Prince William warns that there are too many people in the world

a reply to: EternalShadow
Overpopulation is a little more complicated than the amount of space. It’s about resource usage. If everyone on the planet was to live the same as people in the USA, we would need five Earths to produce the resources.

a reply to: EasyPleaseMe

He is probably right. We are producing frankenfoods to feed the majority of the people on the planet as is, tearing down trees and over fishing the seas to accommodate our sushi and salmon fetishes etc etc.. pretty soon we will be eating "fake food" we produce so much pollution and litter as is, what will happen when the population continues to increase?

a reply to: conspiracy nut





Fake food you say, I'm certain there is already a huge amount of fake foods already for sale, supermarkets stocked with stuff produced in a factory, pumped full of flavouring, preservatives and god knows what else.....

a reply to: hopenotfeariswhatweneed

I'm talking about fake laboratory produced meat. Human beings are growing like a cancer on the planet. We destroy everything in our path with little to no regard to future generations.

a reply to: conspiracy nut

Yep, I have little doubt it is already being consumed on a fairly broad spectrum, we just don't know it. The fake meat, or lab grown stuff has been around for quite some time now and we are good little Guinea pigs.

There is an agenda to reduce population.
Anyone heard of the Georgia Guide Stones?
Look up Agenda 21.


Don't be fooled into thinking that it is just Prince William or a British thing.
It doesn't matter who appears to be in power - the agenda is world wide.

And those who say there is plenty of room and that you should go and live in nature - people who live in nature in India are being moved - the authorities say it is to protect the tigers and other wild life. The agenda is to move everyone eventually to controlled areas.
Giving money to charities that say they want to protect the wildlife is giving money for the agenda.

Price William will be in the country to advocate for United For Wildlife, a charitable organization of which he is the president. He created the organization, along with his brother Prince Harry, in an effort to bring the world’s leading wildlife conservation charities together under a single banner.

“I believe passionately that we have a duty to prevent critically endangered species from being wiped out,” a statement from Prince William says on the organization’s website. “If we get together, everywhere, we can preserve these animals so that they share our world with future generations. That’s what United for Wildlife is all about, and why I’m proud to be involved.”

www.ibtimes.com...

a reply to: Itisnowagain

good. more people, more problems!

originally posted by: conspiracy nut
a reply to: Itisnowagain

good. more people, more problems!

Sorry - can you elaborate please?
Whats good? What more people?

The guide stones say to maintain humanity at 500 millon. That means we will have to lose 6 and a half billion people!!!

a reply to: neoholographic

I happen to like the fellow, but just because one likes someone, does not meant that the individual in question is right. In this instance, the Prince is entirely and absolutely off the mark.

We do not have a population problem, either in this country, or anywhere else. We have a resource problem. We waste too much, and efficiently use too little. We fail to correctly use space, fuels, materials, we wastefully guzzle energy on our roads, lighting them at all hours, when we could make them more efficient by only having them active when cars and pedestrians are actually present. We waste sooo much food here in the UK, and yet our waste per person is DWARFED by that of the United States.

Too much space is given over to trivial matters, too little to locally run agriculture businesses, and housing. We fail to manage correctly the waste we generate, accepting the nonsensical notion that ANY plastic compound cannot be recycled (of course it can, its just expensive, which is irrelevant). We have people driving two hundred yards to the shops, and wondering why they spend so much on fuel, and get so fat. We have people phoning and texting one another from different rooms in the house, rather than climbing the stairs and conversing like human beings.

Its a bloody disaster, but its not because there are too many people in any one country, or too many people on the planet. The problem is that there are too many greedy, lazy, people within all branches of society, because that spawns wasteful and wanton consumption of resources, above and beyond what is necessary or indeed healthy.

a reply to: TrueBrit

originally posted by: TrueBrit
The problem is that there are too many greedy, lazy, people within all branches of society, because that spawns wasteful and wanton consumption of resources, above and beyond what is necessary or indeed healthy.

