US-led 'Army of Terror' to rebuild its victim Syria to Zionist liking

The U.S. administration is training an army of terrorists in northern Syria in a total breach of the country's territorial integrity and as a direct threat to Turkey's security. In response, Ankara has the right and obligation to take all necessary action to eliminate this threat. The U.S. failed to deceive Turkey when it created a new acronym, the SDF, as a cover for the terrorist YPG, and it will not fool anyone by creating a border force. Everyone knows that the BSF is nothing but camouflage to create a separate entity in northern Syria and no one will allow it – not Turkey, not Russia, not the Syrian opposition and not the regime.

In a last ditched effort to save what's left of sovereign Syria, East-West torn Turkey vows to 'strangle' US-led regime installation in Syria 'before it's even born':

www.reuters.com...

Turkey’s Tayyip Erdogan threatened on Monday to “strangle” a planned 30,000-strong U.S.-backed force in Syria “before it’s even born,” as Washington’s backing for Kurdish fighters drove a wedge into relations with one of its main Middle East allies. The United States announced its support on Sunday for plans for a “border force” to defend territory held by U.S.-backed, Kurdish-led fighters in northern Syria. The Syrian government of President Bashar al-Assad responded on Monday by vowing to crush the new force and drive U.S. troops from the country. Assad’s ally Russia called the plans a plot to dismember Syria and place part of it under U.S. control."

Obviously in Erdogan's shoes the last thing he wants is an imperial borg at its doorstep. Perhaps beyond his own welfare though is its use of the mideast as a stepping stone or launching pad for NWO to move onto assimilating the entire asian supercontinent. For they are a rebellious house.



Meanwhile, the us/nato proxies continue to GAS Syrians like cockroaches then blame this blatant genocide of what's left of Syrians in Syria on their president Assad via MSM.

Wait. US ? I thought it was the Russians and US involvement was limited by those self-same Russians . And the Turks were against both Russia and Russian backed Syrian government. Or was Turkey against both Russia and the rebels ? Or is everyone against everyone else. Looks like the "zionist" were(are) sitting this one out.
Just and anti-US anti-Israel thread?
I like the last answer.
Someone make up my mind.....

Absolutely.. seems like most everything's going as 'planned'



Considering pretty much done with Syria (per official '7 in 5 years' deepstate quota) and poised to take on Iran..

originally posted by: Gothmog
Wait. US ? I thought it was the Russians and US involvement was limited by those self-same Russians . And the Turks were against both Russia and Russian backed Syrian government. Or was Turkey against both Russia and the rebels ? Or is everyone against everyone else. Looks like the "zionist" were(are) sitting this one out.
Just and anti-US anti-Israel thread?
I like the last answer.
Someone make up my mind.....

For the few Syrians left alive... maybe it would be best, if the rest of us "civilized" nations would quit trying to help them depopulate so quickly.

originally posted by: madmac5150

originally posted by: Gothmog
Wait. US ? I thought it was the Russians and US involvement was limited by those self-same Russians . And the Turks were against both Russia and Russian backed Syrian government. Or was Turkey against both Russia and the rebels ? Or is everyone against everyone else. Looks like the "zionist" were(are) sitting this one out.
Just and anti-US anti-Israel thread?
I like the last answer.
Someone make up my mind.....

For the few Syrians left alive... maybe it would be best, if the rest of us "civilized" nations would quit trying to help them depopulate so quickly.

Thats what I'm a thinkin

Support for Kurdistan is probably the only sane move that could be made in that region.

They go back as long as anybody (BC), and have been ravaged ceaselessly since the Sykes–Picot Agreement.

Indeed; alas Kurds claim northern Iraq way more than any part of Syria.. yet US/NATO are using them as a Pawn/Proxy to occupy East of Iraq altogether - exterminating native Syrians and in effect relocating Kurds similar to a token 'Indian Reserve Annex' but on blood bounty land that wasn't even Kurd.

Half the problems in the ME stem from how they carved the map up under Sykes–Picot Agreement.

