It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: links234
Not gonna lie, these revelations confirm a lot of what I've heard and it's infuriating.
That doesn't mean I'm going to jump ship and start voting for the GOP though.
originally posted by: Indrasweb
Ok so, you'll have to excuse my ignorance on this matter. I'm a damn limey and the US' method of conducting elections is somewhat alien to me. Apologies if I have misunderstood....
That being said; if I understand correctly, the Clintons basically came in and bought out the organisation that is supposed to select a candidate to run for office. Is that accurate?
If it is, then I really cannot fathom how absolutely everyone, on every side of every party line is not utterly and completely disgusted by this.
Some on here saying that this is not illegal? If that is accurate then don't you guys think it should be?
How can you be satisfied with a system that is set up in such a way that it is entirely legal for an individual or individuals to buy their way into positions of power and influence (so blatantly at least!)? To usurp the freedom and democracy you apparently hold so dear and basically sell those positions of power off to the highest bidder?
Those saying, essentially, "well, she would have won anyway": would you say the same if, for example, it turned out that Usain Bolt had used performance enhancing drugs during the last Olympics to guarantee his last haul of gold medals? Would you say "well, he's won every other time and would probably have won this time anyway"?
Or would you consider him to be a dishonourable cheat who should be stripped of any accolades and barred from competing, perhaps even further action taken against him?
Just curious how consistent peoples views are regarding fairness and decency..
Personally, I would be enraged if I were a Bernie supporter, enraged if I were a republican, enraged if I were a lifelong democrat voter, and enraged if I were a Hillary supporter, all for different (though similar at the root of it) reasons.
originally posted by: carewemust
I bet Donna brazile's book will outsell Hillary's book by at least 10 to 1.
originally posted by: xuenchen
originally posted by: carewemust
I bet Donna brazile's book will outsell Hillary's book by at least 10 to 1.
I wonder if Donna is donating the profits to the Clinton Foundation ?
originally posted by: xuenchen
originally posted by: links234
Not gonna lie, these revelations confirm a lot of what I've heard and it's infuriating.
That doesn't mean I'm going to jump ship and start voting for the GOP though.
Just the mere thought of it is enough to keep some people in perpetual disarray.
originally posted by: xuenchen
originally posted by: carewemust
I bet Donna brazile's book will outsell Hillary's book by at least 10 to 1.
I wonder if Donna is donating the profits to the Clinton Foundation ?
originally posted by: carewemust
I bet Donna brazile's book will outsell Hillary's book by at least 10 to 1.
originally posted by: Annee
originally posted by: elementalgrove
originally posted by: Annee
Bernie had no business running as a Democrat. He's not a Democrat. He's never been a Democrat.
Why should Bernie get special treatment.
Lol it is not a matter of Bernie getting special treatment, it is a matter of honoring the voice of the Democrat base that wanted him.
As well as the independents that were actually going to vote for a "democrat", they conspired against the voice of the people, that is the problem.
Anyone who actually takes the time to research Bernie - - will find the truth about him.
Voting for Bernie is the same as voting for Trump. You're voting for an IDEA - - - with zero substance to back it up.
originally posted by: LSU0408
a reply to: Xcathdra
Donna was busted giving Clinton questions to one of the debates. I wonder why she's throwing her under the bus now.
originally posted by: LSU0408
a reply to: amazing
The thought crossed my mind, too... Both sides are gonna have to grow some balls if they don't want another Trump in the White House though. They can both blame themselves.
originally posted by: theantediluvian
a reply to: loam
Using the state DNC orgs to launder contributions for a campaign puts some people on very thin ice.
I'm pretty sure all of this was revealed in the course of the class action lawsuit that was dismissed in Florida. I'm not sure that there's anything in the federal election law that would cover this either but if you have some specific law to cite, I'm all ears.
originally posted by: burntheships
Now reports coming in that the DNC has fired it's top Fundriaser.
Wonder if this is related? Did she dish to Donna?
Wow....