It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Zaphod58
a reply to: RadioRobert
Once life support and associated human requirements are yanked, they'll be able to add another tank and add fuel. It isn't the best solution in the world, but it meets the timeline. There is no way in hell that a clean sheet design is operational a year after being awarded.
originally posted by: JIMC5499
a reply to: Zaphod58
I still favor the S-3 COD conversion.
originally posted by: JIMC5499
a reply to: Zaphod58
I still favor the S-3 COD conversion.
originally posted by: mightmight
originally posted by: JIMC5499
a reply to: Zaphod58
I still favor the S-3 COD conversion.
Whats wrong with eventually using the V-22s? The Corps is already using the MV-22Bs as tanker aircraft, eventually they'll have an 10k lb offload capacity. No reason (besides the usual stupidity) for the Navy not to do the same with the upcoming CMV-22B...
originally posted by: RadioRobert
originally posted by: mightmight
originally posted by: JIMC5499
a reply to: Zaphod58
I still favor the S-3 COD conversion.
Whats wrong with eventually using the V-22s? The Corps is already using the MV-22Bs as tanker aircraft, eventually they'll have an 10k lb offload capacity. No reason (besides the usual stupidity) for the Navy not to do the same with the upcoming CMV-22B...
Because the V-22 is too slow for ideal receiving and transit times, but way more importantly it has the same problem as the SH. The 10000lb off load is for recovery tanking, not mission tanking. At range the offload drops off dramatically.
originally posted by: mightmight
I'm not sure about this, but doesnt VARS include additional cabin tanks?
originally posted by: Zaphod58
a reply to: RadioRobert
The F-18E, which these will almost certainly be built off has an internal fuel capacity of 14,400 pounds. Add CFTs, and they gain almost 19,000 pounds, without even touching the externals or adding another tank where the cockpit is. The externals are 480 gallons, adding another 13,000 pounds. That gives them about 46,000 pounds and should meet the 15,000 at 500 nm easily.
originally posted by: JIMC5499
originally posted by: mightmight
I'm not sure about this, but doesnt VARS include additional cabin tanks?
With the forces imposed by launch and recovery, cabin tanks may not be an option.
originally posted by: mightmight
I'm not sure about this, but doesnt VARS include additional cabin tanks?
warfaretech.blogspot.com...
Should give them an offload capability at range. Of course it wont be perfect but everything helps at this point.
And what was the S-3Bs offload capacity at range anyway?
originally posted by: Zaphod58
a reply to: RadioRobert
Except that you're losing everything associated with weapons and fire control, so you're losing radar weight as well as everything else related to fire control.
F-18E, which these will almost certainly be built off has an internal fuel capacity of 14,400 pounds. Add CFTs, and they gain almost 19,000 pounds, without even touching the externals or adding another tank where the cockpit is. The externals are 480 gallons, adding another 13,000 pounds. That gives them about 46,000 pounds and should meet the 15,000 at 500 nm easily.
originally posted by: Zaphod58
a reply to: mightmight
Even if my numbers are off, which they probably are since I'm not be super critical with sources today, that still gives them enough to offload at 500 nm. That would put them at 34,000 pounds or so, easily enough to offload 15,000.