Quentin Tarantino Set to Maul Star Trek to Death

Quentin Tarantino Developing 'Star Trek' Film (With Help from J.J. Abrams): Report - Space.com

"The only thing that limited them was their '60s budget and eight-day shooting schedule," Tarantino said in a 2015 Nerdist interview. "You could take some of the classic Star Trek episodes and easily expand them to 90 minutes or more and really do some amazing, amazing stuff."

JJ Abrams didn’t do a horrible job with the Kelvin timeline Star Trek. But now we’re gonna add one trick pony d-bag Quentin Tarantino into the mix?
So we’re just gonna move away from the science advocacy, diplomacy, and the role of the Federation in galactic events, and dive right into a Tarantino bloodbath with zero story line?

Sorry but I don't trust Tarantino to make a good Trek film.

Sure to be a veritable bloodbath
.
Is like shatner to have a few spastic lines too

originally posted by: projectvxn
Quentin Tarantino Developing 'Star Trek' Film (With Help from J.J. Abrams): Report - Space.com

"The only thing that limited them was their '60s budget and eight-day shooting schedule," Tarantino said in a 2015 Nerdist interview. "You could take some of the classic Star Trek episodes and easily expand them to 90 minutes or more and really do some amazing, amazing stuff."

JJ Abrams didn’t do a horrible job with the Kelvin timeline Star Trek. But now we’re gonna add one trick pony d-bag Quentin Tarantino into the mix?
So we’re just gonna move away from the science advocacy, diplomacy, and the role of the Federation in galactic events, and dive right into a Tarantino bloodbath with zero story line?

Sorry but I don't trust Tarantino to make a good Trek film.

So Samuel L. Jackson will be cruising around busting Klingons with his ship the USS Bad Mother#er? This may actually be better than Abram's Star Trek.

I don't know about Quentin Tarentino making a Star Trek movie. His movies always have a surreal, over the top, comic booky feel to them I don't know if Star Trek would be a good fit.

A movie set in the Star Wars universe about some bounty hunters or something by him would be pretty cool though.

originally posted by: projectvxn


Sorry but I don't trust Tarantino to make a good Trek film.

He did a damn good job on the CSI episode he directed. I think he'll be what's needed in the new ST. Character development.

a reply to: projectvxn


Love Taratino. If he added some Jedi I might even go see it.

You never know with Tarintino. We might even see Q.

a reply to: intrepid


Is a 'Q' someone getting their brains smashed out? If so, this could be the greatest Star Trek since the one with all those hairpieces that kept multiplying.

originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus
a reply to: intrepid


Is a 'Q' someone getting their brains smashed out? If so, this could be the greatest Star Trek since the one with all those hairpieces that kept multiplying.

Tribbles! Dammit! Tribbles!

Dissapointed by you brother....

a reply to: projectvxn

so finally there is going to be a star trek movie worth a #.?
about time

tarantino is going to knock it out of the park like he always does.
even his couple of kind of # movies are far better than most

a reply to: theatreboy


I thought tribbles were what baseball players got when they hit the ball and got to third.

a reply to: AugustusMasonicus


No, it is what they do when they bounce it down the court to shoot it in the hoop thingy.

a reply to: projectvxn

Sorry but I don't trust Tarantino to make a good Trek film.

Depends on his ideas about "amazing". The film Wrath of Kahn was good follow on.

I could see some other early episodes getting a second helping, if its done right.

Original trek episodes greatest draw were the story lines. Thats what was so easy about making the early episodes they had good plots.

Early sci fi puts modern tripe to shame.

Go Quinton...

originally posted by: intrepid

originally posted by: projectvxn


Sorry but I don't trust Tarantino to make a good Trek film.

He did a damn good job on the CSI episode he directed. I think he'll be what's needed in the new ST. Character development.

He might surprise me. But his usual style irritates me and I just have a bad feeling about Mr. Bloodbath making a Star Trek film considering the STD that is STD. At least JJ Abrams' Kelvin timeline wasn't so awful as to be unrecognizable as a Star Trek film.

a reply to: projectvxn


Honestly, I expect to see Tarantino fall soon. He was very close with Weinstein....

a reply to: projectvxn

If the movie doesn't have Samuel L. Jackson in it I will be very disappointed.

As far as I'm concerned the JJ Abrams Star Trek movies are crap.

This would only make them better.

originally posted by: grey580
If the movie doesn't have Samuel L. Jackson in it I will be very disappointed.

Agreed. He could play Kirk or the wimpy French captain.

"Engage, mother fornicator!!!"

originally posted by: theatreboy
a reply to: projectvxn


Honestly, I expect to see Tarantino fall soon. He was very close with Weinstein....

why do you expect to see him fall?
cause he was friends with harvey?

a reply to: TinySickTears


I know I am wrong for guilty by association mentality, but I believe it is true in this case.

originally posted by: theatreboy
I know I am wrong for guilty by association mentality, but I believe it is true in this case.

It's not guilt by association, he admitted he knew what was going on and that is a bit of an understatement.

originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus

originally posted by: theatreboy
I know I am wrong for guilty by association mentality, but I believe it is true in this case.

It's not guilt by association, he admitted he knew what was going on and that is a bit of an understatement.

where did you hear that?
i want to read it.
seems like the general word is a lot of mofos knew what was going on.
same the the Coz