FBI launches new Clinton Foundation investigation

originally posted by: Skyfloating
Fire in the Clintons house. One day later, investigation. Maybe they tried to burn evidence.

No we sorted out that was they burnt the full sized human body cake, their spirit cooking party was toast.

a reply to: FamCore

I still think she will end up decomposing before she ends up serving time in any sort of institution no matter how deserved.

I continue to hold out hope that she eventually faces consequences for her actions though.



Thank you all to those of you whom are enjoying the thread; special thanks to kurt for the bumps.

Why are you talking about Trumps tax returns?

originally posted by: Skyfloating
Fire in the Clintons house. One day later, investigation. Maybe they tried to burn evidence.

Or they are just investigating to see if the Clinton's are arsonist's?
Wouldn't that be a funny way to bring them down?

originally posted by: Skyfloating
Fire in the Clintons house. One day later, investigation. Maybe they tried to burn evidence.

Pouring vodka in a wire-mesh trash can, and lighting it didn't work for Hillary last time. You'd think she learned her lesson.

originally posted by: samuelsson
Why are you talking about Trumps tax returns?

It's like groundhog day...pretty soon it'll come back around to those pink hats being the thing again.

Let me know when an arrest is made otherwise this just isn't new in my world.

a reply to: Vasa Croe

That's a good possibility.

I did find this:

However, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3293, a ten-year statute of limitations applies to RICO charges where the racketeering activity involves a violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1344 -- bank fraud.

CRIMINAL RICO:
18 U.S.C. §§1961-1968
A Manual For
Federal Prosecutors

FYI that foundation is worth over $2 billion dollars.

And most of it's spent 'overseas'.

www.washingtontimes.com...

IMO that foundation is nothing but a racketeering and money laundering outfit.

a reply to: jadedANDcynical

Very good!


Although when it comes to war crimes & corruption there should be zero statute of limitations.

originally posted by: jadedANDcynical
a reply to: Vasa Croe

That's a good possibility.

I did find this:

However, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3293, a ten-year statute of limitations applies to RICO charges where the racketeering activity involves a violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1344 -- bank fraud.

CRIMINAL RICO:
18 U.S.C. §§1961-1968
A Manual For
Federal Prosecutors

Bingo!

That's how their hitting all the prostitution rings. A neighbor, next door, of my folks got busted for it Jan 2017 and has RICO charges. Crazy thing is he seemed like a decent guy. Then one day he gets arrested and 2 months later his wife kills herself.

Pretty sure I told you that Thomas Fanning lives a couple houses down from them as well.

Seem their hood is a bit more lively than I thought....

What a day for Hillary's bad news...

She should have stayed in the woods.

A few thoughts on the statutes...
If she lied to the FBI in 2016, five years from then.

If any of the crossovers like Abedin or Mills working for
both lied in 2016, ten years from then.

Even going back to The Benghazi investigation,
five years has not expired, so maybe we will see
a bit of justice finally?

Well remember what all of the anti trumpets have been telling us.

If there is an fbi investigation, there HAS to be wrong doing.

And remember anyone who doesn't fully support the fbis investigation is hurting America

a reply to: Vasa Croe

Yeah, I somewhat remember that.

