It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
I started watching that video and the ignorance of Wal Thornhill is always amazing to me. He cites problems with E=mc^2 and he doesn't seem to realize that isn't even the correct formula. Of course a photon has no mass so how does that formula tell you anything about the energy of a photon? That formula doesn't but the correct formula would as people who passed my quiz understand, but Wal Thornhill fails miserably.
originally posted by: booyakasha
a reply to: Arbitrageur
Just gonna leave this here. www.youtube.com...
I don't believe these scientists understand what they have seen. Black holes and gravitational waves do no exists in an electric universe. Send them back to the drawing board.
originally posted by: booyakasha
a reply to: Arbitrageur
Just gonna leave this here. www.youtube.com...
I don't believe these scientists understand what they have seen. Black holes and gravitational waves do no exists in an electric universe. Send them back to the drawing board.
That was one of the conspiracy theories, that the data was made up. The problem is a single person at one facility couldn't do it, it would take multiple people doing it at multiple facilities, at least two people at two facilities for the black hole observation.
originally posted by: chr0naut
a reply to: Arbitrageur
How do you know they aren't making it all up?
originally posted by: chr0naut
To try and explain the universe with just one force does not work, even slightly.
originally posted by: Arbitrageur
The subsequent observation involving neutron stars included not only the LIGO detectors but many other telescopes and observatories so the chances of such a large conspiratorial collaboration succeeding without being detected goes down as more and more facilities are involved, especially when any scientist involved could boost his own career by proving the data was wrong or faked.
When Berger got the calls, emails, and the automated official LIGO alert with the probable coordinates of what appeared to be a neutron-star merger, he knew that he and his team had to act quickly to see its aftermath using optical telescopes.
The timing was fortuitous. Virgo, a new gravitational-wave observatory similar to LIGO’s two detectors, had just come online in Europe. The three gravitational-wave detectors together were able to triangulate the signal.
originally posted by: Arbitrageur
The subsequent observation involving neutron stars included not only the LIGO detectors but many other telescopes and observatories so the chances of such a large conspiratorial collaboration succeeding without being detected goes down as more and more facilities are involved, especially when any scientist involved could boost his own career by proving the data was wrong or faked.
originally posted by: Arbitrageur
That was one of the conspiracy theories, that the data was made up. The problem is a single person at one facility couldn't do it, it would take multiple people doing it at multiple facilities, at least two people at two facilities for the black hole observation.
originally posted by: chr0naut
a reply to: Arbitrageur
How do you know they aren't making it all up?
The subsequent observation involving neutron stars included not only the LIGO detectors but many other telescopes and observatories so the chances of such a large conspiratorial collaboration succeeding without being detected goes down as more and more facilities are involved, especially when any scientist involved could boost his own career by proving the data was wrong or faked.
I did bring up the neutron star merger in my reply to Chronaut as a second event that would be even harder to fake (probably impossible given all the facilities involved) than the first event (black hole merger), but just to be clear, the man in the OP video (Dr. Adhikari) was not talking about the neutron star event. He was only referring to the first black hole event with far fewer facilities involved, and since your reply seems to infer that he should have known there was no way to fake the second event (neutron star merger), I just wanted to clarify he wasn't talking about that.
originally posted by: TEOTWAWKIAIFF
Skeptical is one thing but the guy from OP is paranoid.
So we all just stared at each other for a while and said "Did you do it?" "Did you do it?"...
originally posted by: RadioRobert
So we all just stared at each other for a while and said "Did you do it?" "Did you do it?"...
Sounds both rigorous and scientific.
(I'm not disputing gravitational waves; I just thought this was funny. It couldn't be fraud-- we asked each other if we were frauds, and everyone said, "nope")
originally posted by: chr0naut
But, on the other hand, LIGO had been running for 15 years with no results.
The threat of de-funding could push an unscrupulous researcher to falsify data and others to not look into things in too much depth, lest their position (and income) also go.
originally posted by: Soylent Green Is People
originally posted by: Arbitrageur
The subsequent observation involving neutron stars included not only the LIGO detectors but many other telescopes and observatories so the chances of such a large conspiratorial collaboration succeeding without being detected goes down as more and more facilities are involved, especially when any scientist involved could boost his own career by proving the data was wrong or faked.
Yes. This was a prime example of "Multi-messenger astronomy".
A few moments after LIGO detected the gravitational waves of the merging neutron stars, the Fermi Gamma-Ray Telescope detected a high energy EM burst from the exact same location of space. That coincidental observation of one event from multiple sources (and using multiple methods of detection) is a good confirmation that the event happened.
Multi-messenger astronomy is one of the new buzz-phrases in astronomy. The idea is that through coordinated efforts between multiple detectors that together can receive multiple messenger-carriers (electromagnetic radiation, gravitational waves, neutrinos, and cosmic rays) of an event or object, much more can be learned about that event or object by correlating the coincidental data from each messenger.
...It would be as if in the old proverb about the four blind men each describing a part of one elephant, the four blind men all got together and compered each others observations in a carefully coordinated manner, they would have eventually got an entire description of the elephant.