It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
We have a sworn declaration from David Hardy who is the chief FOIA officer of the FBI that we obtained just in the last few days, and in that sworn declaration, Mr. Hardy says that all of Comey's memos - all of them, were classified at the time they were written, and they remain classified. -Chris Farrell, Judicial Watch
but all evidence suggests he's little more than a political hack.
originally posted by: stosh64
a reply to: Grambler
With all the evidence coming out recently about just how deep the Dem corruption went leading up to and during the last election, it is no wonder the new gossip book is suddenly thrust into the spotlight.
Sheeple attention span isn't very long.
originally posted by: luthier
a reply to: butcherguy
Or or or...
Yeah no kidding. That is the point.
No information has been given..
Judicial watch allegedly filed an foia but won't release the information.
It amounts to we have it trust us.
Personally I am so sick of the partisan speculations from the right and the left. I would love to know the truth but...divide an conquer seems to be the plan.
originally posted by: Grambler
We have a sworn declaration from David Hardy who is the chief FOIA officer of the FBI that we obtained just in the last few days, and in that sworn declaration, Mr. Hardy says that all of Comey's memos - all of them, were classified at the time they were written, and they remain classified. -Chris Farrell, Judicial Watch
www.zerohedge.com...
If true Mr comey may be in some serious trouble.
Its funny, so many people on ats exclaimed how honest and smart comey was.
They said he was a lawyer, and wouldn't do something stupid like admit to leaking classified info.
Well if the fbis own head of freedom of info act officer has admitted that these memos were classified, it turns out he wasn't very bright.
That is admission to leaking classified info to hurt a sitting President.
Perhaps judicial watch is full of it, but of not, things are going to get very interesting for mr Comey.
If they were accurate, and I know they are, it still means Trump is guilty of obstruction.
He may have been aiding and abetting treasonous activities by others, with full knowledge of what he was doing.
From prosecuting the Mafia and Martha Stewart to helping change the Bush administration's policies on torture and electronic surveillance, overseeing the Hillary Clinton e-mail investigation as well as ties between the Trump campaign and Russia, Comey has been involved in some of the most consequential cases and policies of recent history.
The current policy traces its roots to the administration of former President Bill Clinton.
originally posted by: shooterbrody
If they were accurate, and I know they are, it still means Trump is guilty of obstruction.
That is the funniest thing I have read all day.
Thanks for that!
originally posted by: pavil
originally posted by: luthier
a reply to: butcherguy
Or or or...
Yeah no kidding. That is the point.
No information has been given..
Judicial watch allegedly filed an foia but won't release the information.
It amounts to we have it trust us.
Personally I am so sick of the partisan speculations from the right and the left. I would love to know the truth but...divide an conquer seems to be the plan.
JW has been one of the drivers of forcing the Govt. to release info via FOIA cases. Their record is pretty good on that, albeit pretty partisan.
If this is proven true, Comey is in a world of hurt.
It will make all his pious posts look hilarious.