It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: TinfoilTP
originally posted by: introvert
a reply to: carewemust
It's a stretch to imagine that Trump campaign workers helped Russia hack into voting systems, and give the election to Donald Trump.
That is a straw man argument.
Very few, if any, are suggesting people on Trump's team helped Russia hack voting systems.
But it is quite possible they may have done some other things that they should not have done.
By the way, witch hunts usually do not end in real indictments.
As we have learned, they found enough to indict two individuals and get a guilty plea out of another.
No indictment of Trump = witch hunt.
originally posted by: TinfoilTP
originally posted by: introvert
a reply to: carewemust
It's a stretch to imagine that Trump campaign workers helped Russia hack into voting systems, and give the election to Donald Trump.
That is a straw man argument.
Very few, if any, are suggesting people on Trump's team helped Russia hack voting systems.
But it is quite possible they may have done some other things that they should not have done.
By the way, witch hunts usually do not end in real indictments.
As we have learned, they found enough to indict two individuals and get a guilty plea out of another.
No indictment of Trump = witch hunt.
originally posted by: Dudemo5
originally posted by: TinfoilTP
originally posted by: introvert
a reply to: carewemust
It's a stretch to imagine that Trump campaign workers helped Russia hack into voting systems, and give the election to Donald Trump.
That is a straw man argument.
Very few, if any, are suggesting people on Trump's team helped Russia hack voting systems.
But it is quite possible they may have done some other things that they should not have done.
By the way, witch hunts usually do not end in real indictments.
As we have learned, they found enough to indict two individuals and get a guilty plea out of another.
No indictment of Trump = witch hunt.
The purpose of the investigation is not to "indict Trump."
originally posted by: burntheships
a reply to: Pyle
You might want to catch up.
Manafort charges are related to years way prior to Trump.
Like 5 years, what took so long????
originally posted by: burntheships
a reply to: 3NL1GHT3N3D1
how about addressing the topic?
Is Mueller compromised?
originally posted by: TinfoilTP
originally posted by: Dudemo5
originally posted by: TinfoilTP
originally posted by: introvert
a reply to: carewemust
It's a stretch to imagine that Trump campaign workers helped Russia hack into voting systems, and give the election to Donald Trump.
That is a straw man argument.
Very few, if any, are suggesting people on Trump's team helped Russia hack voting systems.
But it is quite possible they may have done some other things that they should not have done.
By the way, witch hunts usually do not end in real indictments.
As we have learned, they found enough to indict two individuals and get a guilty plea out of another.
No indictment of Trump = witch hunt.
The purpose of the investigation is not to "indict Trump."
Lol, tell that to the Liberal Media.
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
originally posted by: burntheships
a reply to: Krazysh0t
Yes he was involved! See the link Xue posted on page one!
He was The Director of The FBI during the Uranium One
Investigation, which most of it was hidden from Congess.
Well Congress is pissed!
The FBI wasn't one of the 10 agencies that brokered the Uranium One deal. Why is that so hard for you to understand?
originally posted by: DanteGaland
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
originally posted by: burntheships
a reply to: Krazysh0t
Yes he was involved! See the link Xue posted on page one!
He was The Director of The FBI during the Uranium One
Investigation, which most of it was hidden from Congess.
Well Congress is pissed!
The FBI wasn't one of the 10 agencies that brokered the Uranium One deal. Why is that so hard for you to understand?
And it wasnt even WEAPONS-GRADE uranium.
Russia has LOADS of it anyway. And the uranium never left the country.
This is "Republican stupid" fake news level BS.
LMFAO.
Shocking stories exposing the rampant corruption within the Federal Bureau of Investigation have emerged week after week, but few have permeated into the highest level of public discussion. With the recent revelation that the FBI uncovered bribery, kickbacks, extortion and money laundering related to the Obama Administration's Russian Uranium deal - the hypocrisy of the leftist "Russian Narrative" has been further exposed.
originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: TinfoilTP
Three people from his team already indicted, one convicted and you think that's winning?
originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: MotherMayEye
Sure let him do that. Then congress will impeach him.
originally posted by: burgerbuddy
Here is a little history of FBI corruption.
Shocking stories exposing the rampant corruption within the Federal Bureau of Investigation have emerged week after week, but few have permeated into the highest level of public discussion. With the recent revelation that the FBI uncovered bribery, kickbacks, extortion and money laundering related to the Obama Administration's Russian Uranium deal - the hypocrisy of the leftist "Russian Narrative" has been further exposed.
25 mins