It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: dfnj2015
originally posted by: Gryphon66
Great, if it passes (which it won't) into law we'll have yet another judicial decision backing up Roe v. Wade.
Awesome!
The Congressional and Executive branches are MORE powerful than the Judicial branch of government. Republicans can pass a law making Roe v. Wade irrelevant is the way I understand it.
originally posted by: dfnj2015
originally posted by: Gryphon66
Great, if it passes (which it won't) into law we'll have yet another judicial decision backing up Roe v. Wade.
Awesome!
The Congressional and Executive branches are MORE powerful than the Judicial branch of government. Republicans can pass a law making Roe v. Wade irrelevant is the way I understand it.
originally posted by: kurthall
originally posted by: Gryphon66
Great, if it passes (which it won't) into law we'll have yet another judicial decision backing up Roe v. Wade.
Awesome!
What are you talking about "if it passes", it already did. I don't know why you are saying it wont pass. Also this is nowhere near a Roe VS Wade.
originally posted by: Bluntone22
I'm totally fine with this if they added two more points.
1, a birth defect rider.
For obvious reasons.
2, ease adoption regulations.
It's stupid that I can adopt a foreign kid easier than an American kid.
originally posted by: Painterz
a reply to: Edumakated
Abortion isn't used as birth control though.
originally posted by: SlapMonkey
originally posted by: Gryphon66
... that you're feeding ...
Better than aborting it.
originally posted by: face23785
originally posted by: Painterz
a reply to: Edumakated
Abortion isn't used as birth control though.
It most certainly is. I have a friend who is going through the process to get one now because her boyfriend doesn't know how to use a condom properly.
Yes, they have directions and there's a right way and a wrong way to use them.
originally posted by: the owlbear
originally posted by: Bluntone22
I'm totally fine with this if they added two more points.
1, a birth defect rider.
For obvious reasons.
2, ease adoption regulations.
It's stupid that I can adopt a foreign kid easier than an American kid.
Ease adoption regulations?
That would mean them Homer Sexuals would be able to adopt good USA bred Christian babies to further their GAY AGENDA!!! No Republican would back that publicly.
originally posted by: Bluntone22
originally posted by: the owlbear
originally posted by: Bluntone22
I'm totally fine with this if they added two more points.
1, a birth defect rider.
For obvious reasons.
2, ease adoption regulations.
It's stupid that I can adopt a foreign kid easier than an American kid.
Ease adoption regulations?
That would mean them Homer Sexuals would be able to adopt good USA bred Christian babies to further their GAY AGENDA!!! No Republican would back that publicly.
Yup, it's about as likely as liberals agreeing to put limits on abortions.
Maybe if something was in the bill about forcing insurance companies to cover birth control pills.
Nah, who am I kidding? Nobody is ever willing to compromise.
originally posted by: Bluntone22
a reply to: Gryphon66
Also proving how rare of a gift pregnancy really is.