It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Xcathdra
originally posted by: Gryphon66
There is zero evidence that there were significant irregularities at the Primary or Caucus level.
Please tell us that you are joking...
originally posted by: Gryphon66
That said, the DNC of 2016 has much to answer for, and should be held to account.
They will be - in 2020.
originally posted by: loam
originally posted by: theantediluvian
a reply to: Xcathdra
Not illegal
I would wait until the chickens are hatched before counting them.
Using the state DNC orgs to launder contributions for a campaign puts some people on very thin ice.
originally posted by: elementalgrove
originally posted by: Annee
Bernie had no business running as a Democrat. He's not a Democrat. He's never been a Democrat.
Why should Bernie get special treatment.
Lol it is not a matter of Bernie getting special treatment, it is a matter of honoring the voice of the Democrat base that wanted him.
As well as the independents that were actually going to vote for a "democrat", they conspired against the voice of the people, that is the problem.
Using the state DNC orgs to launder contributions for a campaign puts some people on very thin ice.
originally posted by: Xcathdra
originally posted by: Annee
Bernie had no business running as a Democrat. He's not a Democrat. He's never been a Democrat.
Why should Bernie get special treatment.
Yet the DNC allowed him to run as one.
It's not election fraud under the law. Arguably it was duping the public (Democrats) into thinking the DNC was impartial though. It is corruption but the "dictatorial regime" bit is pure hyperbole.
originally posted by: Gryphon66
a reply to: Xcathdra
You know, for a non-partisan, you're awfully partisan.
originally posted by: DanteGaland
a reply to: Gryphon66
Trying to demoralize liberals.
That's the AGENDA here. Don't fall for it.
SEE it for what psychological trickery it IS.
originally posted by: Xcathdra
originally posted by: Gryphon66
a reply to: Xcathdra
You know, for a non-partisan, you're awfully partisan.
For someone to accuse me of that while ignoring the illegal activity by Clinton / DNC tells me you cant defend what they did because they did it so you decide to attack me to shift focus.
That tactic might work on you.. It doesnt work on me.
originally posted by: Annee
originally posted by: Xcathdra
originally posted by: Annee
Bernie had no business running as a Democrat. He's not a Democrat. He's never been a Democrat.
Why should Bernie get special treatment.
Yet the DNC allowed him to run as one.
I know.
btw - I'm former Republican, currently unaffiliated. I consider Bernie as much a sham as I consider Trump to be.
originally posted by: Gryphon66
a reply to: MotherMayEye
From what I read, Obama's deal extended repayment into 2016, and the Party needed money it didn't have.
The Clinton Campaign supplied that money.