A Treasure Trove of Documents Tying Russia to Uranium One

Someone will have to explain why a reporter has acquired documents that prove Jeff Sessions is either stupid, forgetful, or complicit in the Uranium One ordeal. I can't wait until this whole US/Russia thing explodes and the paradigm shift occurs.

Recent pushback in Congressional testimony by Department of Justice Attorney General Jeff Sessions, as well as unnamed Justice Department officials in several news articles, stating that the case involving a highly placed FBI confidential informant in the Russian nuclear industry was not connected to the sale of the Canadian firm Uranium One in 2010, does not coincide with the trove of documents, emails and memoranda obtained by this reporter that prove otherwise.

Link

Who is this consultant?

Moreover, an American energy consultant, who is now an official with the Department of Energy’s office of Nuclear Energy, produced a memorandum regarding the acquisition of Uranium One and other legislative matters for one of the main Russian co-conspirators that was then under an FBI clandestine investigation.

Within the over 5,000 documents and briefs, were detailed plans of Russia’s state controlled nuclear arm Rosatom, and its subsidiaries, to penetrate America’s vast energy market and its efforts to gain approval of the United States government for the eventual purchase of Uranium One. At the time, Uranium One controlled roughly 20 percent of American uranium mining capacity.

In fact, the evidence obtained by the Department of Justice and FBI, starting as early as 2008 paint a much different picture than that of recent reports regarding the confidential informant, William D. Campbell Jr., and his role. According to the documents, Campbell gained insight into Russia’s strategic plans to gain global dominance in the uranium industry and to build a closer relationship with Obama administration officials.

Even with the evidence they had, the FBI still allowed Obama to approve the sale. Was Mueller and Rosenstein part of the deal?

By July, 2009, Campbell had garnered the Russian’s trust and signed a contract with “Tenex/Rosatom,” according to his contract. It was after signing the contract and discovering the corruption inside the Russian companies that he went voluntarily to the bureau to inform them of what he believed was money laundering and bribery schemes.

The Department of Justice asked him to continue working with the Russians, and in return he provided the FBI with insurmountable evidence of corruption, kickbacks and money laundering during his four years undercover.

By the time the sale of Uranium One was approved by the Obama Administration, the FBI’s investigators had already gathered substantial evidence and the bureau was also aware of Russia’s intentions to enter the U.S. energy market and its desire to purchase a stake in American uranium, the documents show.

With substantial evidence of corruption leading up to the sale, why wouldn't Mueller take action? What exactly was the FBI after?

At the time, the FBI was headed by director Robert Mueller, who is now the Special Counsel investigating allegations of Trump Russia collusion. Also involved was current Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein, who then was  U.S. Attorney for Maryland, where the Russian’s nuclear arm’s American subsidiary Tenam was based. Tenam was a subsidiary of the Russian commercial company responsible for the sale and transportation of this uranium to the U.S. is the Kremlin-controlled company “Tenex” and Tenex is a subsidiary of the Russian state nuclear arm, Rosatom.

Tick Tock, dammit...

LETS SEE THOSE DOCUMENTS!!

PS - I make bad political threads

a reply to: eisegesis

TIC TOC for sure . Maybe Trump made a deal with Mueller ...Fix it and a pardon will happen .Don't and .....well are you feeling lucky punk ?

a reply to: eisegesis

Why did you highlight this?

By the time the sale of Uranium One was approved by the Obama Administration, the FBI’s investigators had already gathered substantial evidence and the bureau was also aware of Russia’s intentions to enter the U.S. energy market and its desire to purchase a stake in American uranium, the documents show.

I read the unnecessarily long article and correct me if I'm wrong here, but there's not one mention of anything illegal or even unethical. In fact, I'm looking really hard to find something here of any substance that would back up the overacting on Hannity by Carter and Solomon.

He has an email where Fisk forwarded a Reuter's article? Stop the presses!