Yes - that is why there is an agenda to remove them!!
I believe Hitler called them 'undesirables'.

And no doubt they will be able to sell it to the majority - you think that they are the problem!!

If it was put to a vote - I wonder how many would name people who are undesirable? Then the undesirable will have to wear a symbol on their person until they are rounded up.
But remember one day it will be you!

First they came for the Socialists, and I did not speak out—
Because I was not a Socialist.
Then they came for the Trade Unionists, and I did not speak out—
Because I was not a Trade Unionist.
Then they came for the Jews, and I did not speak out—
Because I was not a Jew.
Then they came for me—and there was no one left to speak for me.

originally posted by: EasyPleaseMe
a reply to: EternalShadow
Overpopulation is a little more complicated than the amount of space. It’s about resource usage. If everyone on the planet was to live the same as people in the USA, we would need five Earths to produce the resources.

Not to bite at you but I never believed that study and think it was a pile of Garbage, literally a tool to justify oppression of other's.

For example.

There is enough arable land in North America alone to feed the entire global population many time's over if properly cultivated and that is not even going into the use of high intensity modern farming techniques such as hydroponic's.

Proper recycling could reduce plastic waste and a simple switch to eco friendly plastic substitutes is possible, sources of free energy are literally everywhere and could provide far more than we need even with all our consumer electronic's, geothermal, wind, solar and wave power but guess what that mean's that the petroleum industry is then put out of business because when plastics are made from corn starch and fully renewable power is provided by the earth itself they then struggle to justify ripping you off from your hard earned cash and there slave overlord status become's weakened.

So no need to ditch our consumer economy at all that is simply used to scare people or make them accept less so that they can be more easily controlled.

EVERYTHING we have today has an ecological alternative and guess what many of these ecological alternatives are far more efficient, dependable and far cheaper.

Did you know that the pre-spanish conquest cultures of south america may have produced upwards of over sixty percent more food than today, how many hill's and mountain regions in the US are using terraced hill farming?, how many terraces hill and mountain farm's are abandoned since the Spanish and Portuguese conquest of meso america.

Then let's look at all of that huge - truly vast, huge does not do it justice - arable area's of land in Russia, vast areas of Africa are also arable especially if properly managed and irrigated etc on and on, look at how the ancient's turned Mesopotamian desert into farmland by diverting the rivers into a network or irrigation canal's that have never been rebuilt since the mongol horde swept through and destroyed the ancient canal's and how much of that land is left to rot when it could be easily turned back into modern farmland simply be rebuilding what a supposedly more primitive people once built.

What it is about though seriously is the view of the elite and it is only the elite that to stay in power they have to keep you and me and everyone else DOWN and crushed under there filthy stinking heel's.

There power is not there birth right they stole it from us, they are not more intelligent than we are it is not what you know but who you know.

You know in British waters alone we could produce enough power for the entire EU using Salters duck and other wave power inventions' - free energy driven by the moon and it has the side effect or reducing coastal erosion as the duck take's about ninety percent of the energy of the wave out if it but back when he invented it there was a public study commissioned by the government and - THE SLIP OF A PEN - A CLERICAL ERROR (Yeah right what a load of bollocks) meant that the estimate for the cost for a prototype to be built was overestimated after a decimal point was mysteriously mis-placed in the calculation.

And there are so many more story's, remember the 4 ton ford truck in the US were an inventor and his two friends created some kind of engine attachment and could get it to go a hundred to the gallon in the 1970's but his two friend's were threatened and he ended up in a wheel chair with his life threatened before he had to sign over his patent to the automotive petrol conglomerate.

Do you think that Zero point power is just a pipe dream or that Tesla was a fool, there really is power out there but they will not let YOU or ME have it, why, how could they control us if we were Free of them.

a reply to: LABTECH767

Well I will certainly look clearer at those reports and am guilty of simply parroting that information in this case.

