Hillary Clinton Robbed Bernie Sanders Of The Democratic Nomination, According to Donna Brazile

a reply to: Xcathdra

It’s not a personal attack to point out your continued lying in the thread.

It’s a simple question; provide evidence that any Primary or Caucus was compromised.

originally posted by: Gryphon66
a reply to: Xcathdra

It’s not a personal attack to point out your continued lying in the thread.

It’s a simple question; provide evidence that any Primary or Caucus was compromised.

Example H

Asked and answered. you are in such denial that you are now contradicting the DNC lawyers and the DNC interim chair D. Brazile. Have you told them why you are right and why they are wrong yet?

Again -
7 Jaw-Dropping Revelations From Hearings on the Motion to Dismiss the DNC Fraud Lawsuithggh

Read the above. You will see the information addressed is linked to the court filings by the DNC as responses to the charges.

The key points -

1. The crux of the Motion to Dismiss asserts the Judge is not in a position to determine how the Democratic Party conducts its nominating process.

2. The Democratic Party views itself as having authority to favor a candidate without any legal repercussions.

3. Judge Zloch appeared skeptical, noting the Democrats’ interest to obscure the guarantee of the Party’s impartiality clause.

4. The Democrats insist that “impartial” cannot be defined, so the DNC’s impartiality clause is akin to a political promise in that it can not be guaranteed.

5. DNC’s legal counsel appeared unaware of any procedures in place to determine how the DNC supports state parties as they conduct individual primary nominating contests.

6. The Democrats’ lawyers take the position that while the Democrats are not legally obligated to conduct the primary fairly, they did, in fact, conduct the 2016 primary fairly.

7. In closing remarks, U.S. Federal Court district judge emphasized: “Democracy demands the truth”.

Hillary Clinton Robbed Bernie Sanders Of The Democratic Nomination, According to Donna Brazile

Hillary Clinton’s campaign took over the Democratic National Committee's funding and day-to-day operations early in the primary season and may have used that power to undermine her rival Senator Bernie Sanders, according to the party's one-time interim chairwoman.

The DNC official, Donna Brazile, now a political analyst, wrote in Politico Magazine on Thursday that she discovered an August 2015 agreement between the national committee and Clinton’s campaign and fundraising arm that gave Clinton “control (of) the party’s finances, strategy, and all the money raised” in exchange for taking care of the massive debt leftover from President Barack Obama’s 2012 campaign.

It wasn't illegal, Brazile said, "but it sure looked unethical."

originally posted by: AlaskanDad

originally posted by: Gryphon66
a reply to: AlaskanDad

Then he should have run as an Independent.

That would have done the dems no good at all!!!!

As an independent all he could have done is take votes away from the Dems, as a democrat he could have strengthened the party by bringing the independents votes to the dems!

But I always thought he ran as a Democrat because he didn't stand a chance as an Independent and needed the party to compete for media attention, etc. Now we are hearing how he didn't stand a chance as a Democrat and the party cheated him out of the nomination.

If he had run as an Independent and focused on gathering the signatures, etc. to get his name on the ballot...

So, was it his message or running as a Democrat that earned him so many supporters?

I am so confused on the story with Bernie running as a Democrat and why and what was to gain.....

...and why on earth he still supports the DNC.

It's a tangled web of *whatever,* IMO. I still don't trust Bernie. Somehow he was trapped into running as a Democrat. They probably had something on him. That's how the world of political corruption keeps spinning.

And this is the party so many on the left fight tooth and nail to defend...It's sad really.

a reply to: Xcathdra

You are pointing to a dismissed case.

One more time.

You stated that Bernie Sanders was cheated in the Primaries and/or Caucuses.

What you are providing is evidence that the DNC states that they have the right to organize their nomination process as they determine.

You are not addressing your dishonest claim.

originally posted by: GuidedKill
And this is the party so many on the left fight tooth and nail to defend...It's sad really.

Pointing out lies by right-wing partisans is not defending the Democrats.

originally posted by: Gryphon66
a reply to: Xcathdra

You are pointing to a dismissed case.

One more time.

You stated that Bernie Sanders was cheated in the Primaries and/or Caucuses.

What you are providing is evidence that the DNC states that they have the right to organize their nomination process as they determine.

You are not addressing your dishonest claim.

Example I

They were the DNC lawyers who made their case to dismiss the lawsuit. The suit was dismissed NOT because nothing illegal occurred but because the judge said it was not in federal jurisdiction. A point you made yourself a few pages back when you claimed each state is responsible for its own elections and caucuses.

Hence the reason it was refiled at the state level courts.

a reply to: MotherMayEye

Very cogent post in a thread full of feculent lies.p

a reply to: Gryphon66

I think you might be winning with the liar liar pants on fire strategy here.

Worked really well for me too, in the 3rd grade recess/playground politics of the 1970s.

originally posted by: Gryphon66

originally posted by: GuidedKill
And this is the party so many on the left fight tooth and nail to defend...It's sad really.

Pointing out lies by right-wing partisans is not defending the Democrats.

Example J

cant refute facts so you label and attack people in an effort to undermine their factual argument by trying to bury it in the same failed strategy.

Demand.. dismiss.. Deny.. repeat.

originally posted by: Gryphon66
a reply to: MotherMayEye

Very cogent post in a thread full of feculent lies.p

example K

so tell us.. Have you told the DNC layers and D. Brazile they are wrong and you are right?

If not why havent you?

originally posted by: Gryphon66

originally posted by: GuidedKill
And this is the party so many on the left fight tooth and nail to defend...It's sad really.

Pointing out lies by right-wing partisans is not defending the Democrats.

🙄

Pa reply to: Xcathdra

Which Primary or Caucus was Sanders kept out of?

Which Primary or Caucus was fraudulent?

Which votes cast by Democrats for Sanders were not counted?

Which Primary election was fraudulently administered?

Which Caucus was fraudulently regulated?

Any answers?

originally posted by: Gryphon66
Pa reply to: Xcathdra

Which Primary or Caucus was Sanders kept out of?

Which Primary or Caucus was fraudulent?

Which votes cast by Democrats for Sanders were not counted?

Which Primary election was fraudulently administered?

Which Caucus was fraudulently regulated?

Any answers?

originally posted by: Gryphon66
a reply to: Xcathdra

POST REMOVED BY STAFF

Examples L and M.

You claim im a liar yet offer nothing to refute what I posted, the facts presented or explained why you are right and the DNC layer and former DNC chair are wrong.

are they liars also?

a reply to: Xcathdra

Bernie didnt get robbed....he got rich off of it. He became a instant MILLIONAY...NO REFUNDS!

a reply to: ausername

Care to back that up with evidence?

a reply to: Xcathdra

So, no evidence of anything wrong with any Primary or Caucus then?

Thank goodness that is settled ... I can go back to ignoring your lying posts.

originally posted by: Gryphon66
a reply to: Xcathdra

So, no evidence of anything wrong with any Primary or Caucus then?

Thank goodness that is settled ... I can go back to ignoring your lying posts.

Example N

Intentionally trying to bury facts you cant refute by calling people liars, demanding proof, dismissing it and then demanding it again doesnt change the facts.

The DNC lawyers and DNC chair and a federal court judge all say you are wrong.

Hillary?

Do you have anything on topic by way of intelligent rebuttal? If not why are you intentionally derailing the thread and calling anyone who doesnt agree with you a liar (another democratic tactic)?


We need to add except when your position is different than mine to that meme.

a reply to: LesMisanthrope

So all the nominees can suck money out of their supporters and then turn it over to the DNC when the Queen is coronated...