Drones Did Vegas Shooting ⁈ Paddock Deep State IRS LockHeed NASA

The complaint about the lack of spent shells around Paddock's body is pretty silly. He wasn't firing from the middle of the room, where he died. He was firing out the window. There is clearly at least one window in the photos, and the view from the floor to the lower part of the window is blocked by a massive great sofa.

So the natural reading is that Paddock was firing while sitting on one of those sofas, or perhaps standing between the sofa and the window, and the shell cases fell onto the floor directly beneath the window and so they simply weren't captured in the photos we've seen so far.

There are plenty of anomalies that are worth consideration, but this isn't one of them.

originally posted by: audubon
The complaint about the lack of spent shells around Paddock's body is pretty silly. He wasn't firing from the middle of the room, where he died. He was firing out the window. There is clearly at least one window in the photos, and the view from the floor to the lower part of the window is blocked by a massive great sofa.

So the natural reading is that Paddock was firing while sitting on one of those sofas, or perhaps standing between the sofa and the window, and the shell cases fell onto the floor directly beneath the window and so they simply weren't captured in the photos we've seen so far.

There are plenty of anomalies that are worth consideration, but this isn't one of them.

Correct. The other issue is all the rounds he shot Down the hall after that Security guy. Seen no evidence of that.
But they did show a Picture of a perferated door?

So far there are no evidence that Paddock did shoot Down the hall.

a reply to: ProphetZoroaster

Five MORE things that don’t add up about the Las Vegas massacre… Where is all the expended brass?

possible answer for number one, he fired from two rooms, 32-134 and 32-135, windows busted out in both.
also depending on where and the angle he firing from standing or prone the casings could have went out the windows.

possible answer for number two, can you see under the casings? plus the rifle barrels wouldn't necessarily touch the carpet, it is possible the hand rails/ guards bipods would keep them from touching the carpet, and you can't see the rifle that is under him.


possible answer for number three, that has always been so, remember the saying when seconds count the police are only minutes away. many police officers recommend and well tell you to arm yourself because most times by the time they get there the crime is done and over with, and all they can do is investigate.

possible answer for number four, you can make AR from different manufacturers look the same, plus you can buy more than one of the same model, which are produced to the same specs and appearance.

definite answer for number five, he was not taking sniper shots he was spraying the crowd. and most people that work for the MSM don't know what the ___ their talking about.

possible answer for number five, i think the first single shots fired were for two things, trying to blow up the fuel tanks. and checking his dope that he had the points of aim listed on the note on the table.

In summary, mission possible. a man that has the intelligence that he was reported as having, the money and everything about his personality that was reported about him says, that he knew his weapons and ammo and planned this extremely well.

now are they hiding something? could be. was it multiple shooters? i doubt it very seriously. did he have ties to someone or was he pulling a lone wolf, or just bat sh@@ crazy? one of these is what i think.

originally posted by: spy66
[
So far there are no evidence that Paddock did shoot Down the hall.

So far there is no evidence of paddock doing anything other than dying...

originally posted by: djz3ro

originally posted by: spy66
[
So far there are no evidence that Paddock did shoot Down the hall.

So far there is no evidence of paddock doing anything other than dying...

I have been saying that all along

Could it be possible that either Campos or the other guy used a master key to open the doors to Paddocks rooms?

Anyone know if any of them would have a master key?

a reply to: spy66

The other issue is all the rounds he shot Down the hall after that Security guy. Seen no evidence of that.
But they did show a Picture of a perferated door?

So far there are no evidence that Paddock did shoot Down the hall.

You mean "no evidence apart from the door that has been riddled with bullet holes, which I myself have just mentioned"?

OK...

Anyway, here's the picture I think you're referring to. It's unclear to me where the shots might have been fired from, but there's only an absolutely tiny and irregular area of floor visible, so it's not very helpful anyway.



But here's the thing - this is a police investigation, not a reality TV show, and the police aren't out to win viewers over to their version of events. When it comes to the shell casings "issue", it might not be an issue at all. We, the public, don't have access to the crime scene, and we can't dictate what evidence is made public by the police. We can speculate, but we certainly can't do more than that. On this particular point about expended shells, at least.

a reply to: audubon


Well Campos and the other guy said that Paddock shot massive of rounds after them Down the hall. The police and the FBI even made them herros because of that. Sure they would display some more eveidence that this actually did take Place.....dont you thin?



It is just odd to me that they have not.......


There is no doubt in my mind that if it really happened they would of taken Pictures of impact Points on the walls Down the hall to prove that this actually did take Place......