Someone will have to explain why a reporter has acquired documents that prove Jeff Sessions is either stupid, forgetful, or complicit in the Uranium One ordeal. I can't wait until this whole US/Russia thing explodes and the paradigm shift occurs.

I won't argue about Sessions being stupid/forgetful but there's nothing here. If these are what was deemed worthy of publication from this supposed "treasure trove" then I'd really hate to see the rest. I mean, what is it? Borscht recipes?

a reply to: theantediluvian

The paragraph before that one puts it into context:

"The Department of Justice asked him to continue working with the Russians, and in return he provided the FBI with insurmountable evidence of corruption, kickbacks and money laundering during his four years undercover."

And if the FBI was aware of this back then, why was nothing done about it?

originally posted by: eisegesis

With substantial evidence of corruption leading up to the sale, why wouldn't Mueller take action? What exactly was the FBI after?

He was simply following his orders from the Administration.

originally posted by: eisegesis

Who is this consultant?

perhaps ......

FBI UNDERCOVER Informant On Hillary’s 2010 Sale Of Uranium Identified

a reply to: eisegesis

Aw hells yea!!

This is going to be a great week for truth!

Campbell clearly has some major corruption to expose and there is going to be so many heads exploding it is going to be priceless!

Tip of the ice berg!

Once the floodgates open on the Clinton Foundation, we shall see the eye of the storm!

Tick mother f****** tock!!

+++

a reply to: elementalgrove

+++
++
+
-
--
---

all comes to:

. . . _ _ _ . . .

(short for "Secretary of State")

a reply to: xuenchen

Watching her interviews and attempt to classify the DOJ investigating her as "an abuse of power" is quite hilarious.

Blood is in the water and her crimes are catching up to her, truth is her puppeteers have no way to protect her and she is realizing that she is not beyond sacrifice.

What is funny is that her trail will lead to so many others!

No wonder Soros and CO are scrambling for a plan!

a reply to: eisegesis

On hannity.com..

Is fox running this story too??

They are propaganda whores too, but at least they will quietly retract totally unsubstantiated stories..

So if Fox isn’t willing to post it, then you can bet dollars to donuts it’s fake..

a reply to: eisegesis

Your forgetting option 2....

The reason Jeff Sessions says there is no evidence against Clinton could be because there isn’t any, and all those pretending otherwise are the liars..

I don’t give a flip about Hilary clintons neo-con @$$, but that doesn’t mean everything her political opponents say is the truth..

a reply to: elementalgrove

Meanwhile back in the real world the snowball continues to grow as it rolls downhill collecting trumps people.

The Trump foundation is and had been under investigation. Trump is trying to shut it down as he believes if he desolves the foundation it will end the investigation.

He's being investigated from every angle and still ...Hillary...Lol
Yes this is going to be a good week.
Wrapped up with a great big bow. Maybe early Christmas.

a reply to: elementalgrove

Them thinking they can just order an investigation without any evidence is what is really funny.
Like Sessions warned them. It will take a factual basis and just because something looks like something is not a factual basis for a special counsel. That's paraphrased but that's the gist of it.

Anyway yeah things are really snowballing now.

a reply to: elementalgrove

Wanna bet?

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: elementalgrove

Wanna bet?

Oh absolutely Silly!

This could be fun, what would you like to wager?

How about the person who loses authors an entire thread about how they were wrong?

In this thread we shall go into great detail about how either Hilldog or Trumpster has been guilty the whole time.

We shall dive into each conspiracy of either individual and confirm that we had been duped and our confirmation bias's got in our way of seeing the truth.

We shall then analyze our own cognitive dissonance and discuss how much growth we have had due to our own self reflection.

I would love to make this bet!

How about you?

a reply to: eisegesis

Turns out the Clintons with Westinghouse Inc and Guistra made the deal and all the money at the same time making deals to cut Russia out of Ukraine and Khazakstan. Obama was just a stooge apparently.