It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: EternalShadow
originally posted by: NowanKenubi
I have a question: is it to the discretion of the police to take or not fingerprints following an arrest, or if it is something that is always done? Or does it depend on the reason for arresting someone? Thank you to the member who will tell me.
Why would any member give you SUPPORT to keep illegal immigrants safe from the preestablished laws!!!???
You want the "inside track" to evade discovery??
originally posted by: 3daysgone
I found this. I don't even want to guess if it reliable or not, but if it is true Trump will get a win either way.
REPUBLICANS TELL DEMOCRATS: 'WE'LL GIVE YOU DACA IF YOU FUND TRUMP'S BORDER WALL'
originally posted by: DerBeobachter
To be honest, how ridicolous is this?
Aren´t ALL of the citizens of the allegedly former united states, except the native americans, dreamers???
Or were your ancestors invited to occupy the americas?
So some of the modern descendants of illegal immigrants would have deported their own ancestors?
And would have to deport themselves now, to be taken serious?
But who would take such people back?
Trump wouldn´t be welcome in Germany, never ever.
Just by the minority of the rightwing AfD and NPD supporters maybe, and some rightwing people in bavaria.
But not by the real germans!
originally posted by: 3daysgone
Well then the federal government should cut off any and all federal aid to New York. If they will not abide by federal law they should not get federal aid.
That's something that's being openly discussed now, correspondents to the BBC and SKY last night were talking about the possibility of the, 'scratch-my-back' scenario.
Thing is Trump's call to legalise DACA is not necessary, as it was a discretionary immigration EO, just as was the Nazi criminal immigration after WW2.
It's a disgrace now that congress wants to do deals in this manner, and also what's going to happen to the 'useful' discretionary immigration convention if say DACA is legalised?
Please cite the federal law that requires cities to fingerprint all arrestees. I'm waiting. Oh? You say there isn't any such law?
originally posted by: defiythelie
a reply to: Krakatoa
Blah blah blah. It is not the job of a state, county, city, town, Township or village to enforce federal law. In fact they don't have the athority to do so, that rest squarely on the shoulders of the federal government.
All well and good, but the original post was about Chicago, whichalthough it may want to be, is not a part of NY.
originally posted by: xuenchen
oh my word !!
New York State law requires, with some limited exceptions, that the police take one’s fingerprints when one is arrested for (1) a felony; (2) a misdemeanor defined in the New York State Penal Law; (3) a misdemeanor defined outside the New York State Penal Law if the misdemeanor would be a felony because the individual has a prior criminal conviction (For example, a first time DWI is a misdemeanor found in the Vehicle and Traffic Law – not the Penal Law – and therefore one arrested for a DWI is not subject to mandatory fingerprinting