Vertitas video; Twitter shadow bans pro trump people

a reply to: Grambler

All you'll ever do is waste precious time with that one. Nothings more valuable in life than time.

originally posted by: Grambler
a reply to: introvert

Nope. I will not let you weasel out of your BS.

I never claimed what you said and you cannot quote me saying it.

You cannot provide a source stating Fusion's intent was to smear Trump as a pedo.

Can you provide any proof that the people you are calling sick on the Q thread that need to be kicked in the teeth as to what their intent is?

They openly discuss it in the damn thread. They think they are exposing some grand conspiracy, which includes some vast pedo ring. But they are careful what they openly discuss because they do no want it get shut down like the Pizza nonsense.

I also have PM's from certain people on the issue that I am not allowed to post.

These people are taking that conspiracy to amazing levels of disgusting and some even claim that they are in direct contact with Q himself.

a reply to: aethertek

That's exactly right, "conservatives" should boycott social media because of their censorship, beside there are plenty of other platforms for the "conservatives" to post on.

The klanazis moved over to the Russian servers when they got kicked to the curb, I'm sure "conservatives" would feel right at home there.

K~

Right, and "progressives" would feel right at home sucking on the teet of vast corporations so long as "conservatives" weren't about. The irony.

a reply to: introvert

Yes you have super secret evidence of a grand conspiracy on ats where you know the intent of all of those people that need their teeth kicked in.

Please post proof the the people you are saying deserve violence of what their intent is.

a reply to: Grambler

We have congressional groups saying russian trolls on social media are a huge threat to the country. If thats the case, how much more of a threat is the companies themselves censoring right wing content.

I've thought about this long and hard and frankly, at least at the moment, I don't think its much of a threat. For my part, I'm a moderate cynic. But my relatives and the people in my community are either way right wing or way left wing. From what I've seen of those who are moderate to right wing, they don't believe much of anything that comes out the MSM and many don't use Farcebook or Twitter or even Youtube for that matter. As for the Leftists? What's one more room of confirmation bias got to do with it. They drink their tea while listening to the endless Leftist propaganda stream out NPR in the morning anyway........they're committed Kool Aid drinkers, "no thought needed".

Oddly enough, most of my more educated moderate type friends and acquaintences "get" their news from sources like the Wall Street Journal, CNBC (business news), One America News, and the local news channel. Most haven't watched either Fox or CNN in ages.

So, yea, the Net will be just another Leftist propaganda outlet and then after a while, even the Net won't be much of a "thing" anymore. I mean, really, who reads Huffington Post anymore?

originally posted by: introvert
originally posted by: Grambler
a reply to: introvert

Nope. I will not let you weasel out of your BS.

I never claimed what you said and you cannot quote me saying it.

You cannot provide a source stating Fusion's intent was to smear Trump as a pedo.

Can you provide any proof that the people you are calling sick on the Q thread that need to be kicked in the teeth as to what their intent is?

They openly discuss it in the damn thread. They think they are exposing some grand conspiracy, which includes some vast pedo ring. But they are careful what they openly discuss because they do no want it get shut down like the Pizza nonsense.

I also have PM's from certain people on the issue that I am not allowed to post.

These people are taking that conspiracy to amazing levels of disgusting and some even claim that they are in direct contact with Q himself.

you really sound like you are obsessed with this topic like it offends you deeply and personally. Me too. I never have understood the draw to moloch worship. Even the fringe, milder and less offensive parts for new adepts like kiddie porn and pedophilia. I guess you have to aquire a taste before the gourmet senses activate. As for your Q obsession. That's just weird!

When my kids are in their 40's, and free speech is something completely different than what we know, I hope they can forgive the stupidity of their elders.

Why anyone would turn a blind eye, or show indifference to this astounds me.

In ANY era of western society, the reduction of speech on ANY major platform should be fought by EVERYONE! For any liberal society, the silencing of voices is anathema to liberty... through government of private.

Twitter didn't begin as pink lefty treehouse. There was no sign out-front that said "wing nuts not allowed"

sick, ignorant, partisan, obtuse...
Some of you need to hurry up and have some birthdays...

a reply to: Grambler


I wouldn't be caught dead on any of these sites. Not only do they have their own sneaky agendas, but they have been enablers of extra-judicial communication intercepts as well as enablers of the continued erosion of our freedoms.

These companies are far too shady for me. They shouldn't be allowed by law to posses personal private data. Communications data should be encrypted with a key only you posses, which would mitigate many attack vectors for theft of this data. Of course they'd never do it because then they couldn't use your private data for their own financial gain, nor could they enable unlawful/unwarranted mass surveillance by an overreaching government. God forbid.

a reply to: Grambler

Yes you have super secret evidence of a grand conspiracy on ats where you know the intent of all of those people that need their teeth kicked in.

Please post proof the the people you are saying deserve violence of what their intent is.

I've said no such thing. Where did I say I have super secret evidence? I also said look at the thread. I even called-out one member in that thread that sent me the messages. So it's no secret.

By the way, I notice you are not defending yourself and your false claims. I take it, for the 2nd day in a row, we can safely assume you admit you are a liar. Well, no need to admit it. We have proof.

You claim I said things I never did.

