-@TH3WH17ERABB17-Q- Questions. White House Insider's postings- PART 3

a reply to: Skyfloating

I dont think Israel is evil. I think there is strong relationship between the deep state and the Zionist regime. Plenty of evidence to prove this to be the case. So if its established as a a fact you really should be asking the question why is there no talk from Q on this special relationship in which the US blindly poors huge amounts of money, military support and political support.

Q said thre will be 911 justice. We all know the Zionists had a role to play. Q takes on entire political system, countries, intelligent agenices, the deep state but not a word on the Zionist regime..

Wikieaks was censored, Pizzagate was ceonsored but QAnon is allowed.. Whats going on here. ?

I like the Q posts i find them very interesting. But this does not make sense.

a reply to: fluff007

Netanyahu's Likud party had to switch alliances in the Knesset might be one explanation.

Earlier, they were aligned with another party. Now, they are aligned with a different party to form their coalition government.

I don't know for sure how that swings political positions, but it certainly does since one of those parties was more liberal/Zionist and the other party is more conservative/Orthodox.

Obama also tried like crazy to unseat Bibi during the last election too. Our press screams about Russian meddling, but Obama legitimately did engage in election meddling over there and it was openly reported in our press here.

Now tell them I design satellites for NASA.

That’s my favorite part.

a reply to: MostlyReading

Fluff is a supporter or WL and has been for a long time. I am not sure who is control of WL twitter account i find it all very confusing. Its been made to be that way.

In my opinion JA is no longer in the embassy and it possibly in Hawai. I posted a thread on RATS on it.

Happy days

originally posted by: Greenanon
Now tell them I design satellites for NASA.

That’s my favorite part.

What you on about

originally posted by: purplemer


Wikieaks was censored, Pizzagate was ceonsored but QAnon is allowed.. Whats going on here. ?

I like the Q posts i find them very interesting. But this does not make sense.

Q is part of the same current that brought us wikileaks and pizzagate. Those were fiercely shut down. They weren't enough. So then came Q. And Q is not the last. More to come.

There are a LOT of things not mentioned by Q. Qs main focus is Deep State U.S.A. and the Triangle (Saud, Rothschild, Soros). There are a lot of other players, but those are the three he is focusing on. The "zionists" you refer to, are an extension of the Rothschilds.

a reply to: ketsuko

There are Jews and there are Jews.

There are Jews and there are Zionists.

a reply to: MostlyReading

Wow you're a piece of work. Hit a nerve have I..?

In no way have I ever smeared JA or WL. Go look through all my posts on ATS on WL and JA. Go see. I didn't even smear him in my post. I saw his tweet and to my tired eyes that is how it read to me. It worried me, hence I posted it here. I can see that it isn't how it is. But wow if this is the reaction I get for suggesting something other than the status quo on an individual - you're no better than the liberal lefties and their cognitive dissonance.

This is the FIRST time ever I have online suggested that he might've been saying something different than what he usually says.

Don't worry I'm watched enough as it is... It bothers me not. Watch away I'm not that exciting...

a reply to: purplemer


Nobody who tells the lie that Julian Assange now supports censorship is a "friend" of Wikileaks. Especially when that person is unable to offer the slightest piece of information that backs up such a ludicrous claim, despite being asked for it repeatedly. Then that person is simply posting a baseless smear. Why would a "friend" of Wikileaks do that? Does that make any kind of sense to you? It sure as hell makes no sense to me.

And there is no proof that Assange is in Hawaii either. You may believe it, doesn't make it a fact.

www.youtube.com...

There really are no coincidences...

Speaking of JA this literally just popped up in my Twitter feed...

You can now watch Julian Assange live for one hour 16:00 GMT 15th March The Future Of Cyber Security Conference



Its been ages since I've seen him on a live stream with him sat on a chair with the Embassy in the background. Which always made me wonder why he stopped doing that. Adds to the validity that he isn't where most think he is. Wonder if he'll be in front of a green screen again....

a reply to: Skyfloating

Q is part of the same current that brought us wikileaks and pizzagate. Those were fiercely shut down. They weren't enough. So then came Q. And Q is not the last. More to come.

