It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: dan121212
www.youtube.com...
I don’t see the Sahara getting bigger every year, so what do you all think?
originally posted by: ANNED
we are at the high of the Milankovitch Cycle.
all other Milankovitch Cycles have dropped to there low point and CO2 has nothing to do with it.
originally posted by: JoshuaCox
a reply to: Phage
Even if we are,( I’m assuming the malcovich cycle is the normal temp swings over the eons) the CO2 would be on top of that...
Imho and I assume the reason they have such overwhelming support from scientists, is that it is easy math..
CO2 holds more heat..
We are producing a butt ton of CO2...
Obviously the planet will heat up..
How fast and what the results will be are fairly debated.
But pretending VERY basic math is a conspiracy...
Well that was just bad propaganda..
They would have done better atacking the potential consequences, rather than the math surrounding CO2 heat absorption..
originally posted by: JoshuaCox
a reply to: peter vlar
Absolutely.. so how is saying “methane” a rebuttal?!?!
Lol..I know it wasn’t you..
But it just blows my mind..
I often wonder how people honestly searching for answers precieve these debates on ATS..
Do they look at a reply like that and think “nailed it!”
Or do they look at it and say, “wait a min.. that’s not a counterpoint!”
originally posted by: ANNED
we are at the high of the Milankovitch Cycle.
all other Milankovitch Cycles have dropped to there low point and CO2 has nothing to do with it.