It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
This was not the first time Obama had granted funding to the Palestinian Authority despite Congress’s wishes. In 2012, for example, he unblocked nearly $200 million that had been frozen in response to Palestinians’ unilateral actions at the United Nations, using a legal waiver included in the Palestinian Accountability Act.
Republicans have increasingly called for blocking or canceling funding to the Palestinian Authority, not only because of unilateral diplomatic moves toward statehood, but also because of increasing evidence that funds are used to incite violence and provide financial rewards to terrorists.
He's histories greatest traitor.
originally posted by: grey580
a reply to: EvidenceNibbler
Not even close.
He's histories greatest traitor.
Benedict Arnold and Aaron Burr still beat him out.
originally posted by: EvidenceNibbler
originally posted by: grey580
a reply to: EvidenceNibbler
Not even close.
He's histories greatest traitor.
Benedict Arnold and Aaron Burr still beat him out.
Can you answer the question in the OP? Why would Obama be giving hundreds of millions of dollars to Palestine?
originally posted by: Bluntone22
originally posted by: EvidenceNibbler
originally posted by: grey580
a reply to: EvidenceNibbler
Not even close.
He's histories greatest traitor.
Benedict Arnold and Aaron Burr still beat him out.
Can you answer the question in the OP? Why would Obama be giving hundreds of millions of dollars to Palestine?
Maybe because he believes in their cause and did what he could to help them.
Agree with him or not, but that's probably why
originally posted by: CulturalResilience
I was never under the illusion that so many seemed to be under regarding this politician. I did not think his skin colour automatically meant that he was going to be a straight up and down honest guy, and could not figure out why so many others seemed to believe that.
You mean Obama supported Hamas? Aren't they some kinda terrorist organization?
originally posted by: DerBeobachter
originally posted by: CulturalResilience
I was never under the illusion that so many seemed to be under regarding this politician. I did not think his skin colour automatically meant that he was going to be a straight up and down honest guy, and could not figure out why so many others seemed to believe that.
He was chosen by the real rulers behind the curtain to play the Potus because of his skin color. To fool the people. So that the same old game could go on, without being disturbed. Because the people were distracted by the fact that even in one of the most racist countries on earth a black person could become Potus. People thought: Wow, the states are getting better, maybe now really become the land of opportunity, for everybody that lives there.
People really thought times would change to a better, with a Potus and his wrong toothpast smile stolen right from a cheap TV ad. They had false hope, created by a mass media hype. That, in turn, was created by the same rich and powerful rulers(the punters of the presstitutes) behind the curtains, that chose Obama as Potus. Or any other Potus actor before and since that.
While the "U"SA did what it ever did and does, since at least 1945.
It doesn´t matter who plays the Potus, of which of the two allegedly very different parties with allegedly very different goals(both make the rich richer, where is the difference?) the Potus puppet(of the oligarchs and military industrial complex) is member at that time.
If it wouldn´t have been Obama who played Potus at that time and gave that money to the palestinians, it would have been done by an other Potus actor. Because such actions are always for the profits of the real rulers behind the curtains. The moneyed aristocracy and the military industrial complex!
originally posted by: EvidenceNibbler
originally posted by: Bluntone22
originally posted by: EvidenceNibbler
originally posted by: grey580
a reply to: EvidenceNibbler
Not even close.
He's histories greatest traitor.
Benedict Arnold and Aaron Burr still beat him out.
Can you answer the question in the OP? Why would Obama be giving hundreds of millions of dollars to Palestine?
Maybe because he believes in their cause and did what he could to help them.
Agree with him or not, but that's probably why
You mean Obama supported Hamas? Aren't they some kinda terrorist organization?
originally posted by: Eshel
a reply to: EvidenceNibbler
You mean Obama supported Hamas? Aren't they some kinda terrorist organization?
Palestine and Hamas are not the same thing.
Elections for the second Palestinian Legislative Council (PLC), the legislature of the Palestinian National Authority (PNA), were held on 25 January 2006. The result was a victory for Hamas
originally posted by: EvidenceNibbler
originally posted by: Eshel
a reply to: EvidenceNibbler
You mean Obama supported Hamas? Aren't they some kinda terrorist organization?
Palestine and Hamas are not the same thing.
Oh, they are not the same thing? I thought the Palestine Authority, that they are run by Hamas???
Elections for the second Palestinian Legislative Council (PLC), the legislature of the Palestinian National Authority (PNA), were held on 25 January 2006. The result was a victory for Hamas
en.wikipedia.org...
WAKE UP
originally posted by: EvidenceNibbler
originally posted by: grey580
a reply to: EvidenceNibbler
Not even close.
He's histories greatest traitor.
Benedict Arnold and Aaron Burr still beat him out.
Can you answer the question in the OP? Why would Obama be giving hundreds of millions of dollars to Palestine?
originally posted by: grey580
a reply to: EvidenceNibbler
He's histories greatest traitor.
Not even close.
Benedict Arnold and Aaron Burr still beat him out.