It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
There was a law preventing import already so, what possible justification was there for getting rid of it?
Fair enough, if there was no law then there's a debate to be had about whether one is needed. Presumably that already took place and they determined there was a need for the law.
So...
Why the change? Is there suddenly no need for it? Are the reasons it was originally introduced no longer valid? What possible justification is there for this? Genuinely, I'm curious..
originally posted by: thesaneone
Changing the law to bring your hunt home is = to buying parts from a poacher?
Again, fake outrage.
originally posted by: jacquesdarippa
a reply to: Irishhaf
I am saying it would be best if we were not even part of that trade. Saying it is OK to be part of one illegal act because other countries do it, is not a great point.
originally posted by: jacquesdarippa
originally posted by: thesaneone
Changing the law to bring your hunt home is = to buying parts from a poacher?
Again, fake outrage.
You would be stupid to not realize that poaching will also increase due to a new demand this law change will make. Animal trophies can now be brought back and poachers will have a new demand from Americans who can now buy and bring them back.
originally posted by: Irishhaf
a reply to: Indrasweb
You know when everyone lost their minds over that dentist, a fellow going to school in the states wrote an opinion piece and he received death threats for saying growing up in Africa death by lion was a real concern for his village.. Sorry I will take the word of someone that lived there and saw the after effects of a lion attack.
originally posted by: jacquesdarippa
a reply to: thesaneone
It sure did cut the demand if it wasn't legal for Americans to bring back trophies.
originally posted by: Indrasweb
a reply to: thesaneone
Do you really believe that opening up an enormous market like the US for trade of rare animal products WON'T increase poaching?
The 2008 ivory sale also corresponded with a 70% rise in the seizures of illegal ivory. The surges in poaching and seizures occurred right across Africa and the researchers checked for other factors that might have been involved, such as an increase in Chinese workers in Africa or rising affluence in China or Japan.
originally posted by: thesaneone
Changing the law to bring your hunt home is = to buying parts from a poacher?
Again, fake outrage.
Hopefully they will take the money and hire more security to keep the poaching down, hunters should be able to keep their legal trophy If they choose to.