It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
www.axios.com...
Trump national security officials are considering an unprecedented federal takeover of a portion of the nation’s mobile network to guard against China, according to sensitive documents obtained by Axios.
Two options laid out by the documents:
1 The U.S. government pays for and builds the single network — which would be an unprecedented nationalization of 'historically private infrastructure.
2 An alternative plan where wireless providers build their own 5G networks that compete with one another — though the document says the downside is it could take longer and cost more. It argues that one of the “pros” of that plan is that it would cause “less commercial disruption” to the wireless industry than the government building a network.
The best way to do this, the memo argues, is for the government to build a network itself. It would then rent access to carriers like AT&T, Verizon and T-Mobile. (A source familiar with the document's drafting told Axios this is an "old" draft and a newer version is neutral about whether the U.S. government should build and own it.)
www.axios.com... sletter&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=&stream=top-stories
AI is a big concern, but unrelated
The document talks about China’s advanced role the development of artificial intelligence.
1 That’s a serious issue, especially since U.S. companies are locked out of China (and the data to be gleaned there), while Chinese companies can take part in the U.S. market.
2 But, that has little to do with 5G wireless networks, since AI processing is done at the server level.
3 “Clearly they are two different things,” Sharma said. “AI benefits from 5G but it doesn’t require it, and there China is racing ahead.”
originally posted by: WarPig1939
5G isnt affordable and not compatible with any device yet. It took many years for 4G to be available to the public.
We just got LTE networks. There really is no need for 5G yet tbh.
originally posted by: toysforadults
make it a public utility and regulate it similar to electricity. we payed (sic) for the original infrastructure that Bell naturally monopolized to begin with
make it a public utility and regulate it similar to electricity
originally posted by: sligtlyskeptical
We need government to build it out and lease space back to providers to cover the cost. For profit companies have no incentive to do it.
originally posted by: MteWamp
I don't really know enough about the issue yet to suggest a viable solution, but I tend to think that putting the government in charge of ANYTHING in the commercial sector should be the absolute last option considered. As a general rule, letting the government be be in charge of pretty much ANY commercial venture outside of National Defense is much more likely to end up destroying or ruining it as opposed to helping it.
That being said, at this point in time there are lots of big companies that I distrust ALMOST as much. Although, all things being equal, I tend to think putting the the government in charge of ANYTHING is a recipe for absolute disaster, and generally a really, REALLY bad idea. They have a nasty tendency to to destroy anything they touch. Or at the very LEAST bloat and corrupt it enough that it's either unrecognizable or damn near unusable.
So, yeah, 99% convinced it would be a bad idea.
originally posted by: WarPig1939
5G isnt affordable and not compatible with any device yet. It took many years for 4G to be available to the public.
We just got LTE networks. There really is no need for 5G yet tbh.