The U.S is run by judges and liberal lobbyists who command them?

Are you guys run by Judges these days? Seems to me like Presidents, Senators, Congressmen are no longer "getting it up" as the power brokers. Just about every decision Trump makes is blocked by some Judge from some state somewhere. You are one sick pseudo democratic puppy.

Watching what has happened to Trump has made me lose all respect for your political processes. It is a laughing stock really. The whole things is sabotaged on every level. Your country is run by Globalists, "Russia" (a joke inclusion), Lobbyists and JUDGES. There ain't much below skin deep voting that really is democratic, not where the POWER is. The real power is outside America. All these shots at Trump are coming from the outside. It is actually astonishing that Trump is so squeaky clean. They are not able to pin anything on him personally. They will, however, totally sabotage his presidency.

I truly hope President Trump gets a second term, just to give the finger to the globalists one more time. That is about the best you will achieve. Democracy is dead, long live the courts. It's #ery on a dark age, medieval level; total devolution and descent into new age barbarianism and savagery.



All in all it's just another brick in Trump's wall.

It's been like that for quite a while now. If you have the money to hire half a dozen lawyers, you walk, with a slap on the wrist. The little guy just does the best he can and hopes the Judge is in a good mood.

a reply to: Revolution9

The judges are nothing more than a tool to help the elites distract and divide the masses.

One of many tools in their back pockets.

In the U.S. we have checks and balances. Trump (the President) runs the country, but that is only the executive branch. The legislative branch (House and Senate) and the judicial branch (judges) serve to make sure that the President doesn't act as a Supreme Leader.

Everything is going exactly as the Founding Fathers intended. Judges are supposed to keep the President in check. It is a little much to assume that the judges "work for liberals" or some such nonsense. They make decisions based on the rule of law and precedent. They are appointed by both liberal and conservative administrations and have the authority to act independently.

a reply to: DAVID64


Lol, now I get it. The way they will bring about a police state is make everyone guilty of a crime and lock us all up. You must be running out of people without criminal records in he U.S. Lol, the Brits are not far behind. Soon every MP will be on the sex offenders' register. It is nuts. No respect left for them. I think we need to get our pitch forks ready and start sticking them in some asses, lol.

We really have become quite insane in the West. All the MSM want to talk about is groping hands. I fear we are doomed!

a reply to: darkbake

Nope, ain't buying that. They never did any of this to Obama did they? I wonder how many of his policies were blocked by judges continually?

Ask yourselves how many times Obama was blocked by a judge during his two terms then you will see clearly Trump is being sabotaged. I am on the outside. The old money here HATE Trump. They are after him. I don't think they will get him as the guy really has not done anything that is actually impeachable.

Checks and balances have become dragging up some judge from some state at a whim's notice. You admit it yourself that judges have all the power in the U.S, by your own words. So you trust a judge who you don't get to vote for above a democratically elected politician?

We have similar in the UK. We have House of Lords. They are not judges though and their powers are a deal more limited. The way the Judges have been used, exploited, poised to manipulate by lobbyists against Trump is not democratic. I keep telling you the attacks on Trump are coming from outside the U.S. As you moan about the Russians there are much more devious agents at work, believe it.

Seeing what I have seen lately makes me realize that politics is quite dead. The NGOs rule the West and always get their way, regardless of who the puppet is. At least Trump tried to be his own man and tried to let America be its own boss.

What a globalist's plaything you are now. Shame, shame, shame!

edition.cnn.com...

Politics is quite lame as it stands. Lets all talk about groping as the real issues get buried.

Yuck! Any how, enough of this. I start to feel nauseous when I talk about this too much as it is pretty noxious and smelly. I better go wash my hands before coffee.

a reply to: Revolution9

Nope. Our federal and State governments have 3 branches which share power & have ways to balance each other (literally called "checks & balances"). Congress and the State Legislatures are the Legislative Branches which literally make the laws. The President & our Governors head the Executive Branches which enforce and interpret those laws. And the Supreme Court, federal court system, and State court system are the Judicial Branches which make sure that laws and their interpretations are allowable (in addition to other judicial functions). ETA: Many times, Congress & State Legislatures will write laws with vague wording specifically to allow the Executive Branch more power in how they interpret & enforce them.

The problem a lot of people have is they think that one branch is above the others & is really in control. But they're not. No President or Governor can simply dictate things here because both the judicial branch and legislative branch can outright nullify their actions. That's why Presidents and Governors have Attorney Generals and similar legal aides in their Cabinets that make sure their proposed policies adhere to existing laws.

