The Big Lie: Exposing the Nazi Roots of the American Left

The members of the separatist groups on the left far outnumber the members of the separatist groups on the right. Soros funds both sides, as well as, the DNC. The Muslim Brotherhood has deep roots in Nazism, as well as, tight connections with people like Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton, Debbie Wasserman-Shultz & Huma Abedin.

The Federal Reserve was established in 1913. Every economic downturn & war was/is caused/created by the Federal Reserve. The establishment of the Federal Reserve is a form of Croni-Capitalism a.k.a. Fascism (corporations controlling government). A Fed member named Prescott Bush even helped fund Hitler's rise to power & the National Socialist (NAZI) agenda. In 1933 our constitution was suspended. This is why we've had continuous wars since 1933 & why we now have unconstitutional laws in place like asset forfeiture, which eliminates our constitutional right to due-process (everyone is now presumed guilty until proven innocent, instead of being presumed innocent until proven guilty). Its also why we have the unconstitutional NDAA (National Defense Authorization Act), which allows the government to imprison people indefinitely without trial. If the wars were ended, the constitution would have to be restored & all the unconstitutional laws/government agencies would be eliminated. In 1971 the US went bankrupt & Richard Nixon took us off the gold standard, with a promise to return to it. The US dollar has lost @ 90% of its value since 1971. It now takes two people's income to support a family instead of just 1, due to increased costs, stagnant wages & the devaluation of the dollar. Every dollar one makes today is worth less tomorrow.

The Military industrial complex, Prison, Pharmaceutical, Agricultural, Insurance, Energy, Technology, Entertainment & Financial industries, along with Mainstream Media & corrupt career politicians form the Deep State/Shadow Governemnt. This is evident by the advertisers on Mainstream Media & the conflict of interest ties between Big Business industries, MSM & corrupt career politicians. Here are some of the conflict of interest ties during Obama's administration

1) ABC News executive producer Ian Cameron is married to Susan Rice, Obama's National Security Adviser.
2) CBS President David Rhodes is the brother of Ben Rhodes, Obama’s Deputy National Security Adviser for Strategic Communications.
3) ABC News correspondent Claire Shipman is married to former Obama Whitehouse Press Secretary Jay Carney.
4) ABC News and Univision reporter Matthew Jaffe is married to Katie Hogan, Obama’s Deputy Press Secretary.
5) ABC President Ben Sherwood is the brother of Obama’s Special Adviser Elizabeth Sherwood.
6) CNN President Virginia Moseley is married to former Hillary Clinton’s Deputy Secretary Tom Nides.

Imo, the only thing worse than Fascism (corporations controlling government), is Communism/Socialism (government controlling corporations). Ideally, we should have a Libertarian government run by "We the People", in accordance with the constitution. This can only be accomplished if people stop voting for career politicians. Political office is a service, not a career.

Fascism (corporations controlling government) a.k.a. Croni-Capitalism has brought us many technological advancements in all industries. If we were under Communism/Socialism (government controlling corporations) for the past 104 years we would all be driving the same model car, use the same model phone, have no computers or internet, etc..

I believe a UBI (Universal Basic Income), if done properly, could make everyone happy. If all welfare programs were ended & Social Security transformed to process UBI payments, instead of paying social security; every person who is over 18, is a US citizen & who does not receive a federal pension; regardless if they are unemployed or not, could receive a yearly income between $20K-$30K per year UBI. This can be done under current tax brackets. It can eliminate the racketeering done by the Croni-Capitalists. The UBI could be used to pay for basic needs like housing, food, health Insurance, education, etc. In a Free-Market. We have not had Free-Market Capitalism since before 1913. With a UBI, minimum wage could be eliminated & there would be no incentive for people to have children in order to receive welfare.

a reply to: enlightenedservant

Heck I am in that group who is doing business over seas, finding markets for stuff I produced or licensed so I know what you are talking about.. Lol

a reply to: enlightenedservant

dude, get rid of that silly avatar

originally posted by: Hyperboles
a reply to: enlightenedservant

dude, get rid of that silly avatar

No. Now what?

originally posted by: enlightenedservant

originally posted by: Hyperboles
a reply to: enlightenedservant

dude, get rid of that silly avatar

No. Now what?

please do not get rid of that avatar, you're fantastic.
please also keep writing. you've been so on point in this thread 👌

so guys, what's the score?
i kinda zoned out for a couple of pages,
did ignoranceisntblisss manage to give us a single example of the way white men are persecuted?
or is it just more of those shadowy nebulous allusions that i can only assume come from the fact that we've got our own stuff going on and sometimes we talk about it on twitter?

a reply to: continuousThunder

originally posted by: muzzleflash

originally posted by: Spider879
a reply to: xuenchen

And we should listen to Dinesh D'Souza because???