20 years

18 U.S.C. 668 (major art theft)136

10 years

18 U.S.C. § 81 (arson in the special maritime or territorial jurisdiction of the United States not involving a risk of death or serious injury)*137
18 U.S.C. § 215 (receipt by financial institution officials of commissions or gifts for procuring loans)**138
18 U.S.C. § 656 (theft, embezzlement, or misapplication by bank officer or employee)**
18 U.S.C. § 657 (embezzlement by lending, credit and insurance institution officers or employees)**
18 U.S.C. § 844(f) (burning or bombing federal property not involving a risk of death or serious injury)*
18 U.S.C. § 844(h) (carrying explosives during the commission of a federal offense or using fire or explosives to commit a federal offense)*
18 U.S.C. § 844 (i) (burning or bombing property used in or used in activities affecting commerce not involving a risk of death or serious injury)*
18 U.S.C. § 1005 (fraud concerning bank entries, reports and transactions)**
18 U.S.C. § 1006 (fraud concerning federal credit institution entries, reports and transactions)**
18 U.S.C. § 1007 (fraud concerning Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation transactions)**
18 U.S.C. § 1014 (fraud concerning loan and credit applications generally; renewals and discounts; crop insurance)**
18 U.S.C. § 1033 (crimes by or affecting persons engaged in the business of insurance)**
18 U.S.C. § 1344 (bank fraud)**
18 U.S.C. § 1341 (mail fraud affecting a financial institution)**
18 U.S.C. § 1343 (wire fraud affecting a financial institution)**
18 U.S.C. § 1423 (misuse of evidence of citizenship or naturalization) (or conspiracy to commit)+139
18 U.S.C. § 1424 (personation or misuse of papers in naturalization proceedings) (or conspiracy to commit)+
18 U.S.C. § 1425 (procurement of citizenship or naturalization unlawfully) (or conspiracy to commit)+
18 U.S.C. § 1426 (reproduction of naturalization or citizenship papers) (or conspiracy to commit)+
18 U.S.C. § 1427 (sale of naturalization or citizenship papers) (or conspiracy to commit)+
18 U.S.C. § 1428 (surrender of canceled naturalization certificate) (or conspiracy to commit)+
18 U.S.C. § 1541 (passport or visa issuance without authority) (or conspiracy to commit)+
18 U.S.C. § 1542 (false statement in application and use of passport) (or conspiracy to commit)+
18 U.S.C. § 1543 (forgery or false use of passport) (or conspiracy to commit)+
18 U.S.C. § 1544 (misuse of passport) (or conspiracy to commit)+
18 U.S.C. § 1581 (peonage; obstruction of justice)++140
18 U.S.C. §1583 (enticement into slavery)++
18 U.S.C. § 1584 (sale into involuntary servitude)++
18 U.S.C. § 1589 (forced labor)++
18 U.S.C. § 1590 (slave trafficking)++
18 U.S.C. § 1592 (document offenses involving slave trafficking)++
18 U.S.C. § 1963 (RICO violation involving bank fraud)**
18 U.S.C. § 2442 (recruiting or using child soldiers)141
42 U.S.C. § 2274 (communication of restricted data)†142
42 U.S.C. § 2275 (receipt of restricted data)†
42 U.S.C. § 2276 (tampering with restricted data)†
50 U.S.C. § 783 (disclosure of classified information (with suspension until the end of any federal
employment of the accused))143

Statute of Limitation in Federal Criminal Cases: An Overview(direct .pdf link)

originally posted by: carewemust

originally posted by: kurthall
a reply to: jadedANDcynical

Let me know when trump releases his tax returns.

Will knowing what's in them improve your life, in some meaningful way?

When you are a Liberal, your life can't get any worse.
The only way to go is up.

originally posted by: carewemust
I thought the FBI was still in tatters.

This is them trying to redeem themselves.

a reply to: Arnie123

Both FBIanon and Qanon have said that there are still patriots in the agencies, just that the corrupt had gotten themselves so entrenched that there was nothing the white hats could do.

Things seem to have turned around now, though, and there might be some hope on the horizon.

originally posted by: intrptr

originally posted by: IgnoranceIsntBlisss

The officials, who spoke only on condition of anonymity, said the probe is examining whether the Clintons promised or performed any policy favors in return for largesse to their charitable efforts or whether donors made commitments of donations in hopes of securing government outcomes.

They just need to read ATS. It's all -in here-.

Looking for needles in a stack of needles. They just need more money to squander or need to pronounce her not guilty, once and for all.



And this time , it will stick...

You don't seriously believe what you wrote do you?

originally posted by: burntheships
What a day for Hillary's bad news...

She should have stayed in the woods.

A few thoughts on the statutes...
If she lied to the FBI in 2016, five years from then.

If any of the crossovers like Abedin or Mills working for
both lied in 2016, ten years from then.

Even going back to The Benghazi investigation,
five years has not expired, so maybe we will see
a bit of justice finally?

What if they can be tied to the trafficking rings that are currently being taken down? I assume their exposure would be mostly thru financial crimes, but that would be for events that likely were continuing up until Nov. 8th, 2016.

a reply to: jadedANDcynical

I also really wonder about the latest 'suicide' of the lead surgeon
in Haiti working with The Foundation. He supposedly stabbed himself to death.

Surgeon Linked to Haiti and Mentioned in Wikileaks Clinton Email Is Found Dead … After Stabbing Himself in the Chest(?)