posted on Oct, 14 2017 @ 05:51 PM
originally posted by: Plotus
a reply to: DexterRiley
Keeping that in mind, '
While I don't particularly care for the "racial epithets" in question, I believe they are central to the racial inequality theme of the book'
*********************************************************************************************************************
Here's a thought. If all things that offend blacks (blacks mostly) are eliminated and history is wiped clean and 2020 starts a new Epoch, how will
Blacks, or anyone else even consider reparations or legal actions ?
40-50 years from now books will be scares, history books as useful as 1950 Encyclopedia Britannica that they used to sell door to door..
I'm not completely sure I understand the question. However, I'll give you my opinions on the topics you list.
First off, let me modify my position. I still stand by the spirit of my previous post. However, perhaps it makes more sense to reserve this
book for a high school curriculum. I believe that is where it was required reading for me all those many years ago. 8th grade students may not have
the maturity to fully understand the context of the racial themes in TKAM.
Now, in this day and age, subject matter that presumably offends blacks are generally taken up by those of a left leaning political persuasion. In
fact, it is not unusual for white people to be the ones to push this political correctness. In fact, it is not unusual for some African-Americans to
look at these
tempests in a teapot and simply write it off to "that's white folks for ya," then go about their business.
Of course those of a right-leaning political position have their
tempests in a teapot as well. As was mentioned previously, Harry Potter is an
example of a book that is considered evil by some members of the religious right. I disagree with that position as well.
As far as reparations are concerned, I think that time passed a long time ago. I believe Affirmative action was an attempt at it, but that eventually
fell into disfavor.
As far as sanitizing history is concerned, there has been a ongoing effort on the right to paint the founding fathers in a better light by downplaying
the fact that most all of them were slave holders. I don't agree with this either, as it was part of our history and we should learn from it. I
don't think any less of these men because they owned slaves. It was part and parcel of being a person of wealth and means.
Literature should not be sanitized to make people feel better. A great literary work loses its meaning when certain words and phrases are rewritten,
or otherwise modified to be more politically correct. History is what it is. When certain aspects of our past are downplayed in order to make an
historical figure more politically acceptable it does a disservice to everyone.
Just MHO.
-dex