Obama Lawyering Up?

a reply to: MRuss

I would suspect 9/WW would mean something else yes. Like a truncated address or name or even both : 9th street, West & Williams

/shrug that's just a rough shod guess. I doubt it means 9 lawyers world wide ; They'd not be much help to him.

I get it now....

When Trump lawyers up it's because he is innocent and being attacked.

When Obama lawyers up it's because he is guilty.

The irony and hypocrisy is reminiscent of a hot steaming pile of covfefe...believe me!

originally posted by: MRuss
a reply to: Shamrock6

I added that quote on my OP late, so yeah, I quoted myself.

But staying on topic would be kinda nice!

It was a direct reply to your comment, guy. It wasn't any more off-topic than your own comment was.

I don't have much else to add to your "flesh out this twitter post" subject though, sorry.

a reply to: MRuss

Now Q released a picture of White House stationary with a pen on top of it.

What was signed today?

a reply to: Shamrock6

I’m a girl actually.

Have you said your peace?

a reply to: olaru12

I get it now.... When Trump lawyers up it's because he is innocent and being attacked.

Want to walk that back ?

It's most likely a nothing burger

a reply to: olaru12

Not letting the trolls and Obama fans derail the thread.

We’re just speculating.

And his lawyering Up is more of a comment on the pressure that could be on him from that dang memo!

originally posted by: MRuss
Caution: in the spirit of the old ATS...

There was no debunking going on in the old ATS?

ETA:
originally posted by: MRuss

We are searching for the truth.

We’re just speculating.

O.o

originally posted by: lordcomac
I wonder if anyone will keep a count of how many people go to jail to keep obama out.

He'll get at least one from all 57 states

a reply to: CrawlingChaos

Ah, good thinking. Yes... looking up law firms

a reply to: daskakik

I don’t mind the debunking but when trolls take up an entire thread it doesn’t leave room for much discussion.

Like what I’m doing right now.

We’re speculating.

Ok?

originally posted by: MRuss
a reply to: MRuss

Now Q released a picture of White House stationary with a pen on top of it.

What was signed today?

Could you share a link where you are seeing this Q picture?

a reply to: MRuss

What is there to discuss?

There is a rumor. If true it means next to nothing and if not true it means about the same.

originally posted by: SlapMonkey
a reply to: MRuss

I guess that we'll wait and see--it's tough to decipher what's actually happening right now.

On one hand (mainly here on ATS), you have myriad threads showing how the whole Mueller investigation is beginning to crumble and redirect itself back on wrongdoings by Dems and associated parties.

On the other, you have the MSM talking about how Trump is in the crosshairs of Mueller and they act like everything is still going according to the presumed plan.

At this point for me, it's become a waiting game, as jumping to conclusions at this point will yield nothing but unproven speculation. It'll be interesting to see, though, so I've got my popcorn in the machine and am at the ready for the show...

Watching GMA this morning, you would have no idea any of the stuff on ATS even existed. They have been talking about how Mueller is going to "go after Trump", somehow. No mention of the missing text messages, the revelations with the FBI bias, the found text messages with former special council members, nothing. If I didn't check here or Drudge, I would have no idea any of this was happening, and it seems that is the plan. At some point, refusing to cover actual news stories might fall into the fake news category wouldn't it? Just manipulating public opinion by omitting facts.

BTW, who loves ya baby.

originally posted by: daskakik
a reply to: MRuss

What is there to discuss?

There is a rumor. If true it means next to nothing and if true it means about the same.

what if it's true?

Watch for pics of ankle boots and canes

a reply to: neo96

Hahahaha


Nice.


Also, the only thing this would be considered news for is that it hints he may be or become the focus of an investigation.

I'm pretty skeptical about this "lawyered up" claim, because he probably already has attorneys retained for a million different reasons. Even if he thought he was in trouble, he already has a criminal law guy somewhere, I'd bet.

So A) no idea if it's true that he suddenly retained counsel for something
B) So what? Who wouldn't?

I find the Q stuff interesting, but this is pretty meh without any other context

a reply to: network dude

Already answered in that post.

originally posted by: daskakik
a reply to: network dude

Already answered in that post.

might want to proof read that one. I was having a bit of sport with you since you made en error. But what kind of friend would I be if I didn't exploit that and generally make you look silly.

originally posted by: MRuss
According to the Twitter-verse Obama retained council today.

The source is QAnon.

That might be ridiculous news to some of you who don’t think QANon is legitimate, but it could also serve as a good test to see if he’s right.

If he is, that’s incredibly interesting news.

Let’s wait and see.

QAnon posted it on 8chan.

Sorry I can’t find the link there. But it’s all over Twitter.

Caution: in the spirit of the old ATS, some of us are going to have some fun kicking this around. I can’t stop the trolls, but it cerainly would be nice to flesh this out in peace. Those who want to kick this around with us are welcome to ignore the heavy resistance we’ll Encounter along the way.

This one?

qcodefag.github.io...