You should at least consider all points of view then try to find the truth somewhere inbetween.

True but I also consider the source.. I don't drink clean water out of a dirty glass.

a reply to: xuenchen

The book was titled appropriately: the contents are a big lie. What is the recent vogue on the far right for connecting liberalism with Nazism? They used to call liberals "communists," now they are "Nazis." Were those "decent people" marching with torches chanting "Jews will not replace us" liberals? It is a sad reflection on the state of American politics that as conspicuous a figure as D'Souza has started muddying the waters with this sloppy thinking.

a reply to: enlightenedservant

And? Am I not allowed to have opinions on politics?

Is it because I am a woman ES?

ETA: You presented that like I was trying to speak for others. I was speaking for myself, those are my opinions. But maybe you think women shouldn't be allowed to have and voice opinions?

Is that the kind of person you are? Is that why you were tempted to say something "harsh" to me? Did you want to tell me to go make you a sammich?

a reply to: xuenchen

Another day, another Xuechan left bashing thread. Like sands through the hourglass.

While it's true that operation paperclip was orchestrated by a democratic government, the other evidence is dubious at least, and the all the article does is promote a new book. Ready to cash in Xu???

A smart person would realize this attempt of a book sale is as subtle as a ninja riding an elephant blowing a trumpet. I saw this coming a mile away.

your notion that it was FDR that brought the US out of the Great Depression is a distortion of history

It is reality, only someone extremely partisan and completely subjective could think otherwise.

FDR created the middle class and prosperity in America. He is by far one of the best presidents in our history which is proven by the fact that the American people re-elected him so many times.

a reply to: MotherMayEye

And? Am I not allowed to have opinions on politics?

Is it because I am a woman ES?

ETA: You presented that like I was trying to speak for others. I was speaking for myself, those are my opinions. But maybe you think women shouldn't be allowed to have and voice opinions?

Is that the kind of person you are? Is that why you were tempted to say something "harsh" to me? Did you want to tell me to go make you a sammich?

LOL Wow... So when you can't win an argument, you immediately resort to the "oppressed gender" card? Seriously? My words had nothing to do with your gender, seeing as I've been saying harsh truths to everyone on this forum since I got here. Just look at my earlier posts in this very thread for proof.


And for the record, I don't take anyone's proclaimed gender into account when I'm online because people lie all the time (ever heard of catfishing?). But you just lost every drop of credibility with me for this accusation.

a reply to: MotherMayEye

Did you want to tell me to go make you a sammich?

It's called a sandwich, and here's a fun fact-the Earl of Sandwich did not invent the sandwich, it has Middle Eastern origins. Say 'sammich' but don't spell it like that, slang is beautiful but sometimes it doesn't work on paper.

And Yes you can make me a sandwich, but make sure to stuff it with plenty of Jalapenos,cheese and tomato. I would gladly make you a sandwich but only in real life, a sammich is something you ask for with your tongue, not with a keyboard as some slang sounds sloppy.

In good faith I will recommend a good ingredient to put onto a sandwich-alfalfa sprouts. it's leafy and crunchy. and leafy equates to healthy.

a reply to: MotherMayEye

There was absolutely nothing in his post that degraded women in any way. Your response was waaay out of left field.

a reply to: enlightenedservant

I didn't accuse you. I asked you.

People lie about the color of their skin online too, btw.

Also, I wasn't trying to win any argument with you. I didn't even know we were arguing about something.

If you don't find my opinion credible, I think that's silly. My opinion is as credible as anyone else's.

Or maybe it is that I am a woman with an opinion? Is it? I am ASKING. I still don't know why you take any issue with me having opinions.

a reply to: kaylaluv

That's how all of my comments have been treated, here. I am just playing by the customary rules. If it can be distorted into something ugly, then it will be.

Why should I be the only one having to take that?

originally posted by: MotherMayEye
a reply to: kaylaluv

That's how all of my comments have been treated,
here.

Really? Seems to me like there's just debating going on here. You are upset because some people dont agree with your claim that the Democratic party are a bunch of racists who have fooled African-Americans into voting for them? Surely you don't expect to get no response other than agreement?

a reply to: kaylaluv

Yes, really.

No, to the rest.

a reply to: MotherMayEye

Well, it's good at least that you agree some of us are allowed to disagree with your opinion. Your opinion was a pretty strong statement that was inevitably going to get strong pushback. I saw strong pushback in ES's post, but still didn't see anything that in any way implied your opinion as a woman didn't matter.