You also have not posted evidence of your claims towards Fusion and Trump.

Bad track record you are building so far. Perhaps your lying is becoming pathological.

originally posted by: bulwarkz

originally posted by: introvert
originally posted by: Grambler
a reply to: introvert

Nope. I will not let you weasel out of your BS.

I never claimed what you said and you cannot quote me saying it.

You cannot provide a source stating Fusion's intent was to smear Trump as a pedo.

Can you provide any proof that the people you are calling sick on the Q thread that need to be kicked in the teeth as to what their intent is?

They openly discuss it in the damn thread. They think they are exposing some grand conspiracy, which includes some vast pedo ring. But they are careful what they openly discuss because they do no want it get shut down like the Pizza nonsense.

I also have PM's from certain people on the issue that I am not allowed to post.

These people are taking that conspiracy to amazing levels of disgusting and some even claim that they are in direct contact with Q himself.

you really sound like you are obsessed with this topic like it offends you deeply and personally. Me too. I never have understood the draw to moloch worship. Even the fringe, milder and less offensive parts for new adepts like kiddie porn and pedophilia. I guess you have to aquire a taste before the gourmet senses activate. As for your Q obsession. That's just weird!

So I am willing to call shenanigans on these people creating a conspiracy accusing people of some very nasty things, and it's an obsession?

I'm sorry. I did not know that it was ok on ATS to create conspiracies as serious as that and defend those that make such accusations without evidence.

This is why liberals get a bad rap. Unless you agree with them, they will try and censor your viewpoints, and if they can't censor your views, they will just ridicule you instead.


I don't like liberals, and I never will. Liberalism is a mental disorder at best.

a reply to: introvert

Keep deflecting.

I prove you wrong over and over and over, and its always fun.

You said anyone who pushed salacious allegations of sexuality were sick and should be kicked in the teeth, I a direct repsonse to me showing fusion tried to smear trump as connected to pedophile epstein.

Then you back down from your claims saying that unless I can prove the intent of Fusion, then you are not referencing them.

As if fusion had another reason to connect trump to a pedophile.

Again, you squirm to excuse people against trump of doing the same thing you accuse others of doing.

So your standard now is it is A ok for people to smear anyone as connected to pedophiles, as long as we dont know their intent is actually calling that person connected to the pedophile a pedophile.

So again, you are saying people deserve violence, so prove their intent.

a reply to: Grambler

A private company enforcing their own rules. Who cares?

And the source, Project Whocares are manipulative jackoffs.

originally posted by: Grambler
a reply to: introvert

Keep deflecting.

I prove you wrong over and over and over, and its always fun.

You said anyone who pushed salacious allegations of sexuality were sick and should be kicked in the teeth, I a direct repsonse to me showing fusion tried to smear trump as connected to pedophile epstein.

Then you back down from your claims saying that unless I can prove the intent of Fusion, then you are refencing them.

As if fusion had another reason to connect trump to a pedophile.

Again, you squirm to excuse people agianst trump of doing the same thing you accuse others of doing.

So your standard now is it is A ok for people to smear anyone as connected to pedophiles, as long as we dont know thier intent is actually calling that person connected ot the epdophile a pedophile.

So again, you are saying people deserve violence, so prove thier inetent.

We find ourselves in an interesting position. You made up false claims, lied about what I said and as we laughably witnessed yesterday, will create nonsense out of thin air. Instead of addressing it...you just carry on and try to focus more of your lies on to me.

So I have to ask myself, why would I continue to argue with someone that has less integrity than the paper I use to wipe my ass?

Answer is: I wont.

Not that it matters, but I will add you to the list of people, which now makes 3, that I will not respond to anymore.

There are only two types of people worse than a person that messes with kids. A thief and a liar. You've proven yourself to be a liar. I will no longer associate myself with a liar, such as yourself.

Good day.

a reply to: introvert

Good bye.

I wish you the best.

originally posted by: Swills
a reply to: Grambler

A private company enforcing their own rules. Who cares?

And the source, Project Whocares are manipulative jackoffs.

A private company that serves the public.

originally posted by: Swills
a reply to: Grambler

A private company enforcing their own rules. Who cares?

And the source, Project Whocares are manipulative jackoffs.

Well then...

I guess you are exempt from any further need to think.

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: Swills
a reply to: Grambler

A private company enforcing their own rules. Who cares?

And the source, Project Whocares are manipulative jackoffs.

A private company that serves the public.

Bingo.

Twitter can ban people that doesnt fit its mold, but science forbid a Christian bakery not bake a gay dildo cake.

a reply to: introvert

Actually you are wrong about that,imo.There are not 2 types of people worse than people who mess with kids.THERE IS NO TYPE OF PERSON WORSE THAN THE TYPE WHO MESSES WITH KIDS.

originally posted by: introvert

originally posted by: Grambler

originally posted by: introvert
a reply to: IgnoranceIsntBlisss

The best argument you have is memes?

And you people wonder why your intelligence is questioned?

Ill take memes over your constant insults any day.

I'd take anything other than the constant barrage of false equivalencies and utter stupidity.

A lot of them seem pretty equivalent to me, but hey it's a pretty turn of phrase and makes you sound smart :shrug: