It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
BERLIN • Germany has asked the U.S. military for classified data on two Boeing fighter jets as it looks to replace its aging Tornado warplanes, giving a potential boost to the U.S. company locked in a trade dispute with Canada and Britain.
A letter sent by the German defense ministry's planning division, reviewed by Reuters, said it had identified Boeing's F-15 and F/A-18E/F fighters as potential candidates to replace the Tornado jets, which entered service in 1981. Both fighters are made in St. Louis.
A classified briefing is expected to take place in mid-November, following a similar briefing provided by U.S. officials about the Lockheed Martin Corp. F-35 fighter jet in July.
originally posted by: tinner07
So what do you think happens at this meeting?
Is it like a used car salesman talking up how great these planes are and for a few extra bucks they can get an extended warranty?
Asking for classified data and all? I know they are our allies.
And in all seriousness, lets say they do purchase 10 F-15's, How long do you think it would take for their best pilots to become proficient in the F-15 or 18? Are they like cars? brakes on the left gas pedal on the right and a damn steering wheel turns ya only with a few extra buttons to fire missles?
Question is why Germans do not want F35?
originally posted by: moebius
There is some talk (could be pure speculation) that the primary reason to look for an interim replacement is the NATO nuclear sharing arrangement. Without the Tornados they don't have any platform to carry the B61 nuclear bombs, as the Eurofighter does not have this capability. That is pretty much why they still keep them around.
originally posted by: mightmight
originally posted by: moebius
There is some talk (could be pure speculation) that the primary reason to look for an interim replacement is the NATO nuclear sharing arrangement. Without the Tornados they don't have any platform to carry the B61 nuclear bombs, as the Eurofighter does not have this capability. That is pretty much why they still keep them around.
The idea that the Luftwaffe should purchase a Tornado replacement because of the nuclear capability is a non starter.
The nuclear sharing arrangement and more importantely the 20 or so B61 nuclear bombs sotred at Büchel AB are highly unpopular in Germany. There is wide spread political support to get rid of them.
In fact, too many politicans might be inclined to torpedo any replacement effort because of the nuclear capability instead of supporting the purchase because of it...
The Tornados are kept around for two reasons:
Tornade Recce is innocent in the eyes of German politicans. Reconnaissance has never hurt anyone. So much less risky to deploy an unarmed recon jet than actually drop bombs on someone.
And the same is true for the Tornado ECR. SEAD is far less... messy than dropping bombs. If there is no way around it and they to deploy combat aircraft, its so much better to shoot HARMs at radars than to drop bombs at bridges...
As for German Tornados IDS - better to pretend they dont exist, upgrade them very slowly and dont purchase the neccessary ordnance. Some ally might actually demand to use them. Cant have that.
Same is true for the German Eurofighter.
The German Air Force intends to keep 46 Tornado IDS of JaBoG 33 in service until at least 2025 to ensure Germany's participation in NATO's nuclear sharing concept.
originally posted by: mightmight
originally posted by: moebius
There is some talk (could be pure speculation) that the primary reason to look for an interim replacement is the NATO nuclear sharing arrangement. Without the Tornados they don't have any platform to carry the B61 nuclear bombs, as the Eurofighter does not have this capability. That is pretty much why they still keep them around.
The idea that the Luftwaffe should purchase a Tornado replacement because of the nuclear capability is a non starter.
The nuclear sharing arrangement and more importantely the 20 or so B61 nuclear bombs sotred at Büchel AB are highly unpopular in Germany. There is wide spread political support to get rid of them.
In fact, too many politicans might be inclined to torpedo any replacement effort because of the nuclear capability instead of supporting the purchase because of it...
The Tornados are kept around for two reasons:
Tornade Recce is innocent in the eyes of German politicans. Reconnaissance has never hurt anyone. So much less risky to deploy an unarmed recon jet than actually drop bombs on someone.
And the same is true for the Tornado ECR. SEAD is far less... messy than dropping bombs. If there is no way around it and they to deploy combat aircraft, its so much better to shoot HARMs at radars than to drop bombs at bridges...
As for German Tornados IDS - better to pretend they dont exist, upgrade them very slowly and dont purchase the neccessary ordnance. Some ally might actually demand to use them. Cant have that.
Same is true for the German Eurofighter.
originally posted by: moebius
The German Air Force intends to keep 46 Tornado IDS of JaBoG 33 in service until at least 2025 to ensure Germany's participation in NATO's nuclear sharing concept.
So it is a not a "non starter" at all.
originally posted by: mightmight
originally posted by: moebius
There is some talk (could be pure speculation) that the primary reason to look for an interim replacement is the NATO nuclear sharing arrangement. Without the Tornados they don't have any platform to carry the B61 nuclear bombs, as the Eurofighter does not have this capability. That is pretty much why they still keep them around.
The idea that the Luftwaffe should purchase a Tornado replacement because of the nuclear capability is a non starter.