Interesting take for those concerned with Tweets...Hillary and Bill

So neither Hillary nor Bill Clinton have made a peep about the Texas shooting nor Braziles accusations on Twitter.

Now the Brazile thing is understandable as she may not want to bring attention to it.

The shooting in Texas not being used as a anti gun platform for her is really odd. She typically never misses an opportunity to use something like this as a soapbox.

Wondering if there is something true to the rumors of her possibly being next up in the indictment line with the Podestas and she is either dealing with that or maybe she just really doesn't care about those killed?

Anywho....thought it odd she hasn't said anything when her normal reaction would have been to say something even if it was misinformed or out of touch.

a reply to: Vasa Croe


Maybe she has one of those giant green loogies caught in her throat and just cannot comment until she yorks it up.

a reply to: Vasa Croe

What is it with Hillary? Over the weekend the number of threads concerning Hillary would break a camels back!

Just let her fade into obscurity already.

Maybe since all the lefties cant quit harping about how Trump likes to post twitful tweets, she doesn't want to come off as a sort of vicarious hypocrite...

Nah, being a brazen first hand hypocrite isnt even beyond her norm.



a reply to: intrptr

If only the egomaniac attention whore herself could ever in all her days since being First Lady.

originally posted by: intrptr
a reply to: Vasa Croe

What is it with Hillary? Over the weekend the number of threads concerning Hillary would break a camels back!

Just let her fade into obscurity already.

Hmmm...no idea./sarcasm

originally posted by: intrptr
a reply to: Vasa Croe

What is it with Hillary? Over the weekend the number of threads concerning Hillary would break a camels back!

Just let her fade into obscurity already.

No, she needs to fade into accountability.

a reply to: intrptr

Just let her fade into obscurity already.

I'd rather she did that behind bars.

originally posted by: IgnoranceIsntBlisss
Maybe since all the lefties cant quit harping about how Trump likes to post twitful tweets, she doesn't want to come off as a sort of vicarious hypocrite...

Nah, being a brazen first hand hypocrite isnt even beyond her norm.

a reply to: intrptr

If only the egomaniac attention whore herself could ever in all her days since being First Lady.

She tweeted 3 times the minute the Vegas story broke....all about guns and ignorance about "silencers"....guess she's not that concerned unless the body count is close to hers....

Has anyone checked the Scooby van?

Yes, her silence is odd. She hasn't tweeted since Nov 2nd.

originally posted by: butcherguy
a reply to: intrptr

Just let her fade into obscurity already.

I'd rather she did that behind bars.

Good luck. If the Bushes, Cheneys, Rumsfelds, etc., got away with it, so shall she.

The only thing that will stop the madness will be another Nuremberg. In order for that to happen...

originally posted by: loam
Has anyone checked the Scooby van?

Yes, her silence is odd.

Hearing Tony Podesta arrest/indictment will be public on the 6th.

a reply to: Vasa Croe

they are citizens just like you, did you tweet about the incident?

if she did, the thread would ve been "Hillary wont go away"

i swear i don't know if some of you would know what to do with yourselves if hillary really went away. you're obsessed with her.

a reply to: fiverx313

I freely admit to being obsessed with her....as far as the notion of her seeing the inside of a prison cell goes, anyway.

Her use of Twitter or whatever she's doing to hawk her novel-dressed-up-as-an-autobiography? Couldn't care less about. Not sure why some folks get so bent outta shape when she opens her mouth to say something stupid, as she's been doing that for decades now.

a reply to: Vasa Croe

BWAHAHAHA

No there is is no truth to it..

That podesta works for trump and is one of his top advisers, AND appearently he is cutting a deal with the FBI to testify..

Not on hillary lol..

He is almost certainly testifying on trump, or atleast his campaign..

The cult of trump types are pretending this podesta is connected to Hillary because of the name recognition concerning JOHN Podesta..

It’s just par for the course conservative conspiracy theory nonesense.

a reply to: fiverx313

Well the GOP holds all 3 branches..

All they can do is try and use 8 track flashbacks to defect from their own issues..

The hilarious part is the podesta indicted is Trumps advisor.. not Hillary’s

Lmao

originally posted by: intrptr
a reply to: Vasa Croe



Just let her fade into obscurity already.

That's like a doctor saying to his patient: "I recommend we just ignore that malignant tumor."

a reply to: TinfoilTP

That is hilarious considering that the Podesta indicted is one of TRUMPS top advisors and is appearently willing to testify against Trump!

AND trump runs every branch of law enforcement and no one is willing to file charges...

My bet is there is no evidence against her and a legal move like that could be a felony if a judge decides it’s a blantant witch hunt to deflect from the actual charges surrounding trump.

So just keep on waiting for her be indicted lol..

a reply to: JoshuaCox

originally posted by: IAMTAT
...that malignant tumor.

I believe the correct medical term is a Wasserman-Schultz.