It stands to reason that leaning towards the map before hand in cases such as Kurdistan would solve a lot of the problems there.

Assad is still standing.

ISIS is decimated.

The rest of the “rebels” aka foreign imported mercenaries who are still there, instead of running back to their nations of birth, are in tiny numbers.



Zionists lost this one. Resoundingly.
Back to the drawing board for them.

originally posted by: Hazardous1408
Assad is still standing.

ISIS is decimated.

The rest of the “rebels” aka foreign imported mercenaries who are still there, instead of running back to their nations of birth, are in tiny numbers.



Zionists lost this one. Resoundingly.
Back to the drawing board for them.

And hundreds of thousands Syrians had to die in the process. Quite a victory.

Just to think if LBJ wasn't a traitor and had actually responded to Israels bombing of the USS liberty in 1967 all this crap since 1990 would of probably never happened

originally posted by: madmac5150

originally posted by: Hazardous1408
Assad is still standing.

ISIS is decimated.

The rest of the “rebels” aka foreign imported mercenaries who are still there, instead of running back to their nations of birth, are in tiny numbers.



Zionists lost this one. Resoundingly.
Back to the drawing board for them.

And hundreds of thousands Syrians had to die in the process. Quite a victory.

Tragically true.

But I didn’t call it a victory. For anyone.
Nobody can win a war when innocent lives are lost in the process.

Wars are ended. Not won.

originally posted by: khnum
Just to think if LBJ wasn't a traitor and had actually responded to Israels bombing of the USS liberty in 1967 all this crap since 1990 would of probably never happened

What type of response would have been successful, do you think?

Keeping in mind the Samson Option, while you think of an answer.

originally posted by: Hazardous1408

originally posted by: madmac5150

originally posted by: Hazardous1408
Assad is still standing.

ISIS is decimated.

The rest of the “rebels” aka foreign imported mercenaries who are still there, instead of running back to their nations of birth, are in tiny numbers.



Zionists lost this one. Resoundingly.
Back to the drawing board for them.

And hundreds of thousands Syrians had to die in the process. Quite a victory.

Tragically true.

But I didn’t call it a victory. For anyone.
Nobody can win a war when innocent lives are lost in the process.

Wars are ended. Not won.

"Violence is a disease... you don't cure a disease, by spreading it..."

Thank you "Game of Thrones", for that quote.

a reply to: Hazardous1408

Crucifiction,beheading,sex slavery,organ harvesting all by entities trained by the west,there are things worse than a quick death Syrians have experienced and the good guys are Iranians,Hezbullah and Russia,my government no longer has my support after our misadventures here.This whole adventure disgusts me.

a reply to: Hazardous1408

In 1967 they could not of reached the continental USA so you could of fired at will

originally posted by: khnum
a reply to: Hazardous1408

In 1967 they could not of reached the continental USA so you could of fired at will

Looks like they had become capable of doing just that.
That very same year, in fact.
mobile.nytimes.com...

Perhaps a reason why USS Liberty incident occurred when it did, knowing they’d attained a position of “unattackable”.
Wonders never cease!

a reply to: Hazardous1408

Mount Sinai is a long way from Washington if they did have an ICBM by 1967 Id be surprised yes they were investigating nuclear weapons Kennedy wanted to inspect their nuclear plant and register the equivalent at the time of AIPAC as a foreign agent,had he survived you would of seen a different response.

Turkey are afraid of a Kurdish state popping up out of the ashes. The Kurds in Iraq held back the tide after the Iraqi army ran away, and before the US and co. had mobilised to prevent a collapse of Iraq.

The Kurds are an oppressed minority in Turkey and Iran. They had decades of victimisation under Assad in Syria and were severely repressed by Saddam in Iraq. In the last three decades the Kurds in Iraq are the only group to have gained a semblance of freedom.

Turkey hates their Kurds and will find any excuse to push them into the ground.

a reply to: paraphi

Hmong,Montagaurds,Karen,Cubans....trust the US- West at your own risk.