It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: wtfatta
We all have a responsibility if I'm going to try to lay blame at anyones feet. China's CO2 is definitely a factor but imagine how mitigated things would be if we hadn't harvested ~250 million acres of filters.
Your post history tells us you lean right, as does your screen name.
It is no hoax that CO2 levels are rising as a direct result of human activity.
What is being cited by the vast majority of scientists is the result of observation and analysis of the data by highly trained individuals. What you have presented is opinion. I was merely pointing out the irony in the nature of your presentation.
originally posted by: notsure1
originally posted by: JohnnyCanuck
originally posted by: notsure1
originally posted by: JohnnyCanuck
originally posted by: notsure1
Lol those guys can barley predict whether its or not its going to rain tomorrow.
But yeah 100 yearss from now..
I'm not sure what barley has to do with it, but way to call out those stupid scientists! Good job!
Pretty obvious keyboard error. IS grammar nazi a full time job?
Well, here's the deal. There are a good half dozen grammatical errors in that paragraph. I am merely pointing out the irony inherent in calling out scientists in a barely literate manner. Hey...they made a movie about that!
As to shots at Trudeau? Sure...that's on topic!
But do enjoy the weather.
As to grammatical errors yeah thats on topic. You lefties are such hypocrites.
originally posted by: Xtrozero
originally posted by: wtfatta
We all have a responsibility if I'm going to try to lay blame at anyones feet. China's CO2 is definitely a factor but imagine how mitigated things would be if we hadn't harvested ~250 million acres of filters.
We as in the world or US? Once again trees are a renewable resource and there are more in the US than 100 years ago, but then we look at rain forests and other places that get wiped clean for crops...how do you handle that?
originally posted by: testingtesting
a reply to: DerBeobachter
Do you think the trumpa lumpas will ever say "right that's the final straw!".
I don't they will follow him off a cliff if he jumped.
originally posted by: testingtesting
a reply to: DerBeobachter
Do you think the trumpa lumpas will ever say "right that's the final straw!".
I don't they will follow him off a cliff if he jumped.
originally posted by: JohnnyCanuck
What is being cited by the vast majority of scientists is the result of observation and analysis of the data by highly trained individuals. What you have presented is opinion. I was merely pointing out the irony in the nature of your presentation.
originally posted by: notsure1
originally posted by: JohnnyCanuck
originally posted by: notsure1
originally posted by: JohnnyCanuck
originally posted by: notsure1
Lol those guys can barley predict whether its or not its going to rain tomorrow.
But yeah 100 yearss from now..
I'm not sure what barley has to do with it, but way to call out those stupid scientists! Good job!
Pretty obvious keyboard error. IS grammar nazi a full time job?
Well, here's the deal. There are a good half dozen grammatical errors in that paragraph. I am merely pointing out the irony inherent in calling out scientists in a barely literate manner. Hey...they made a movie about that!
As to shots at Trudeau? Sure...that's on topic!
But do enjoy the weather.
As to grammatical errors yeah thats on topic. You lefties are such hypocrites.
Polish it up and you might wish to present a paper at the next climate conference. You know...or not.
originally posted by: EvidenceNibbler
originally posted by: JohnnyCanuck
What is being cited by the vast majority of scientists is the result of observation and analysis of the data by highly trained individuals. What you have presented is opinion. I was merely pointing out the irony in the nature of your presentation.
originally posted by: notsure1
originally posted by: JohnnyCanuck
originally posted by: notsure1
originally posted by: JohnnyCanuck
originally posted by: notsure1
Lol those guys can barley predict whether its or not its going to rain tomorrow.
But yeah 100 yearss from now..
I'm not sure what barley has to do with it, but way to call out those stupid scientists! Good job!
Pretty obvious keyboard error. IS grammar nazi a full time job?
Well, here's the deal. There are a good half dozen grammatical errors in that paragraph. I am merely pointing out the irony inherent in calling out scientists in a barely literate manner. Hey...they made a movie about that!
As to shots at Trudeau? Sure...that's on topic!
But do enjoy the weather.
As to grammatical errors yeah thats on topic. You lefties are such hypocrites.
Polish it up and you might wish to present a paper at the next climate conference. You know...or not.
Still parroting the consensus myth? That has been debunked long ago.
www.populartechnology.net...
97 Articles Refuting The "97% Consensus"
originally posted by: lakenheath24
Hmmm,
Looks like the sun is more responsible for climate change than we are. Now we MAY have an ice age in 2030, not because I farted, but because the sun has 10 and 90-year cycles that affect sunspots. I don't think that we are the biggest factor in climate change, but that does not mean I wouldn't like to see us clean up the planet and use some green technology.
The population explosion since the industrial revolution in extraordinary, and is the biggest problem we face. At some point the planet will not cope and we will all be destroyed, only to grow back to where we are today in a million years or so. I am willing to bet that that cycle has played out many times over the past billions of years.
astronomynow.com...
originally posted by: EvidenceNibbler
a reply to: DerBeobachter
Where is the evidence that he is wrong, do you have proof that changes in the climate are caused by mans activities?