Even though the Dubya Bush administration did a lot of screwed up stuff, they were experts at crafting legally allowable interpretations of their policies. Trump's team has simply been too incompetent to do that so far. And he's made things even worse by attacking the very judges who have the power to block his policies and by attacking the very members of Congress that are needed to actually pass his proposed laws (since Congress has to pass those laws before he can sign them into law).

In short, the blame is on Trump because of his ignorance of how to navigate the system and his belligerence towards the very people who have the power to pass and allow his policies. If anything, this administration should show observers just how little power a President actually has. Remember all that "Obama's a dictator" crap? LOL

a reply to: Revolution9 Dude you are acting a fool. Have you ever read the bill of rights or amy other part of Govt? Well maybe you should atleast read on that and your state laws to get a grip. Till then let the big boys play. Happy hunting

a reply to: Revolution9

Are you guys run by Judges these days?

Yes indeed. Get rid of all those pesky liberal judges and replace them with Trump yesmen so he can do whatever he wants.

Yes yes. As the Founders intended.

a reply to: enlightenedservant

In short, the blame is on Trump because of his ignorance of how to navigate the system and his belligerence towards the very people who have the power to pass and allow his policies. If anything, this administration should show observers just how little power a President actually has. Remember all that "Obama's a dictator" crap? LOL

excellently put, and if i may add, trumps non inteligencia approach has garnered many supporters that simply don't understand politics or policies.
we have seen the same in britain with brain dead masses joining ukip and believing they understand politics.

a reply to: cinerama

But but but... politicians are only in it for themselves.

All these laws and regulations against doing things you want to ... only thinking of themselves.

I'm glad some people seem to make some sense...even if it isn't common, these days

Is mental retardation contagious?

I once thought, "of course not" ...but these days, it would explain a few things.

a reply to: Revolution9

Dude, I know this is a conspiracy site but what you are saying is delusional.

It's not how law works, not in the US or in the UK.

At the end of the day, policies and legislation are not going to get passed if they can be interpreted as unconstitutional or unlawful.

It is that simple.

Trump and his team are clearly useless and to go around blaming anyone other than themselves is just deflection.

Now I'm not saying corruption doesn't exist nor that shady business doesn't happen. But to say the whole judicial and legislative side of the US is bought by liberals is crazy.

It's like me saying the Tories run all aspects of our equivalents, which is utter bs considering our own courts have passed judgement upon their policies and legislation.

I'm grateful for such systems, we do not live in dictatorships, governments should be able to be held accountable and must operate within law.

a reply to: Revolution9

Judges server the corporations no one else.

a reply to: Revolution9

Yah things are screwed up. Injunctions are nothing new, even though the article makes them sound 'routine' now...

...they started in the late 20th century but were rare until the last part of President Barack Obama's second term, when Republican attorneys general started getting national injunctions to stop the Obama administration. Now, the tables are turned.

Democratic attorneys general are getting national injunctions to stop the Trump administration.

Its not a matter of left or right, its whether its for the people or not. If its for the people like healthcare and immigration, you see this endless back and forth, nothing getting done.

If its for war and global domination however, notice they don't slap injunctions on any of that...

a reply to: RAY1990

Great post. The author of the OP needs to read more.

a reply to: RAY1990

I'm grateful for such systems, we do not live in dictatorships, governments should be able to be held accountable and must operate within law.

- insert the applause GIF of your choice -

a reply to: darkbake

Fair to say not all judges, but also fair to say that in terms of reigning in corruption, the ones that matter in at least 3 cases, are.

a reply to: RAY1990

At the end of the day, policies and legislation are not going to get passed if they can be interpreted as unconstitutional or unlawful.

It is that simple.

Really... endless undeclared war, lawful?

In March, the "administration" has made troop deployments to Syria and Iraq more secret. Wheres the Constitution, the executive and judiciary 'checks and balances' on that?

Earlier this month, the Pentagon quietly dispatched 400 Marines to northern Syria to operate artillery in support of Syrian militias that are cooperating in the fight against Islamic State, according to U.S. officials. That was the first use of U.S. Marines in that country since its long civil war began.

In Iraq, nearly 300 Army paratroopers were deployed recently to help the Iraqi military in their six-month assault on the city of Mosul, according to U.S. officials.

Neither of those deployments was announced once they had been made, a departure from the practice of the Obama administration, which announced nearly all conventional force deployments.

LA Times

I don't see ether side, or the people for that matter, raising any questions about this.

a reply to: intrptr

It doesn't seem like the US military is any longer of Constitutional control.