Las Vegas coroner’s office on lockdown — but why?

originally posted by: TonyS
a reply to: ElectricUniverse

Its a cover up, what else did you expect?

Where are the victims bodies? Are they at the coroner's office? If they are, and I'd think they'd have to be because in a criminal case the ME has to provide a thorough cause of death. My guess is they can't let anyone catch on to the fact that such a large number of the victims were killed with head shots, obviously by a sniper and not by some loon doing a bump fire spray n' pray.

Then of course........there's the question of who was the dead shooter anyway; and that prompts the question was it Paddock or is Paddock off somewhere in witness protection?

This whole thing stinks to high heaven. They REALLY botched this one up.

You do realise that the majority of victims suffering head wounds is exactly what should be seen in this case as he was firing from an elevated position? Snipers don't aim for the head the target is center mass.

a reply to: ElectricUniverse

A lot of autopsies need to be performed and those bodies, and what they contain, are considered evidence.

originally posted by: Krakatoa
Perhaps because the press are vultures and they want to keep the area clear to allow the professionals to do their jobs without any interference? This is a major case, so erring on the side of caution is warranted when you have "keyboard coroners" clamoring to make up unfounded stories and leaks of "anonymous sources" go viral.

So, you lockdown the office to provide a way to deny that aspect from tainting the findings of the investigation.

That doesn't really wash. Lock downs like this never happen with official offices unless there is something to protect, like the truth being embargoed.

originally posted by: Xcathdra
a reply to: ElectricUniverse

A lot of autopsies need to be performed and those bodies, and what they contain, are considered evidence.

The autopsies had already been done a while ago. We are talking about the Las Vegas coroner's office being put on lockdown after the bodies of the victims had been already released to their families.

a reply to: ElectricUniverse

How about the actual sitting coroner had to be replaced because he refused to go along with the cover story of a single shooter?

He would be more that capable of easily and readily recognizing the signs of that on 60 bodies flooding in for autopsies.

He balked when threatened for his non compliance, summarily executed in his own office, and now they need a couple weeks to clean up and make the transition to the new coroner who will say all 60 were shot by a single man from a single position.

See JFK, Sandy Hook, et al.

The preceding statement is intended only as reckless conspiracy mongering and is for entertainment purposes only

😎

a reply to: ElectricUniverse

Oh please...

You can try to dress this up as much as you like, but the only difference between the Las Vegas event and the first tower sniping incident which has any similarity to it, is the number of dead, the wealth of the perpetrator and the speed at which the slaughter commenced. There is no evidence of any kind, which suggests that this incident was in any way politically motivated at this stage.

You have a man whose father was a psychopathic bank robber, conman and all round bastard, making his children statistically more likely to express the genetic quirk which causes psychopathy, who happened to have enough money and time in his life, to take it into his head to do something barbaric.

At this stage, assuming any political motivation on his part is insane, and its worth mentioning that the only people of note who have tried to call this for the "Oh, hes a lefty and wanted to kill right wingers" crowd, have been peddling clearly flawed data, pertaining to the ex husband of Paddocks significant other, a hold over from when people jumped the gun, and accused her ex, rather than Paddock himself.

"Las Vegas coroner’s office on lockdown — but why?"


People are dying to get in.

Too soon?

a reply to: sg1642

Actually it depends on the range. The other sniper was closer and lower. Military snipers run by the rule, one shot one kill, they do headshots when possible at a closer range. The very best thrill to one-headshot, two kills, where the bullet traverses through two skulls. The machine gun type fire from Mandalay Bay was cover fire. I dont think many were killed from that position, unless there was a military trained sniper doing the shooting.

originally posted by: TonyS
a reply to: sg1642

Actually it depends on the range. The other sniper was closer and lower. Military snipers run by the rule, one shot one kill, they do headshots when possible at a closer range. The very best thrill to one-headshot, two kills, where the bullet traverses through two skulls. The machine gun type fire from Mandalay Bay was cover fire. I dont think many were killed from that position, unless there was a military trained sniper doing the shooting.

Actually it doesn't depend on the range. If you are firing down at a large crowd there are likely to be a lot of head wounds. Snipers work off accuracy and aim center mass. The whole headshot thing is very rare and most of them happen by accident. If you aim at the chest and your clicks are out one of two things will happen. You'll go high (and take someone's head off) or go low (and take someone's stomach out). Nobody would need to be military trained to injure or kill a lot of people from the tower. Firing at twenty thousand people 400m away in an area the size of a football field and injuring a large number wouldn't require a trained shooter. You're trying to tell me how snipers work and its something I did when I was in the military.

Has anyone seen anything else about this? Do we know if the office is still on lockdown?