along with dates, and names where not redacted.

New lawsuit against Alphabet.

This time YouTube is in trouble. This one is charging that they would openly discriminate in their hiring practices to fill internally set diversity quotas meaning they would simply jettison white and Asian male resumes. Further, they were instructed to purge electronic evidence of their practices to cleanup their hiring records.

So, illegal discrimination and lying about the same. Both illegal.

How does it look for the same company policing others for racism to be engaging in the same?

originally posted by: crankyoldman

originally posted by: IAMTAT
a reply to: crankyoldman

AGAIN...from "30,000 ft."...
The MIRROR is the KEYSTONE...It links and suspends BOTH sides from the center.

Q142-149

Looking ahead by looking behind

We see tomorrow suggesting an attack event of some sort?

Fed is heavily mentioned so we can assume tomorrow the Fed takes a huge hit. Of course it is a branch of the IMF Roth's back and not an entity on its own, so we can then extrapolate out to banking families LDR's vampire nest will be taking a hit. 80 percent covert...

Q145 AND 146

::::WARNING::::
This is not a game!
DIRECT ATTACK TODAY BY NYT/CLOWNS IN AMERICA:
www.nytimes.com...
Do you believe in coincidences?
How many coincidences do you need before you believe?
This is the biggest insider drop in the history of the world.
Pray.

Now what is rather mind blowing is Trumps recent decisions vis a vie trade, taxes etc. Could these decisions be solely based on now predicted Mirror Outcomes?

Wow, somehow I missed reading this article the 1st time around, the implications are pretty heavy. The author is certainly trying to dox Q and portray the motives of the Q movement as basically an attack on the N.S.A and various business interests. So, while we agreed to not try and dox Q here, it brings to mind a few questions worth consideration.

1. Why would the N.S.A. object to outing trader's,criminals and pedo's ? Isn't that their job ? as far as cyber attacks on business's, I don't know enough to comment or even speculate on whether Q had anything to do with that or not.

2. Does or should it matter if Q is aligned with some sort of foreign intelligence ? Wouldn't that almost be necessary for the White Hats around the World to come together to defeat these criminal globalists that see all our countries like a Monopoly board being played for their amusement. Just look at this thread and all the people here from different countries working together.

3. Then comes the million dollar question, what kind of attack should we brace ourselves for ? Does or will a mass awakening be able to prevent something catastrophic from happening or will that somehow force the cabal's hand and they unleash horror beyond our worst nightmares? If the latter is their end game do we really have any other choice but to keep fighting and at least save our souls ?

Anyways....the poor babies at the N.S.A. feel taunted !

Compounding the pain for the N.S.A. is the attackers’ regular online public taunts, written in ersatz broken English. Their posts are a peculiar mash-up of immaturity and sophistication, laced with profane jokes but also savvy cultural and political references. They suggest that their author — if not an American — knows the United States well.

www.nytimes.com...

a reply to: ketsuko

YouTube has been in trouble for a while. Censorship issues and the “finger family algorithm” being just two recent examples.

originally posted by: Greenanon
a reply to: ketsuko

YouTube has been in trouble for a while. Censorship issues and the “finger family algorithm” being just two recent examples.

Yes, in those senses. I was thinking about the Damore lawsuit against Google when I wrote that.

originally posted by: IAMTAT
a reply to: RelSciHistItSufi

Honestly, I don't know.
It is still only a theory...but it seems it's one which is becoming more and more accepted.

Nov. 20th we have Q#162 "QMAP 1/2 confirmed. This is the key."

- it's a halfway point established. 28 days in? "...the key?"

So 28 days later we have dec 18. Q#370 ">>121553 Clock started - 10 days."

- first reference to clock being started, as in Mirrored effect is confirmed?

Q is dark dec 25th until jan 3.

clock again Jan 6 Q#477 : "Think clock. Wind the clock w/ all markers."
& Jan 7 Q#506 "Think clock. Wind the clock w/ all markers."

- 2x clock - 2 possibilities? Mirror effect in place now with confirmed future markers having been seen?

Jan 19th. Q#564 Counter-narrative went out @ 4am to MSM contractors [like clockwork].