There are a LOT of things not mentioned by Q. Qs main focus is Deep State U.S.A. and the Triangle (Saud, Rothschild, Soros). There are a lot of other players, but those are the three he is focusing on. The "zionists" you refer to, are an extension of the Rothschilds.

Thank you for your reply.

I will tone it down after this not trying to mess up the thread. I appreciate the work that peeps are doing. If Qs main focus is the deep state then his eyes should be firmly on the Zionist regime. Q is happy to mention ISIS. How can you talk about ISIS unless you talk about the CIA and the Zionists they are very linked.

How can Q talk about 911 justice and forget to mention Mossad. These are big things to miss out on. The CIA and Mossad are in bed together. You cannot out one without the other.

Why do you think from US administration to US administration Israel continues to get funded. It falls out of the normal democratic process. This is a deep state strategy.

If Q ignores this then there is something very wrong here.

a reply to: fluff007


Another lengthy fluff post, still with NO proof whatsoever to back up your assinine Assange smear, I see.

originally posted by: MostlyReading
a reply to: purplemer


Nobody who tells the lie that Julian Assange now supports censorship is a "friend" of Wikileaks. Especially when that person is unable to offer the slightest piece of information that backs up such a ludicrous claim, despite being asked for it repeatedly. Then that person is simply posting a baseless smear. Why would a "friend" of Wikileaks do that? Does that make any kind of sense to you? It sure as hell makes no sense to me.

And there is no proof that Assange is in Hawaii either. You may believe it, doesn't make it a fact.

There is nothing wrong with questioning wether JA is in control of his twitter account. The actions over the tweet where strange in my opinion.


Yes i think he is in protective custody. I follow WL very closely and there where some strange happening over the christmas period. (Between WL, AnonSCan and the US Navy) The thread is intresting. I am not sure if you can read it as its in RATS) I will post the OP here if you want a peruse.

If you want to talk about Israel you have to talk about Pakistan.

Fairs fair.

a reply to: purplemer

So why mention Israel when the Zionist represent the threat?

a reply to: ketsuko

The Democrats Memo has been released, redacted. May be some new information in it.

Link to memo link

originally posted by: Greenanon
If you want to talk about Israel you have to talk about Pakistan.

Fairs fair.

I gave you the option to explain yourself... You could not. Just dug yourself a deeper hole. Why not try and answer some of my questions instead of acting like a fish out of water.

You have stated that you are privy to information about QAnon and military operations regarding Isreal. You have done this over non encrypted chat on ats PM

I will ask again what you know about Israel. I dont think you can answer. It looks like you are making stuff up.

As you said yourself you will have to wear the bull#

originally posted by: Greenanon
a reply to: purplemer

So why mention Israel when the Zionist represent the threat?

Dont reply to my several questions with another question. Go and answer my questions and I will be happy to reply.

originally posted by: purplemer

originally posted by: MostlyReading
a reply to: purplemer


Nobody who tells the lie that Julian Assange now supports censorship is a "friend" of Wikileaks. Especially when that person is unable to offer the slightest piece of information that backs up such a ludicrous claim, despite being asked for it repeatedly. Then that person is simply posting a baseless smear. Why would a "friend" of Wikileaks do that? Does that make any kind of sense to you? It sure as hell makes no sense to me.

And there is no proof that Assange is in Hawaii either. You may believe it, doesn't make it a fact.

There is nothing wrong with questioning wether JA is in control of his twitter account. The actions over the tweet where strange in my opinion.


Yes i think he is in protective custody. I follow WL very closely and there where some strange happening over the christmas period. (Between WL, AnonSCan and the US Navy) The thread is intresting. I am not sure if you can read it as its in RATS) I will post the OP here if you want a peruse.

I follow WL and Julian Assange too, and I do not believe that he is in Hawaii.

Anyway, are YOU gonna provide any kind of information about what exactly it was in "the tweet" that was "strange" and lead fluffer here to think that Assange suddenly supports censorship? Please do post your information, I would very much like to see it, thanks. You see, proof is absolutely needed when someone makes a bizarre claim like that about Julian Assange.

I'll wait.