It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Wait, so you actually believe kicking a canister that a Leo just shot at you is legitimately equal to holding a gun to his head and making demands during a hostage situation?
Because that's what charge would be levied if you held a gun to a Leo's head - aggravated assault of a leo. He was facing a direct threat to his life in that situation.
If that threatens someone's life - why are police shooting canisters at people to begin with?
originally posted by: Montana
a reply to: Shamrock6
Are they? Hmmmm
What happens when every action becomes a felony?
What happened to the boy who cried wolf? People stopped listening, it became just one more source of noise. Keep severe charges and punishments for severe crimes.
What happens when every action becomes a felony?
Keep severe charges and punishments for severe crimes.
originally posted by: Montana
Kind of a shame to see *these* LEOs have become snowflakes as well...
I wasn't making a strawman
you are totally 100% on one side of the issue here.
I didn't say you said those things,
I was asking if you believed things like that or (if you so choose), you could elaborate and explain why you don't agree with those things or if you only partially agree, etc.
originally posted by: muzzleflash
I'm a Constitutionalist - that's why I am legitimately attacking this.
And I feel very sorry for the kid, the overbearing out of control insane government just dropped the heavy hammer on him over a very minor infraction simply to placate the anger of one political side.
originally posted by: Shamrock6
a reply to: muzzleflash
You seem to have a pretty poor grasp of what constitutes assault and what doesn't, along with a poor grasp of what I'm actually saying versus what you think I must really mean.
originally posted by: DJMSN
a reply to: muzzleflash
The guy also brought this on his self in more ways than one. First off for kicking the gas canister and second FOR GOING ON LINE AND BRAGGING ABOUT IT.
That can be used against him so now they basically have a confession now. One day people will learn to not live life online. I imagine this guy will get an ACLU lawyer and charges will be dismissed.
originally posted by: queenofswords
When protestors turn from protesting to physical acts against law enforcement, they are no longer protestors but agitators and rioters. The rules change, and our law enforcement officers must be protected.
When you start overlooking acts such as this one, you might as well let chaos reign supreme, because one small act of violence overlooked will just escalate on to bigger acts.
Nip it in the bud. That's what had to happen.
originally posted by: Blaine91555
originally posted by: muzzleflash
I'm a Constitutionalist - that's why I am legitimately attacking this.
And I feel very sorry for the kid, the overbearing out of control insane government just dropped the heavy hammer on him over a very minor infraction simply to placate the anger of one political side.
Then you believe that only peaceful assembly is protected.
How do you know in advance how heavy the hammer will be? You seem to be jumping the gun here.
originally posted by: muzzleflash
a reply to: Shamrock6
Wait, so you actually believe kicking a canister that a Leo just shot at you is legitimately equal to holding a gun to his head and making demands during a hostage situation?
Because that's what charge would be levied if you held a gun to a Leo's head - aggravated assault of a leo.
He was facing a direct threat to his life in that situation.
But kicking a canister?
If that threatens someone's life - why are police shooting canisters at people to begin with?