Proof that investigating Trump is starting to backfire for Democrats

originally posted by: conscientiousobserver
a reply to: Templeton

So you oppose taking the money from the rich that they earned off the sweat of our backs and putting it towards better education and healthcare for all? Which would in turn would create more innovation, jobs, and tax revenue? Ya know Kansas tried proving that trickle down worked by cutting taxes for everyone especially the rich and they are now one of our poorest states.

Generally when You guys say RICH it generally mean people whom have more than "ME".

When you have to make a thread proclaiming something to help convince yourself its true, it isn't.

a reply to: jkm1864

Generally we mean everybody should pay their fair share. It's not a coincidence that this country was extremely prosperous when millionaires had a 50% tax rate. Now through loop holes many of them have a lower tax rate than your average worker. Who if it weren't for the average worker making and buying these products they wouldn't have that much money to begin with.

originally posted by: Wayfarer

When you have to make a thread proclaiming something to help convince yourself its true, it isn't.

guess you didn't read the disclaimer "NOTE: HAD TO USE THE TITLE BECAUSE THATS THE WAY IT IS POSTED, NONE OF THIS IS PROOF IMO"

Reading comprehension skills are important to be able to discuss a subject,

a reply to: RickinVa

Nancy Pelosi shows some (brief) common sense, when she said that voters are becoming sick of Democrats criticizing the President of their United States at every turn.

www.sott.net...

originally posted by: conscientiousobserver
a reply to: Templeton

So you oppose taking the money from the rich that they earned off the sweat of our backs and putting it towards better education and healthcare for all? Which would in turn would create more innovation, jobs, and tax revenue? Ya know Kansas tried proving that trickle down worked by cutting taxes for everyone especially the rich and they are now one of our poorest states.

This issue is internal to the DNC and I'm not a member. They obviously didn't want Bernie to lead then, and Clinton says as much in her new book now. It's up to them if they move forward as a constitution loving progressive left or as an incompatible crazy socialist left.

Are you really pointing out the outcome of Kansas in defense of socialism? How many died there again. Venezuela is happening now.

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: Aegeus

Out of all the people in the past 50 years, no one has been as scrutinized, poked and prodded and investigated as Donald Trump has been.

The source for this claim? You have statistics to back this claim?

Tell me, has anyone asked for his birth certificate?

Only people with sketchy pasts whose birth certificates are obviously not original and are pasted together with adobe get that...

People with no past...no history...no reason to be a politician...who purposefully destroy the country with the claims of unity who did all he could to lie to the public and who are backed by all liberals and corporations to fleece the public.

Of course one investigation for you equates to the thousands of vilification from all sides is equal in karma.

Your scientific method shows how it really works...all based on left-brain emotion...disconnected from the heart.

The very fact that this is a Russia investigation with no Russian in it is suspect it is a farce whose purpose is to launder money from tax payers. Mueller and his team are each paid millions a year, and they are not even doing their jobs right.

www.nbcnews.com...

a reply to: Templeton
Clinton tries to blame everybody but herself for losing in her new book.
They didn't want him to lead the dnc Because he would have fought the corruption in both parties and would have actually accomplished something on that front. Unlike the current white house resident.

really though? What is so crazy about putting our tax money towards our education and health care. As opposed to blowing up other countries?

My point about Kansaswas not necessarily meant to defend socialism but to show that trickle down economics through tax cuts does not work and never will. Also i think it may be safe to assume that some people may have died due to inadequate healthcare in Kansas.
There are many forms of socialism and
Venezuela is yet another example of a dictatorship hiding under the veil of socialism. I.e. socialism from above which is more communism than anything and adding in corruption and mismanagement only brought about disaster.
What we need is socialism from below or in other words a system that is meant to benefit everyone and doesn't give power to anyone individual or elite group. we are already a democratic socialist country and are just a few steps away from having a version of true socialism from below.
Where the rich (innovators and/ or job creators) can still be rich but the less fortunate get the same opportunities as the rich to create new industries and avenues of income. What we need is a healthy mix of capitalism, democracy, and socialism. Not constant bickering about how greed is ruining people's lives but doing nothing about it.

a reply to: tulermank

Um Felix sater and Putin himself? Not to mention it would help if all those Russian officials would quit having all those "unfortunate " accidents and sudden deaths.

a reply to: kelbtalfenek

unfortunately it wouldn't be anything that would benefit the average citizen.

a reply to: Jiggly

considering he doesn't use email and insists on face to face meetings. It is not do easy getting direct evidence That can actually lead to prosecution. Regardless of that though the Steele dossier was meant to be the information that burned him. Which more and more of the document seems to be legit. Better late than never i guess.

a reply to: RazorV66

He isn't exactly an angel when it comes to his taxes

originally posted by: RickinVa

Trump goes to jail, Clinton goes to jail, Pence becomes president.....it's a win/win/lose for everybody and both sides will be happy

LOL ! So true...yet so unfortunately sad that politics has been reduced to how a person lives vicariously through the wins / losses of "their side" as a means to bolster their self image.

Sad actually.

In other words it's a glorified cock fight.

You don't bet on one cock winning and the other losing because you actually care which one wins. You bet because you want to be right about something.

It makes you feel powerful. Like you're a smart guy. Like all those people who bet on the other cock are idiots, and you're sure glad you're not them. (Until your cock loses, of course.)


People didn't vote in GW Bush because they thought he would be a good president. They had to know he would suck at it. They voted him in because he was a dumb guy, and they wanted to see a dumb guy win. To show that dumb people can win.

Next we voted in a black guy. To show that black people can win.

Now we've voted in a real estate salesman with a toupee. To show that real estate salesmen with toupee's can win, I guess?

Point is, our choices are getting better and better. First we vote disability (Idiot Bush). Second we vote arbitrary trait that tells you nothing whatsoever about a person (a person's race).

But now we're starting to focus more on..... um I'm not sure what we're focusing on.

a reply to: bloodymarvelous

Awesome hair?
A beautiful tan? Beautiful.

originally posted by: jkm1864

originally posted by: conscientiousobserver
a reply to: Templeton

So you oppose taking the money from the rich that they earned off the sweat of our backs and putting it towards better education and healthcare for all? Which would in turn would create more innovation, jobs, and tax revenue? Ya know Kansas tried proving that trickle down worked by cutting taxes for everyone especially the rich and they are now one of our poorest states.

Generally when You guys say RICH it generally mean people whom have more than "ME".

"Mandela Effect" has money?

No wonder people keep posting about it.