- MSM, which is used to move consciousness in the controller's direction has put out the counter Mirror energy steering narrative? "like clockwork" as in predicted? "counter narrative" after SOTU too. Could "so stupid" reference not knowing future therefor thinking they are in charge?

Jan 27 2018 Q#628 @Snowden.The clock is ticking. How's Russia? [Mr. Contractor]

- CIA version of Mirror compromised - bad data, not functioning?

Q#793 Feb 18 2018 107 "GO WITH GOD.THE CLOCK IS ACTIVATED."

- Caps for "The Clock Is Activated." Time to look back and see what's in the future?

- Q has been dark from feb 23rd? 9 days last time in dec/jan. Sunday Q commun?

"No Coincidences Expand You Thinking" sweeping aside the new agey "everything happens for a reason..." and "you can connect anything to make a coincidence seem plausible or not..." we could say the "Expand Your Thinking" admonition around coincidence might mean, planned front to back and back to front?

Time itself is not linear, that is a function of the slow vibrational rate of 3d, or what remains of it. This entire thing has clearly not been linear, could this be the umbrella process under which the rest fits?

Just spitballing on the ideas of future proves past....

originally posted by: MountainLaurel

originally posted by: crankyoldman

originally posted by: IAMTAT
a reply to: crankyoldman

AGAIN...from "30,000 ft."...
The MIRROR is the KEYSTONE...It links and suspends BOTH sides from the center.

Q142-149

Looking ahead by looking behind

We see tomorrow suggesting an attack event of some sort?

Fed is heavily mentioned so we can assume tomorrow the Fed takes a huge hit. Of course it is a branch of the IMF Roth's back and not an entity on its own, so we can then extrapolate out to banking families LDR's vampire nest will be taking a hit. 80 percent covert...

Q145 AND 146

::::WARNING::::
This is not a game!
DIRECT ATTACK TODAY BY NYT/CLOWNS IN AMERICA:
www.nytimes.com...
Do you believe in coincidences?
How many coincidences do you need before you believe?
This is the biggest insider drop in the history of the world.
Pray.

Now what is rather mind blowing is Trumps recent decisions vis a vie trade, taxes etc. Could these decisions be solely based on now predicted Mirror Outcomes?

Wow, somehow I missed reading this article the 1st time around, the implications are pretty heavy. The author is certainly trying to dox Q and portray the motives of the Q movement as basically an attack on the N.S.A and various business interests. So, while we agreed to not try and dox Q here, it brings to mind a few questions worth consideration.

1. Why would the N.S.A. object to outing trader's,criminals and pedo's ? Isn't that their job ? as far as cyber attacks on business's, I don't know enough to comment or even speculate on whether Q had anything to do with that or not.

2. Does or should it matter if Q is aligned with some sort of foreign intelligence ? Wouldn't that almost be necessary for the White Hats around the World to come together to defeat these criminal globalists that see all our countries like a Monopoly board being played for their amusement. Just look at this thread and all the people here from different countries working together.

3. Then comes the million dollar question, what kind of attack should we brace ourselves for ? Does or will a mass awakening be able to prevent something catastrophic from happening or will that somehow force the cabal's hand and they unleash horror beyond our worst nightmares? If the latter is their end game do we really have any other choice but to keep fighting and at least save our souls ?

Anyways....the poor babies at the N.S.A. feel taunted !

Compounding the pain for the N.S.A. is the attackers’ regular online public taunts, written in ersatz broken English. Their posts are a peculiar mash-up of immaturity and sophistication, laced with profane jokes but also savvy cultural and political references. They suggest that their author — if not an American — knows the United States well.

www.nytimes.com...

Indeed. To me going back now and seeing the present spelled out in the past makes new eyes on it all. That article says something very different in light of what we now see for sure.

As for the attack, certainly interesting as our foreknowledge, which is past knowledge, as seen through the present, but spelled out in the past.... may alter the event(s) entirely.

a reply to: ketsuko

Alphabet can only keep their name out of the news for so long.

Google/YouTube lawsuits.

The new Bro culture harassment suits.

Eric Schmidt has way too much influence.

WTF! I knew this russian hacking Mueller BS was another distraction from something important. 2018 Amendments to the Manual for Courts-Martial, United States I'm not fluent in legalese but this EO sounds like something yuge is on the horizon.

