It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: EA006
originally posted by: dfnj2015
a reply to: toysforadults
The workers in this country are treated like dirt.
Correction: Goyim
originally posted by: Nyiah
originally posted by: rickymouse
Millions of people in this country do not have enough money to go two months without a paycheck. If there is a crash of the stock market and layoffs result again like in 08, we will have major problems again. We have allowed certain liberal economists to alter our economy into a very risky place. They talked conservatives into thinking it would work to have a consumer based economy, it has never worked on a large scale.
To be fair, Ricky...even your own more specialized job is disposable if there's no consumer-based economy raking it in to afford to hire you. Companies can pay you to build new digs, but it's pretty worthless to shell out for if it's just going to be a shuttered, expensive loss for them because no one can afford the product/service it would offer in the first place. That's a blatant snowball effect problem no one wants to admit to. Just ask Florida how well builders & associated contractors did around '08 (big hint-- pretty damn bad) It's not like a lawyer or a mason has guaranteed job security if they have no cash coming their way, now is it?
originally posted by: rickymouse
originally posted by: Nyiah
originally posted by: rickymouse
Millions of people in this country do not have enough money to go two months without a paycheck. If there is a crash of the stock market and layoffs result again like in 08, we will have major problems again. We have allowed certain liberal economists to alter our economy into a very risky place. They talked conservatives into thinking it would work to have a consumer based economy, it has never worked on a large scale.
To be fair, Ricky...even your own more specialized job is disposable if there's no consumer-based economy raking it in to afford to hire you. Companies can pay you to build new digs, but it's pretty worthless to shell out for if it's just going to be a shuttered, expensive loss for them because no one can afford the product/service it would offer in the first place. That's a blatant snowball effect problem no one wants to admit to. Just ask Florida how well builders & associated contractors did around '08 (big hint-- pretty damn bad) It's not like a lawyer or a mason has guaranteed job security if they have no cash coming their way, now is it?
We need both production jobs making the things we use and the consumer based jobs. I am a Builder, I provide a consumer based need. The houses I built are consumer based needs, the materials they are made of need to be made here to stabalize the economy here. The production of the nails, the plywoods and OSB boards and such are made in factories. Those are necessary materials. services are consumer based. We need to make more refrigerators and stoves and toasters and beaters and stuff here to stabalize the economy. Stuff we need in our everyday life. The vast majority of computers and phones are even made outside of this country. Although they are not necessities, they should still be made here.
originally posted by: Aliensun
originally posted by: rickymouse
Millions of people in this country do not have enough money to go two months without a paycheck. If there is a crash of the stock market and layoffs result again like in 08, we will have major problems again.
I quote the relevant part of your email. Through no fault of their own are the lowest members of our populations will be the ones to suffer and to suffer physically the most. Those higher up the chain will simply not buy that Volvo they were lusting after, and, or give up the vacation house.
That is the time you will get your civil war, if the poor don't start it, then the over-burdened middle-class will have its back broken and will seek relief, drastic, but lawful changes in government.
originally posted by: rickymouse
originally posted by: Aliensun
originally posted by: rickymouse
Millions of people in this country do not have enough money to go two months without a paycheck. If there is a crash of the stock market and layoffs result again like in 08, we will have major problems again.
I quote the relevant part of your email. Through no fault of their own are the lowest members of our populations will be the ones to suffer and to suffer physically the most. Those higher up the chain will simply not buy that Volvo they were lusting after, and, or give up the vacation house.
That is the time you will get your civil war, if the poor don't start it, then the over-burdened middle-class will have its back broken and will seek relief, drastic, but lawful changes in government.
The ones I know that are at highest risk is the middle class. They have huge mortgages and a newer unpaid car and truck sitting in their garages. They have credit card debt and their net worth is zilch. The poor or low middle class might owe some money on a car, but they work at places usually like grocery stores and gas stations. They usually rent or live in a house they inherited, usually not a great house, but there is no mortgage when they get it.
