It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: thepixelpusher
a reply to: tadaman
When Star Trek Discovery shoved the transgender argument by having the female character called Michael, I knew it was over. The original Star Trek had hidden lessons but didn't get that screwed up.
originally posted by: thepixelpusher
a reply to: tadaman
When Star Trek Discovery shoved the transgender argument by having the female character called Michael, I knew it was over. The original Star Trek had hidden lessons but didn't get that screwed up.
originally posted by: intrepid
originally posted by: thepixelpusher
a reply to: tadaman
When Star Trek Discovery shoved the transgender argument by having the female character called Michael, I knew it was over. The original Star Trek had hidden lessons but didn't get that screwed up.
I wouldn't say that. For its time this:
...was WAY out there.
originally posted by: thepixelpusher
a reply to: nonspecific
Pretty slow on the uptake then. plenty have been debating this.
'Star Trek: Discovery' lead gets surprising character name
originally posted by: WakeUpBeer
a reply to: thepixelpusher
What people are debating is irrelevant, to me at least.
I care more about liking or disliking the character.
And while I do feel her name has some 'agenda' behind it, I don't feel anything is being shoved down my throat, let alone identity politics.
ETA:
Are you suggesting trans etc. + whatever, have no place in Star Trek?