It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: SolAquarius
...
I guess what I am getting at is that it intellectually dishonest to just make such a broad statement that the nazis are of the left or socialist like marxist socialist.
Without digging deep into their history and ideology.
Margaret Sanger, "Birth Control and Racial Betterment," Feb 1919.
Published article. Source: Birth Control Review, Feb. 1919. , Library of Congress Microfilm 131:0099B .
Birth Control and Racial Betterment
By Margaret Sanger
Before eugenists and others who are laboring for racial betterment can succeed, they must first clear the way for Birth Control. Like the advocates of Birth Control, the eugenists, for instance, are seeking to assist the race toward the elimination of the unfit. Both are seeking a single end but they lay emphasis upon different methods.
Eugenists emphasize the mating of healthy couples for the conscious purpose of producing healthy children, the sterilization of the unfit to prevent their populating the world with their kind and they may, perhaps, agree with us that contraception is a necessary measure among the masses of the workers, where wages do not keep pace with the growth of the family and its necessities in the way of food, clothing, housing, medical attention, education and the like.
...
...
We maintain that a woman possessing an adequate knowledge of her reproductive functions is the best judge of the time and conditions under which her child should be brought into the world. We further maintain that it is her right, regardless of all other considerations, to determine whether she shall bear children or not, and how many children she shall bear if she chooses to become a mother. To this end we insist that information in regard to scientific contraceptives be made open to all. We believe that if such information is placed within the reach of all, we will have made it possible to take the first, greatest step toward racial betterment and that this step, assisted in no small measure by the educational propaganda of eugenists and members of similar schools, will be taken.
...
...
We who advocate Birth Control, on the other hand, lay all our emphasis upon stopping not only the reproduction of the unfit but upon stopping all reproduction when there is not economic means of providing proper care for those who are born in health. The eugenist also believes that a woman should bear as many healthy children as possible as a duty to the state. We hold that the world is already over-populated. Eugenists imply or insist that a woman's first duty is to the state; we contend that her duty to herself is her duty to the state.
...
He wrote: "The unnatural and increasingly rapid growth of the Feeble-Minded and Insane classes, coupled as it is with a steady restriction among all the thrifty, energetic and superior stocks, constitutes a national and race danger which it is impossible to exaggerate. I am convinced that the multiplication of the Feeble-Minded, which is proceeding now at an artificial rate, unchecked by any of the old restraints of nature, and actually fostered by civilised conditions, is a terrible danger to the race." He called sterilization a "simple surgical operation so the inferior could be permitted freely in the world without causing much inconvenience to others."
Ernst Rüdin (April 19, 1874 in St. Gallen – October 22, 1952) was a Swiss-born German psychiatrist, geneticist, eugenicist and Nazi. Rising to prominence under Emil Kraepelin and assuming his directorship at what is now called the Max Planck Institute of Psychiatry in Munich, he has long been scientifically honoured and cited internationally as the pioneer of psychiatric inheritance studies. He also argued for, designed, justified and funded the mass sterilization and clinical killing of adults and children.
...
Nazi expert
In 1933, Ernst Rüdin, Alfred Ploetz, and several other experts on racial hygiene were brought together to form the Expert Committee on Questions of Population and Racial Policy under Reich Interior Minister Wilhelm Frick. The committee's ideas were used as a scientific basis to justify the racial policy of Nazi Germany and its "Law for the Prevention of Hereditarily Diseased Offspring" was passed by the German government on January 1, 1934. Rüdin was such an avid proponent that colleagues nicknamed him the "Reichsfuhrer for Sterilization"[2][18]
...
originally posted by: ElectricUniverse
a reply to: Gryphon66
So you agree that Winston Churchill, just like Margaret Sanger, and the NAZIs during Hitler's reign were all sadistic and evil?...
So what does that says about those people who to this day still honor people like Margaret Sanger?...
Not to mention. All this evidence corroborates what the op set out to do. "The Big Lie: Exposing the Nazi Roots of the American Left"...
originally posted by: ElectricUniverse
a reply to: Gryphon66
Move goal posts?... Really? so the thread is not about "The Big Lie: Exposing the Nazi Roots of the American Left"?...
Wow...
It seems obvious you don't understand that... NATIONALISM IS NOT INCLUSIVE IN RIGTH-WING IDEOLOGY...
National Socialism is not rightwing because neither socialism, nor nationalism are right-wing... nationalism can be found in left-wing and right-wing countries...
Left-wing regimes like Cuba, the U.S.S.R., China, North Korea, Venezuela, among many others are/were "nationalistic"...
It referred to those who were considered pure "Old Christians", without Muslim or Jewish ancestors, or within the context of the empire (New Spain and Portuguese India) usually to those without ancestry from the Indigenous peoples of the Americas, Asia, or Africa.
originally posted by: tetra50
good thread. However, ever heard of Project Paperclip? And I have personally seen a western civilization history book used in freshman college level courses describing the US as the Fourth Reich.
IMNO, time is circular, meaning it's quite dificult to tell what originally took place, and what's been a "do-over" to make it his story...
But certainly, I don't think politicizing it with left or right is accurate or fair. It's much deeper than that.
originally posted by: Gryphon66
We can't even agree on what the words "right" and "left" mean in this context, so there's no real reason to continue to argue which group is which, is there?