It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Gothmog
originally posted by: Dudemo5
originally posted by: xuenchen
Good strategy to release it.
Now people can rip it apart easier.
You've defined your entire posting philosophy.
Yep , if it requires ripping apart , that one can surely perform the task
They have my admiration
originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: burdman30ott6
So, to what do you attribute the current warming trend?
How soon can we expect it to level off, naturally?
If it doesn't level off, or slow down, do you think the costs of the effects will be negligible?
The sun, manipulated "data," larger cities closer to temp stations acting like giant concrete heat sinks, all working with a tiny pinprick worth of observed, recorded data.
Do you think that makes you sound funny? Or was it just a really bad attempt at a straw man argument?
Well, if it doesn't level off, the biggest cost will be replacing structures and clothes that spontaneously burst into flames due to 300 degree air temps.
Funny thing dude, you know that the North Pole is under an ocean, and always has been. Right? Hard to have a rain forest underwater, don't you think? But people and cities weren't around 55 million years ago, so who really cares what the climate was like then? So, what's the cause of the current warming "cycle" (which is probably fake because the data)? Orbital factors? Solar output? Can't be CO2, right? Because... why?
Funny thing dude, Earth has been massively hotter than it is now, to the point where the current poles were lush tropical rain forests (a fact proven by fossils rather than inferred via manipulated computer models), and yet here we are cooler today... cycles, their a recurring theme in nature.
originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: burdman30ott6
The sun, manipulated "data," larger cities closer to temp stations acting like giant concrete heat sinks, all working with a tiny pinprick worth of observed, recorded data.
So, how has the Sun changed over the past 50 years or so? I don't suppose you've perused the data?
Oh, I see you don't believe that the planet is warming. The data is fake.
Never mind.
Do you think that makes you sound funny? Or was it just a really bad attempt at a straw man argument?
Well, if it doesn't level off, the biggest cost will be replacing structures and clothes that spontaneously burst into flames due to 300 degree air temps.
Funny thing dude, you know that the North Pole is under an ocean, and always has been. Right? Hard to have a rain forest underwater, don't you think? But people and cities weren't around 55 million years ago, so who really cares what the climate was like then? So, what's the cause of the current warming "cycle" (which is probably fake because the data)? Orbital factors? Solar output? Can't be CO2, right? Because... why?
Funny thing dude, Earth has been massively hotter than it is now, to the point where the current poles were lush tropical rain forests (a fact proven by fossils rather than inferred via manipulated computer models), and yet here we are cooler today... cycles, their a recurring theme in nature.
larger cities closer to temp stations acting like giant concrete heat sinks
originally posted by: BeefNoMeat
a reply to: network dude
It was 87 in Raleigh today and I could ride my bike to Dunn where you are. Yeah, it was cold for a few days a couple weeks back, but this isn’t the ‘normal’ climate in fall in NC — it was 90 or more for several days at the beginning of the State Fair. When will it feel like fall in NC?