Liberal Fem Wants Elderly And Dementia Patients Euthanized

a reply to: silo13

Woops.
Had to dash off and deal with something just as I posted.

Logans run was a classic and I think everyone fell in love with Jessica six... I did anyway.(That was in the movie version).

As for euthanasia. Its a hard one to tackle. I can see both sides but I end up worrying that it'll end up being a slippery slope if its ever legalised generally.
Like the suicide boothes in Futurama.
One wrong decision in the wrong mood and you can't go back.

originally posted by: TerryMcGuire
a reply to: seeker1963

She was Jenny Agutter

I must be thinking of something different. I remember her being blonde. Ahhhh, her name was Amanda Wyss. You're right! Different show I guess.

Sorry OP, didn't mean to go off topic.

a reply to: scraedtosleep

Thanks - I fixed it.

peace

You may want to research the person you're trying to pigeon hole before you grab some sensationalist, click bait that acuses some one of being a "liberal feminist".

Kate Hopkins may be many things, including a racist, bigot, xenophobic cretin but I doubt she would ever be called a liberal feminist by anyone who actually has heard of her.

By the way, your click bait has been pulled down. Might want to try another clickbait source for this poor excuse for a humans vitriol.

Wait a minute, wait a minute, I'm not into the fringe writers/fringe activists and s#, but this one is familiar -- self-identified feminists and alt party folks I know practically spit venom when her name comes up.

I have little to go on since I'm not familiar with her beyond that, but really I don't think this person is who the OP wants to label her as because those who should theoretically be "kin" in ideology hate her.

She should be thankful we're not euthanizing morons, or she'd be the first to go.

originally posted by: silo13
a reply to: scraedtosleep

Thanks - I fixed it.

peace

Let's see here. You didn't fix your erroneous title or correct the disinfo in your OP — you fixed the link to the fake news blog?

a reply to: silo13

Yep, you're drop dead correct (no pun intended); the Leftist Democrat promotion of the culture of death. How does that old Jewish saying go.......first they came for the something and I said nothing, then they came for me and there wasn't anyone left to say anything? First, abortion, Then Late Term abortion, then I've seen they're advocating post-birth abortion up to 6 months and now...........Euthanasia, volontary and then Euthanasia.......MANDATORY!

originally posted by: theantediluvian

originally posted by: silo13
a reply to: scraedtosleep

Thanks - I fixed it.

peace

Let's see here. You didn't fix your erroneous title or correct the disinfo in your OP — you fixed the link to the fake news blog?

Not the first time this has happened with this particular poster, unfortunately.

originally posted by: Ohanka
Katie Hopkins is an interesting character.

Not a feminist though. Which admittedly is one of the few redeeming things about her.

She makes a living saying outlandish things.

Yeah, she's always "accidentally" getting in trouble for her views.

Putting her aside, though, its interesting to see the way other journalists relish the opportunity of getting a good hit piece in.
Kind of exposes their own hatred and gives them an excuse to vent.

But I have to laugh at her being called liberal. Best way to insult her.

a reply to: silo13

What a Nazi.

Amazed at how many people started the "all liberals should be euthanized... by a bullet," post

Lol hypocrites

originally posted by: theantediluvian
a reply to: IgnoranceIsntBlisss

Funny, the woman saying it is clearly a right-wing hate monger. And the comments in this thread look like this:

originally posted by: Jiggly
all liberals should be euthanized... with a bullet

But yeah, let's talk about the misguided views of people a hundred years ago. BTW, it wasn't just the Progressives of the time who were espousing eugenics. Another popular position with those in the Progressive Era was prohibition. Who favors prohibition now? Which "side" is running around pushing anti-immigration "reports" from CIS and FAIR, groups founded by a living eugenicist, John Tanton? Context is important.

There you go spinning this purely in left roght terms again.

Eugenics IS Classical Progressivism.

My sentence was accurate. Whether it fits here, well i only have phone access right now so only commented on the framing and the content not trying to dig into innane details with this tecj. You can all duke it out with dripping binary logic all you want. But her words were syraight out of eugenics 101.

Social engineering is social darwinism 202, and thats all your team. So have fun with that LOL.

I call out asshattery no matter whose doing it. If only youd abandon the dark side (which is both sides) and do the same.

Perhaps you should do a primer for all of us to differentiate liberalism from democratism from progressivism from socialism from communism. Ie advanced theory stuff that helps people understanddsuch ordeal, opposed to only ever doing standardized inflamatory news cycle stuff



But anyways, eugenics never truly went away, and its raging in VIOLENTLY just under the surface of your teams entire "social justice" charade (although the liberal bewildered herd mostly doesnt realize what theyve been socially engineered for), and its new name is TRANShumanism. Which ill be documentary'ing very soon...

a reply to: kaylaluv

Let's see here. You didn't fix your erroneous title or correct the disinfo in your OP — you fixed the link to the fake news blog?

The title and information comes from the article.

Don't shoot the messenger.

I'm not old enough yet, lol.

peace

originally posted by: seeker1963

originally posted by: Junkheap
Why stop there.

Kill anyone over thirty. Just throw 'em into a carousel on their birthday and watch 'em explode.

Been trying to think of the name of that TV show for weeks! Can you help me out?

Logans RUN, it was a movie before it was a lame TV show

In other news, if the afflicted themselves desire assisted suicide it should be their right.

Just another version of "Logan's Run".

originally posted by: GAOTU789
You may want to research the person you're trying to pigeon hole before you grab some sensationalist, click bait that acuses some one of being a "liberal feminist".
Why - it will not change my opinion.

Kate Hopkins may be many things, including a racist, bigot, xenophobic cretin but I doubt she would ever be called a liberal feminist by anyone who actually has heard of her.

By the way, your click bait has been pulled down. Might want to try another clickbait source for this poor excuse for a humans vitriol.

What click-bait? I fixed the link.
There's nothing in this section of threads that I know of that doesn't allow blogs - so you're going to remove my thread or link because you don't like it?

Wow.

peace

a reply to: theantediluvian

As much as it pains me, sometimes I have to agree with you when you speak truths. She isn't a Liberal. She seems to spout extreme positions on things and also seems to be an attention whore.

originally posted by: Nyiah
Wait a minute, wait a minute, I'm not into the fringe writers/fringe activists and s#, but this one is familiar -- self-identified feminists and alt party folks I know practically spit venom when her name comes up.

I have little to go on since I'm not familiar with her beyond that, but really I don't think this person is who the OP wants to label her as because those who should theoretically be "kin" in ideology hate her.

Did I write the article? No.

Whether she is or is not a feminist? I could care less. It's the articles title, not mine.

Why is everyone getting their panties in such a twist, lol.

Why not we try to stay on track - which is the subject of legalizing euthanasia.

peace