I’ve heard a lot of those myths about 100mpg ‘normal’ cars and I am 100% convinced they are fake because...physics.

a reply to: EasyPleaseMe

I remember hearing about it decades ago, spent a while trying to figure it out myself and remember something about the carburetor, my best guess is probably not a hundred to the gallon but that was the claim and my best guess would be a preheating/vaporizing of the fuel, mixing it with a perfect amount of purified air to try to maximize oxidization during the combustion process and therefore increasing force of the kinetic explosive expansion produced when it is injected it into the cylinder where it would of course be ignited during the down stroke of the cylinder but that is best guess and I do wonder what type of fuel they were using.

I am pretty certain there are fuel's that could do it but if they were using an exotic that would have been part of the original story I am certain but of course all a combustion engine does is harness an explosion, imagine one that ran on nitro glycerin if that was possible which I am pretty sure it is not because explosive force, heat and material's all have to be balanced or the engine just blows up.

My best guess is there is more than a grain of sand to this tale and there are plenty of tale's of invention's lost to the world after being snapped up and hidden by large conglomerates in order to maintain there own monopoly's.

Remember also all a nuclear power station really is at the end of the day is a glorified steam engine, all they have done is replace the coal with fuel rod's as a source of heat to drive teh steam which in turn drives the turbine's that convert that pressure into electricity.

A prince/king claiming the problems in the world is due to the fact that there to many presents? What a "new" idea he's come up with.

Ummm does't he have a THIRD kid on the way? Perhaps he should look inward before he gets all preachy no?

Sorry, double post.

originally posted by: Itisnowagain
There is an agenda to reduce population.
Anyone heard of the Georgia Guide Stones?
Look up Agenda 21.

Don't be fooled into thinking that it is just Prince William or a British thing.
It doesn't matter who appears to be in power - the agenda is world wide.

And those who say there is plenty of room and that you should go and live in nature - people who live in nature in India are being moved - the authorities say it is to protect the tigers and other wild life. The agenda is to move everyone eventually to controlled areas.
Giving money to charities that say they want to protect the wildlife is giving money for the agenda.

Price William will be in the country to advocate for United For Wildlife, a charitable organization of which he is the president. He created the organization, along with his brother Prince Harry, in an effort to bring the world’s leading wildlife conservation charities together under a single banner.

“I believe passionately that we have a duty to prevent critically endangered species from being wiped out,” a statement from Prince William says on the organization’s website. “If we get together, everywhere, we can preserve these animals so that they share our world with future generations. That’s what United for Wildlife is all about, and why I’m proud to be involved.”

www.ibtimes.com...

His Grandadddy Prince Philip had something to do with the World Wildlife Fund, using charity money to buy up valuble land in Africa. They say it's to protect habitats of course but they get to have armed guards patrolling land that has mineral resources.

Old Phil was also involved in the Council of Rome that decided climate change would be a good strategy for population control back in the 70s.

He also said he'd like to come back as a terrible virus to kill off some of the worlds population when he died!

originally posted by: DanDanDat
A prince/king claiming the problems in the world is due to the fact that there to many presents? What a "new" idea he's come up with.

Someone CLAIMING to be a prince/king perhaps.

a reply to: shooterbrody

His ancestors were German, and I don't think they were included in the Visigoth complement in the revolutionary war, so you had nothing to do with whooping his ancestors. His family cleverly usurped the throne over a hundred years ago, changed their name to sound English, and somehow the nation allowed it to happen.... Not saying I disapprove of the existence of the monarchy we now have, but it is kind of ironic, that they had to change their family name during world War One to ensure they weren't lynched when the nation realised how brutal the war was becoming...

a reply to: shooterbrody

I would like to agree with you but from what I understand we're still paying taxes to the UK.

There was a great thread here on ATS - let me find it and I'll post it.

S&F