The ones that will crumble are the upper middle class and middle middle class. They seem to have been allowed to get further in debt.
originally posted by: Edumakated
originally posted by: rickymouse
originally posted by: Nyiah
originally posted by: rickymouse
Millions of people in this country do not have enough money to go two months without a paycheck. If there is a crash of the stock market and layoffs result again like in 08, we will have major problems again. We have allowed certain liberal economists to alter our economy into a very risky place. They talked conservatives into thinking it would work to have a consumer based economy, it has never worked on a large scale.
To be fair, Ricky...even your own more specialized job is disposable if there's no consumer-based economy raking it in to afford to hire you. Companies can pay you to build new digs, but it's pretty worthless to shell out for if it's just going to be a shuttered, expensive loss for them because no one can afford the product/service it would offer in the first place. That's a blatant snowball effect problem no one wants to admit to. Just ask Florida how well builders & associated contractors did around '08 (big hint-- pretty damn bad) It's not like a lawyer or a mason has guaranteed job security if they have no cash coming their way, now is it?
We need both production jobs making the things we use and the consumer based jobs. I am a Builder, I provide a consumer based need. The houses I built are consumer based needs, the materials they are made of need to be made here to stabalize the economy here. The production of the nails, the plywoods and OSB boards and such are made in factories. Those are necessary materials. services are consumer based. We need to make more refrigerators and stoves and toasters and beaters and stuff here to stabalize the economy. Stuff we need in our everyday life. The vast majority of computers and phones are even made outside of this country. Although they are not necessities, they should still be made here.
The problem is that globalism has opened up a labor pool that works exponentially cheaper than anyone in the US. A US worker cannot compete against someone in a third world armpit making $2.50 PER DAY.
I highly doubt you want to be paying say 50 cents a nail made in the US when you can use 1 cent nails made in China. Your competitors would use the Chinese nails and under cut your bids even if you did have some patriotic desire to use the more expensive US made nails.
Tariffs that equalize labor forces is the only way to fix things, but I fear it is too late. It would be too disruptive economically.
The US thrived after WWII because we were the ONLY economy for the most part. Most of the other countries manufacturing was destroyed or non-existent.
originally posted by: rickymouse
originally posted by: Aliensun
originally posted by: rickymouse
Millions of people in this country do not have enough money to go two months without a paycheck. If there is a crash of the stock market and layoffs result again like in 08, we will have major problems again.
I quote the relevant part of your email. Through no fault of their own are the lowest members of our populations will be the ones to suffer and to suffer physically the most. Those higher up the chain will simply not buy that Volvo they were lusting after, and, or give up the vacation house.
That is the time you will get your civil war, if the poor don't start it, then the over-burdened middle-class will have its back broken and will seek relief, drastic, but lawful changes in government.
The ones I know that are at highest risk is the middle class. They have huge mortgages and a newer unpaid car and truck sitting in their garages. They have credit card debt and their net worth is zilch. The poor or low middle class might owe some money on a car, but they work at places usually like grocery stores and gas stations. They usually rent or live in a house they inherited, usually not a great house, but there is no mortgage when they get it.
The ones that will crumble are the upper middle class and middle middle class. They seem to have been allowed to get further in debt.
originally posted by: dfnj2015
a reply to: toysforadults
The workers in this country are treated like dirt.
originally posted by: rickymouse
The vast majority of computers and phones are even made outside of this country. Although they are not necessities, they should still be made here.
originally posted by: Tempter
originally posted by: EA006
originally posted by: dfnj2015
a reply to: toysforadults
The workers in this country are treated like dirt.
Correction: Goyim
Take it back to /pol, will ya?
originally posted by: Saiker
a reply to: EA006
The wonderful thing about freedom is you do have a choice. If they don't pay enough don't take the job. Want government to force them to pay better expect companies to only hire who they can afford.