By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, including chapter 47 of title 10, United States Code (Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), 10 U.S.C. 801-946), and in order to prescribe amendments to the Manual for Courts-Martial, United States, prescribed by Executive Order 12473 of April 13, 1984, as amended, it is hereby ordered as follows:

Section 1. Part II, Part III, and Part IV of the Manual for Courts-Martial, United States, are amended as described in Annex 1, which is attached to and made a part of this order.

Sec. 2. The amendments in Annex 1 shall take effect on the date of this order, subject to the following:

(a) Nothing in Annex 1 shall be construed to make punishable any act done or omitted prior to the date of this order that was not punishable when done or omitted.

(b) Nothing in Annex 1 shall be construed to invalidate the prosecution of any offense committed before the date of this order. The maximum punishment for an offense committed before the date of this order shall not exceed the maximum punishment in effect at the time of the commission of such offense.

(c) Nothing in Annex 1 shall be construed to invalidate any nonjudicial punishment proceeding, restraint, investigation, referral of charges, trial in which arraignment occurred, or other action begun prior to the date of this order, and any such nonjudicial punishment proceeding, restraint, investigation, referral of charges, trial in which arraignment occurred, or other action shall proceed in the same manner and with the same effect as if the amendments in Annex 1 had not been prescribed.

Andrew Breitbart died 6 years ago yesterday.

We should recall that politics is downstream of culture (A. Breitbart).

I think Breitbart’s point was not about “culture wars.” It wasn’t about gay marriage or any of the other hot social issues. It was about a systematic tearing down of “that which is good about America” that started on the campuses and has migrated into the entertainment and media cultures while Breitbart was still alive.

Now it’s migrated again into the corporate, and particularly high tech, culture. Corporate capitulation to left-wing social media campaigns reflects that fear of negative publicity from the left is more important than the rights of those on the right.

I’ve heard the characterization, not sure who gets credit for it, that the culture war has been lost, and what’s happening now is that the winners are searching the countryside to finish off the survivors.

Now reflect on social media and who controls those platforms and understand the magnitude the battle we face.

originally posted by: Perfectenemy
WTF! I knew this russian hacking Mueller BS was another distraction from something important. 2018 Amendments to the Manual for Courts-Martial, United States I'm not fluent in legalese but this EO sounds like something yuge is on the horizon.

By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, including chapter 47 of title 10, United States Code (Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), 10 U.S.C. 801-946), and in order to prescribe amendments to the Manual for Courts-Martial, United States, prescribed by Executive Order 12473 of April 13, 1984, as amended, it is hereby ordered as follows:

Section 1. Part II, Part III, and Part IV of the Manual for Courts-Martial, United States, are amended as described in Annex 1, which is attached to and made a part of this order.

Sec. 2. The amendments in Annex 1 shall take effect on the date of this order, subject to the following:

(a) Nothing in Annex 1 shall be construed to make punishable any act done or omitted prior to the date of this order that was not punishable when done or omitted.

(b) Nothing in Annex 1 shall be construed to invalidate the prosecution of any offense committed before the date of this order. The maximum punishment for an offense committed before the date of this order shall not exceed the maximum punishment in effect at the time of the commission of such offense.

(c) Nothing in Annex 1 shall be construed to invalidate any nonjudicial punishment proceeding, restraint, investigation, referral of charges, trial in which arraignment occurred, or other action begun prior to the date of this order, and any such nonjudicial punishment proceeding, restraint, investigation, referral of charges, trial in which arraignment occurred, or other action shall proceed in the same manner and with the same effect as if the amendments in Annex 1 had not been prescribed.

From what I understand, these amendments don't start until 2019 and more importantly it does NOT include crimes before 2019. So basically a nothing burger.

That's my take but then again, it's hard to understand as I don't speak legal jargon.

a reply to: Perfectenemy

Comments:
1) Changes seem to apply on January 1st 2019?
2) The appendices do not seem available at the link so difficult to say whether the EO is increasing or decreasing Military Court powers?

originally posted by: RelSciHistItSufi
a reply to: Perfectenemy

Comments:
1) Changes seem to apply on January 1st 2019?
2) The appendices do not seem available at the link so difficult to say whether the EO is increasing or decreasing Military Court powers?

Here is a list of the ANNEXES. Infinity is pretty pleased with the EO.