Ellen would probably even have asked Campose where he was hiding as Paddock was spraying rounds after him...... I think this question is a important pice of the Equation....

a reply to: djz3ro


Well there is some proof that a rifle was firing from the Mandalay Bay location, and another unknown location.

www.youtube.com...

a reply to: audubon


True, but some of us have fired automatic and semi-automatic weapons. Depending upon which way any given weapon ejects the spent cartridges, forward or backward, policing the brass is something every soldier learned in training.

We have not been told which weapon was used by Paddock, but in the highly unlikely case he was firing at 100% efficiency, we are looking for something like 1000 spent cartridges. So far we've been shown only 100 or less.

True, we don't know how many, or any, were ejected forwards to whatever it is below, sidewalk or street, so maybe the others are there.

In short, all we know is what we've been told, precious little.

originally posted by: djz3ro

originally posted by: spy66
[
So far there are no evidence that Paddock did shoot Down the hall.

So far there is no evidence of paddock doing anything other than dying...

I'm not even positive about that.
We don't know the 1st fact about him, only what has been told us.
Is he even an actual person?

This brings me to wonder what the purpose of it was, who benefits and how. I don't see the OS holding up to public scrutiny so most are already forgetting about it. Is this to be the standard technique to get the public to ignore important events? Keep changing a story until everyone gives up on getting any facts and moves on. It's a modified version of stonewalling, my ex should be a script writer for DHS who is, I suspect, the main player behind all this.

So far all we really know is the MGM owners sold off their stock and made a bundle before prices tanked.
Maybe this will help sell scanners and more security nation wide, a few billion to be made there.
No significant anti-gun legislation is or will come of this.
Banning bump fire stocks would be doing the shooting community a favor since they're garbage.

The problem with the public losing interest is there is no emotional impact to help push through legislation so it all seems pointless yet everything screams this was black op.

This might sound strange but the Las Vegas shooting seems incomplete, like something was supposed to follow but didn't or will happen soon. Waiting for the other shoe to drop in other words.
Perhaps there are forces within the shadow government stopping various events from happening.
I have to keep faith that there are good people inside who will fight to keep the crazies from destroying the country.

originally posted by: Asktheanimals

originally posted by: djz3ro

originally posted by: spy66
[
So far there are no evidence that Paddock did shoot Down the hall.

So far there is no evidence of paddock doing anything other than dying...

I'm not even positive about that.
We don't know the 1st fact about him, only what has been told us.
Is he even an actual person?

This brings me to wonder what the purpose of it was, who benefits and how. I don't see the OS holding up to public scrutiny so most are already forgetting about it. Is this to be the standard technique to get the public to ignore important events? Keep changing a story until everyone gives up on getting any facts and moves on. It's a modified version of stonewalling, my ex should be a script writer for DHS who is, I suspect, the main player behind all this.

So far all we really know is the MGM owners sold off their stock and made a bundle before prices tanked.
Maybe this will help sell scanners and more security nation wide, a few billion to be made there.
No significant anti-gun legislation is or will come of this.
Banning bump fire stocks would be doing the shooting community a favor since they're garbage.

The problem with the public losing interest is there is no emotional impact to help push through legislation so it all seems pointless yet everything screams this was black op.

This might sound strange but the Las Vegas shooting seems incomplete, like something was supposed to follow but didn't or will happen soon. Waiting for the other shoe to drop in other words.
Perhaps there are forces within the shadow government stopping various events from happening.
I have to keep faith that there are good people inside who will fight to keep the crazies from destroying the country.

If you (the media) keep bombarding people with new stories of events (look at how the "Breaking News"-header is getting abused nowadays), at some point people will get immune to news and only follow their interests. Coincidentally their could be people in power realising and taking advantage of that fact and thereby be getting away with murder, 'cause noone gives a damn. Not many years down the line I'm afraid.

a reply to: TheWorldIsYours

I think part of it is simply the FBI doesnt want to give away to much information on how to pull this off. Every outdoor event is vulnerable to an attack giving away a hand book on how wouldnt be very smart. So you leave out details onpurpose like how easy it was to sneak weapons in to the room. Or how he set up stands to help him. Or even what failed and why in his plan.

the POLICE BODYCAM footage breaching the room clearly shows multiple officers stating verbally there are no broken windows. even all the curtains were closed. then you hear then getting reports of gunfire outside the casino after the breach.

My guess is whoever did the shooting did it from outside the hotel.

Police bodycam NO BROKEN WINDOWS

Police bodycam GUNSHOTS OUTSIDE