It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
You are making yourself look foolish.
originally posted by: Noinden
a reply to: Quadrivium
You don't understand Indo-European cosmology very well do you? You are stuck in the deserts of the middle east
Again. Slowly
Evolution has nothing to do with how life started?
Again, by that reasoning you are also stating that evolution had to have a Creator.
originally posted by: Noinden
a reply to: cooperton
You've never made nucleic acids before have you? They are very simple. Not complex. Their self assembly is simply a chemical function.
Irreducible Complexity is pseudoscience, because it should (to be honest) require a creator to have a creator. He can't "just have happened". Oh wait, hypocrisy is ok is it?
originally posted by: Quadrivium
You are making yourself look foolish.
originally posted by: Noinden
a reply to: Quadrivium
You don't understand Indo-European cosmology very well do you? You are stuck in the deserts of the middle east
Again. Slowly
Evolution has nothing to do with how life started?
By your reasoning above you are stating that all classes were CREATED at the same moment.
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
a reply to: Noinden
You and I both know they would go to a hospital without a second thought trusting that the medicine, surgery, or procedure they are they for will work for them.
It's just easier to obfuscate the issue while healthy then seek the medicine developed with the theory they are discounting when they need it.
originally posted by: Noinden
a reply to: Quadrivium
No, because evolution does not deal with creation.
ditto
It could have creators, a creator, or not. It is of no importance. Evolution is the changing of life. NOT the start there of.
SO your reasoning is faulty.
Nucleic acids do what they do, because of a physical property. That does not imply your God in any way shape of form. IF it did, he should have done a better job with RNA (which is unstable) and DNA (which is still not that stable).
originally posted by: Noinden
a reply to: cooperton
You really do not understand modern medical science if you believe "Not one medical treatment is reliant on the validity of evolution." One of the banes of medical science is antibiotic resistance, which is bacterium having evolved to resist antibiotics.
Summary The basic conclusion of this research is that conventional radioisotopic dating methods are unreliable. The chief reason is that uniformitarianism is not a legitimate model of earth history. Observational evidence supports the recent occurrence of a global catastrophic Flood. Because the earth has suffered a major tectonic catastrophe corresponding to the Genesis Flood, the uniformitarian assumptions that are applied to obtain age estimates from radioisotopic data are simply not true. Intermediate results from RATE support a young-earth, catastrophic, creationist model.