Kate Steinle killer found not guilty of murder

Unbelievable.

I can't say I agree, but this is our justice system.

Will try to find a link

www.cnn.com...

a reply to: DBCowboy

Yeah, this was pretty damn disgusting.

Obviously he was the victim of something.

Well, on the up-side this should help shore up Trump's victory in 2020.

a reply to: DBCowboy

probably a bunch of libs on the jury

originally posted by: BestinShow
Well, on the up-side this should help shore up Trump's victory in 2020.

I don’t think Kate’s family gives two #s how this helps someone politically when justice has slipped through her fingers like so much sand.

a reply to: Arnie123

This is breaking news so I'm still trying to figure it out.


They couldn't even prove criminal negligence.

I guess you can be an illegal, kill a woman and say, "Ooops, my bad".

'Merka.

a reply to: DBCowboy

...... and when people start taking the law into their own hands, the men is suits will stand around scratching their heads wondering why

a reply to: DBCowboy

She wouldn't have died if the guy wasn't here illegally, accident or not.

Apparently the gun he held, he didn't know it was a gun so not even Involuntary Manslaughter.

Apparently the gun he held, he didn't know it was a gun so not even Involuntary Manslaughter.

Yeah, this case just goes to show we have no real justice system anymore. Now its all about who you know, or what party, or group,or corporation loves you enough to bail you out. Completely disgusting .

a reply to: DBCowboy

What?!

California.
👎

That is all I can say without violating the t&c.

Sad, really. This illegal had been deported five times! Much of his life was spent behind bars for one thing or another.

In returning its verdict on the sixth day of deliberations, the San Francisco Superior Court jury found Jose Ines Garcia Zarate guilty of a single lesser charge of being a felon in possession of a gun. He will be sentenced at a later date.

They could have charged him with first degree murder, second degree murder, or involuntary manslaughter.

a reply to: DBCowboy

We can only hope that the trial hasn't been too stressful an ordeal for this poor unfortunate man.

originally posted by: DBCowboy
Apparently the gun he held, he didn't know it was a gun so not even Involuntary Manslaughter.

I thought his original excuse was that he did not mean to kill her, that he was trying to shoot a sea lion.

originally posted by: butcherguy

originally posted by: DBCowboy
Apparently the gun he held, he didn't know it was a gun so not even Involuntary Manslaughter.

I thought his original excuse was that he did not mean to kill her, that he was trying to shoot a sea lion.

If that's true, then he knew he was holding a weapon.