It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Slanter
a reply to: neo96
except for those silly things like ending slavery, equal rights, women's rights... etc.
originally posted by: fiverx313
i think you need to draw a distinction between elected democrats and the liberals down here on the ground. i think most of us real-life liberals are happy to throw them all on the fire, left and right, when this kind of news comes out. i've seen far more of us saying that they need to apologize and step down than i see of real-life conservatives saying the same about trump or moore.
just my two cents.
originally posted by: neo96
Liberals on the wrong side of history
They've never been on the right side of history.
EVER.
originally posted by: Slanter
a reply to: neo96
Abraham Lincoln was a liberal president. Just because he was a republican doesn't mean he wasn't liberal.
Women's sufferage and giving African Americans the right to vote were both the result of liberal ideals. You think those were bad things?
originally posted by: neo96
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
originally posted by: dfnj2015
originally posted by: neo96
Liberals on the wrong side of history
They've never been on the right side of history.
EVER.
Child labor laws? Environmental Protection? Food and drug safety?
That and founding the country itself.
Really the PILGRIMS were liberals ?
Last time I checked they can't even admit GOD even exists, and are always running around screaming separation of church and state while dictating to the church.
jesus.....the people that wrote the constitution were RADICAL LIBERALS of their time....read a history book and understand the contextual nature of the politics associated with, and the countries involved in, the birth of the American nation.
originally posted by: LesMisanthrope
a reply to: jimmyx
jesus.....the people that wrote the constitution were RADICAL LIBERALS of their time....read a history book and understand the contextual nature of the politics associated with, and the countries involved in, the birth of the American nation.
The "liberals" today are nothing like the liberals of that time, unfortunately.
You didn't start or finish that statement with "My opinion is..."
Nor did you back it up with facts to support your statement.
Liberalism in the United States is a broad political philosophy centered on the unalienable rights of the individual. The fundamental liberal ideals of freedom of speech, freedom of the press, freedom of religion for all belief systems, and the separation of church and state, right to due process, and equality under the law are widely accepted as a common foundation across the spectrum of liberal thought.
Modern liberalism in the United States includes issues such as same-sex marriage, reproductive and other women's rights, voting rights for all adult citizens, civil rights, environmentalism, and government protection of freedom from want.[1] National social services such as: equal education opportunities; access to health care; and transportation infrastructure are intended to meet the responsibility to "promote the general welfare" of all citizens. Some American liberals, who call themselves classical liberals, fiscal conservatives, or libertarians, support fundamental liberal ideals but disagree with modern liberal thought, holding that economic freedom is more important than equality, and that providing for the general welfare exceeds the legitimate role of government.[2]
Since the 1930s, without a qualifier the term "liberalism" in the United States usually refers to "modern liberalism", a political philosophy exemplified by Franklin Delano Roosevelt's New Deal and, later, Lyndon Johnson's Great Society. It is a form of social liberalism, whose accomplishments include the Works Progress Administration and the Social Security Act in 1935, the Civil Rights Act of 1964, and the Voting Rights Act of 1965.
originally posted by: LesMisanthrope
a reply to: the owlbear
You didn't start or finish that statement with "My opinion is..."
Nor did you back it up with facts to support your statement.
Sorry, I assumed it was already a known fact among the educated.
Liberalism in the United States is a broad political philosophy centered on the unalienable rights of the individual. The fundamental liberal ideals of freedom of speech, freedom of the press, freedom of religion for all belief systems, and the separation of church and state, right to due process, and equality under the law are widely accepted as a common foundation across the spectrum of liberal thought.
Modern liberalism in the United States includes issues such as same-sex marriage, reproductive and other women's rights, voting rights for all adult citizens, civil rights, environmentalism, and government protection of freedom from want.[1] National social services such as: equal education opportunities; access to health care; and transportation infrastructure are intended to meet the responsibility to "promote the general welfare" of all citizens. Some American liberals, who call themselves classical liberals, fiscal conservatives, or libertarians, support fundamental liberal ideals but disagree with modern liberal thought, holding that economic freedom is more important than equality, and that providing for the general welfare exceeds the legitimate role of government.[2]
Since the 1930s, without a qualifier the term "liberalism" in the United States usually refers to "modern liberalism", a political philosophy exemplified by Franklin Delano Roosevelt's New Deal and, later, Lyndon Johnson's Great Society. It is a form of social liberalism, whose accomplishments include the Works Progress Administration and the Social Security Act in 1935, the Civil Rights Act of 1964, and the Voting Rights Act of 1965.
Wikipedia - Liberalism
Wikipedia - Liberalism in the United States
Sorry my Wikipedia skills are not up to par with yours.
You win. Is that what you want to hear?
originally posted by: LesMisanthrope
a reply to: the owlbear
Sorry my Wikipedia skills are not up to par with yours.
You win. Is that what you want to hear?
Neither is your knowledge of simple history. You could easily go remedy that.
You could also easily remedy using the term "liberal" as an insult but I don't see that happening.
And my knowledge of history is vast. I am an historian by education and view things from all angles. Not just LIBRBRUL. ARGGG...
I keep an open mind. Every viewpoint.
originally posted by: LesMisanthrope
a reply to: the owlbear
You could also easily remedy using the term "liberal" as an insult but I don't see that happening.
And my knowledge of history is vast. I am an historian by education and view things from all angles. Not just LIBRBRUL. ARGGG...
I keep an open mind. Every viewpoint.
Tell me about it. The use of the term "liberal" as an insult is just as idiotic as using the term "liberal" to describe a progressive. Both are insulting in my opinion.