It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Vector99
a reply to: Asktheanimals
This guy shot all of those people. There weren't second and third shooters. He wasn't a patsy.
originally posted by: pheonix358
a reply to: Vector99
This guy shot all of those people.
Currently there is no proof unless you have some. No? Didn't think so.
All we have is one body and so many holes in the ever changing narrative.
P
originally posted by: Vector99
a reply to: Asktheanimals
I appreciate your perseverance towards a conspiracy, but as a Las Vegas resident and someone who actually knows a few people that were at the concert, you are insulting those that died or were injured by continuing to spew nonsense based theories.
This guy shot all of those people. There weren't second and third shooters. He wasn't a patsy.
originally posted by: Vector99
a reply to: EternalShadow
No, I have what has been reported so far, and yes the timeline has changed but that is all.
There is literally zero evidence of a second shooter so how about not being a jackass?
originally posted by: Vector99
a reply to: MotherMayEye
And these testimonies are where? In your mind?
originally posted by: Vector99
a reply to: EternalShadow
No, I have what has been reported so far, and yes the timeline has changed but that is all.
There is literally zero evidence of a second shooter so how about not being a jackass?
Hold on a sec, you are saying there is no evidence that this one guy did the shooting?
This is some rogue event and Paddock is the patsy?
Are you literally out of your mind?
Of course there's evidence...That's why so many claim there was more than one shooter...Two different weapons with two different rates of fire going off at the same time...If that's not evidence explain what it is...
originally posted by: Vector99
a reply to: EternalShadow
No, I have what has been reported so far, and yes the timeline has changed but that is all.
There is literally zero evidence of a second shooter so how about not being a jackass?
originally posted by: truthnlies
originally posted by: Vector99
a reply to: EternalShadow
No, I have what has been reported so far, and yes the timeline has changed but that is all.
There is literally zero evidence of a second shooter so how about not being a jackass?
so youre tellin me that you ACTUALLY believe what the MSM tells us??
originally posted by: Vector99
however if the narrative presented is determined truth I expect all of the skeptics to be in here asap to apologize.
originally posted by: Vector99
a reply to: Asktheanimals
I appreciate your perseverance towards a conspiracy, but as a Las Vegas resident and someone who actually knows a few people that were at the concert, you are insulting those that died or were injured by continuing to spew nonsense based theories.
This guy shot all of those people. There weren't second and third shooters. He wasn't a patsy.