It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: kelbtalfenek
a reply to: nwtrucker
So Trump has 0 respect for a Federal Judges lawful order...That's just Trump for you.
originally posted by: kelbtalfenek
a reply to: nwtrucker
So Trump has 0 respect for a Federal Judges lawful order...That's just Trump for you.
originally posted by: kelbtalfenek
a reply to: nwtrucker
So Trump has 0 respect for a Federal Judges lawful order...That's just Trump for you.
originally posted by: kurthall
a reply to: nwtrucker
You really think that???...here, let trump call this fake news. Then when you are done, call it fake all you would like, even if its exaggerated, they are still the worst number for any president at this point in time. Just wondering, how many of the trumps supporters have offered to wash his feet? Big surprise he pardoned him...LOL, I guess the alt left did not see that coming.
www.yahoo.com...
originally posted by: FyreByrd
I think you have it wrong - Arpao was in contempt of court - actually defying court orders to to stop enforcing an unconstitutional law.
So a law enforcement officer has pardoned for ignoring a lawful order from the courts to cease racial profiling.
So if law enforcement officers don't obey legally binding orders - just how is that a good thing.
Not to mention that the 'pardon' is highly irregular in that, among other things, it happened before sentencing. Therefore the 'the man has served and is 80' rationale is not valid as the sentencing judge may not have sentenced him to jail time for those or other reasons as was his right.
This administration just made a statement that the 'rule of law' is not to be respected when it comes to presidential cronies.
originally posted by: FyreByrd
I think you have it wrong - Arpao was in contempt of court - actually defying court orders to to stop enforcing an unconstitutional law.
So a law enforcement officer has pardoned for ignoring a lawful order from the courts to cease racial profiling.
So if law enforcement officers don't obey legally binding orders - just how is that a good thing.
Not to mention that the 'pardon' is highly irregular in that, among other things, it happened before sentencing. Therefore the 'the man has served and is 80' rationale is not valid as the sentencing judge may not have sentenced him to jail time for those or other reasons as was his right.
This administration just made a statement that the 'rule of law' is not to be respected when it comes to presidential cronies.
originally posted by: incoserv
originally posted by: kelbtalfenek
a reply to: nwtrucker
So Trump has 0 respect for a Federal Judges lawful order...That's just Trump for you.
So, the federal judge had 0 respect for Federal Law. That's a progressive brain-rot moron for you.
Over Arpaio’s 24-year tenure as sheriff of Maricopa county, he gained notoriety for detaining hundreds of undocumented immigrants in a Tent City jail and forcing them to wear pink underwear.
The sheriff courted controversy and media attention – calling his own jail a “concentration camp”, serving inmates just two meals a day and selling replica pink underwear to the public – as he became a national figurehead for the virulent xenophobia that Trump embraced in his presidential campaign.
originally posted by: pavil
Good pardon. He deserves it plus it will enrage the left. Win, Win IMO.