Honors student outs herself as Athiest, kisses her honors good bye

a reply to: ClovenSky

No it's the factually incorrect information that she's delivering. It's also the Religious ideas she's promoting which are the problem.

I actually agree with some of the things she's saying. She's making some good suggestions and ideas in some cases but she's also mixing it with incorrect science and made up BS.

She's mixing Beliefs and Facts together as if they're all the same and should be taken and understood the same. That isn't how it works. Beliefs aren't always Facts and some Facts aren't always Believed.

She's pushing Belief Based Ideas along with Factual Information together. That's not Education that's indoctrination.

a reply to: ClovenSky

Was this a reply to me?

a reply to: OrdoAdChao

Im from New York. Yeah it was cool. Sometimes we could just ask for an outside opinion right in class.

In grade school we had some Hindu girls that were the best students on earth. They sometimes helped the Catholic kids with our religion work.

It was good for everyone.

a reply to: tadaman

I have no problem with religion being taught as a subject. You need a society that accepts religion as a personal right in order to have Hindu siblings helping Catholic kids with their studies. I would never argue against this. Religion is a place for study, comparison and question. It is an educational place. Dogmatism and faith belong well outside religion and education. Faithful dogmatists are the greatest enemy to freedom of religion and thought.

ETA:

I am not trying to move goal posts. I really just want this discussion to remain sane and on topic. It's a tough one to keep on because the story so far is incomplete. I started this thread with the evidence before it, and need to learn a lesson on keeping it together - that is, predict the future (not so hard `round these parts) and shoot down the common arguments in the OP.

I appreciate the education!

At first I thought the brain sperm theory was a joke.

So I had this image of all these sperm hanging out in the man-cave somewhere deep in the woman's brain. Sitting around chugging beers, watching porn movies, and bragging about their sexual accomplishments.

And, I'm really hoping that my little swimmers have enough to talk about...



-dex

a reply to: mOjOm

Science based may mean that using the scientific method give it scientific cred . Even heavily biased papers get into the literature . I was reading about a study that said men have a advantage in Physics because they pee standing up . It seemed to be biased because it was a SJW speaking out for woman's rights . Imagine peeing while standing is a exercise in projectile math .... If a true study then I am sure they included Muslim men who practice squatting to pee but that small fact was not mentioned ... As to the sperm imprint on women's brains I am still on the fence on that one ..

a reply to: DexterRiley

The Brain Drilling Sperm theory is a joke. It's a bad joke in fact and isn't true and shouln't be propagated as being true either.

It's a bad idea, an infectious and hostile meme in that sense and was most likely created for that exact reason. But might also have just been created by accident. But is certainly at this point being kept alive and promoted for the most part to support a false and negative agenda by those who want to further that agenda.

When in fact it should be placed in the section of ideas along with other fictions that we all dismiss as being untrue. Not promoted as being accurate or factual or good science or even a good idea to believe in.

a reply to: DexterRiley

You better get out thar and make some brain babies!

This is so good.

Half of the thread is religious, the other half is sperm drilling into women's brains.

This is ATS!

originally posted by: OrdoAdChao
This is so good.

Half of the thread is religious, the other half is sperm drilling into women's brains.

This is ATS!

I vote for your thread to be one of the strangest ATS threads ever.

a reply to: tadaman

The ACLU seems to disagree...

Since private and parochial schools aren't run by the government, the First Amendment doesn't apply to them.

Source: www.aclu.org...

originally posted by: OrdoAdChao
a reply to: DexterRiley

You better get out thar and make some brain babies!

a reply to: mOjOm

Of course it's absolutely ludicrous. I don't know whether the subject of multiple sperm cells per individual partner is addressed in this "theory." I won't waste the time on it to find out.

However, if it is the case that one partner can embed more than one cell, a sexually active woman married for many decades wouldn't have much room left in her skull for the rest of her brain.


-dex

a reply to: the2ofusr1

So, I just asked my SO of 10 years if she felt that the other SOs she's had before planted their sperm in her brain. She looked at me really funny. She's a lab tech and works with cells a bit for the doctor that has allowed me to observe specimens for fun and education. I know what she has seen, and boy, I don't want to go there.

You don't need rabid sperm to explain behavioral patterns of human females. The door is over there. Your idea is outside.

But that's all fake news and lies. Disregard this.

a reply to: the2ofusr1

As we both know, not all Science is good Science. Also, not even all Good Science produces accurate Conclusions. It's simply our best known method of getting accurate, repeatable, objective information about the world around us. But sometimes mistakes are made or bias may influence the thinking to some degree or any number of things. But for the most part it removes the known problems which need to be avoided to get accurate information.

It works really good too. It's cleared away so much bad knowledge that we held as true and made clear what were the reliable things that were consistent, practical, universally true, etc. But it's going to have it's limits too since not everything about existence is explained in physical models or universal standards like that. But you can apply the scientific methods in many other ways too even in those areas sometimes.

But one thing it has helped in, is allowing us to reliably test certain ideas and areas of our understanding of things for their accuracy and which weren't accurate. Basically to know which ideas were true and which were not. That doesn't mean it's the only possible way to understand stuff or anything.

a reply to: Deaf Alien

Regardless of politics or religion, everyone should watch that flick.

It's a fine showing in how bad things could get; special effects, acting and storytelling BE DAMNED.

Why isn't the side show an attraction of curiosity? Because it's the main event!

a reply to: DexterRiley

LOL

Maybe that's where the phrase, "She screwed her brains out." comes from??

Because you're right. Displacement would have to be accounted for so a very sexually active woman of some age would literally just have a head full of sperm at some point. Or a head like a balloon or something.

Plus, if that is how gene transfer happened there would be so many mutants happening everywhere that the stability of genetics would collapse.

a reply to: mOjOm

I love natural selection at its most basic. And in reality this shoots down the sperm argument.

But, in a nutshell: The female sex organs have evolved to kill sperm which aren't fit for the environment, which includes at least 80% of sperm released in a typical "situation". Of the remainder, only 1% will make it to the egg, which of course leads to a single sperm fertilizing.

a reply to: OrdoAdChao

Exactly. In fact just our bodies in general resist all kinds of foreign objects that might get in us. Our bodies have some cool defensive abilities that are active within us automatically. Otherwise life would be way too messy if it could even happen at all. You couldn't have so much genetic influence and change happening so easily and expect to get anything to hold together or function well.

Things would just rapidly become a big soupy mess of mixed up code in the wrong places.

Also, it's kind of scary to imagine what drilling sperm of that type would actually be like. I mean I don't think I'd like those vicious little bastards hanging out in my sack to begin with. What would keep them from tunneling into somewhere else in me also?? What kind of damage would those suckers be doing when I wasn't keeping them busy just swimming in circles?? Way too hostile to be carrying something like around like that.

WTF are you all arguing sperm and women's brains? What has that to do with the original topic and OP?

Serious question.