1000 employees at 20$ an hour or 750 at 30$ an hour. That's saying if the 750 were able to output the same as 1000 workers.
originally posted by: rickymouse
originally posted by: Edumakated
originally posted by: rickymouse
originally posted by: Nyiah
originally posted by: rickymouse
Millions of people in this country do not have enough money to go two months without a paycheck. If there is a crash of the stock market and layoffs result again like in 08, we will have major problems again. We have allowed certain liberal economists to alter our economy into a very risky place. They talked conservatives into thinking it would work to have a consumer based economy, it has never worked on a large scale.
To be fair, Ricky...even your own more specialized job is disposable if there's no consumer-based economy raking it in to afford to hire you. Companies can pay you to build new digs, but it's pretty worthless to shell out for if it's just going to be a shuttered, expensive loss for them because no one can afford the product/service it would offer in the first place. That's a blatant snowball effect problem no one wants to admit to. Just ask Florida how well builders & associated contractors did around '08 (big hint-- pretty damn bad) It's not like a lawyer or a mason has guaranteed job security if they have no cash coming their way, now is it?
We need both production jobs making the things we use and the consumer based jobs. I am a Builder, I provide a consumer based need. The houses I built are consumer based needs, the materials they are made of need to be made here to stabalize the economy here. The production of the nails, the plywoods and OSB boards and such are made in factories. Those are necessary materials. services are consumer based. We need to make more refrigerators and stoves and toasters and beaters and stuff here to stabalize the economy. Stuff we need in our everyday life. The vast majority of computers and phones are even made outside of this country. Although they are not necessities, they should still be made here.
The problem is that globalism has opened up a labor pool that works exponentially cheaper than anyone in the US. A US worker cannot compete against someone in a third world armpit making $2.50 PER DAY.
I highly doubt you want to be paying say 50 cents a nail made in the US when you can use 1 cent nails made in China. Your competitors would use the Chinese nails and under cut your bids even if you did have some patriotic desire to use the more expensive US made nails.
Tariffs that equalize labor forces is the only way to fix things, but I fear it is too late. It would be too disruptive economically.
The US thrived after WWII because we were the ONLY economy for the most part. Most of the other countries manufacturing was destroyed or non-existent.
Right now, probably eighty percent of the money in our country is in the hands of the top ten percent. They make their money in importing. Look at LA and New York, their local economies are bolstered by handling and selling imports. The rich get the contracts and boost the price up and get rich, they do not even hide this. They make money on speculation of gas and oil too, lots of money, we pay the price. Oil companies do not rape us, the people shuffling money in trading make way more than the oil companies. But the oil company execs also invest in the speculation. Not really speculation, nobody loses money if they are a member of their elite club.
We could easily make more of the stuff here and support our own people. People working in factories do buy things, they make a decent wage. Back in the seventies and early eighties, there were lots of living wage jobs, not that many people needed assistance. Looky now, you can go bankrupt from an illness easily, not like when doctor visits were thirty five bucks for a half hour visit where the doctor explained what you could do to avoid having to take pills. If you were lucky to find a doctor who actually tried to help you.
We do produce some stuff, but we should be producing at least half of what Americans use, that would force companies to move back here and make stuff. If we do not buy their products, they make no money.
As far as Chinese stuff being cheaper, I was going to start importing tools and talked to the person from Taiwan who was head of the American sales. They make tools for many companies. I know what they are paying for these tools, the big companies double or triple their money on these things, then the stores mark them up thirty percent..
We could compete if they put a ten percent tax on imports, right now the importers are getting very rich. The money handlers always make the money in our society now.
Well someone had to mention unions, the ones that corporate directors and shareholders used as the original reason to offshore manufacturing due silly-ass workrules, wanton strikes and lackadaisical work ethics - yup those unions I remember very well from sixties and seventies. Those unions were certainly not all of the problem but they played their part in the problem.