It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Flat earth theory?

page: 121
14
<< 118  119  120    122  123  124 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jul, 27 2019 @ 03:39 AM
link   

originally posted by: Out6of9Balance
a reply to: Akragon

Different people are living different realities.


but all are the same illusion of the one



posted on Jul, 27 2019 @ 03:45 AM
link   
If they are really 'tracking' all these 'satellites', which are in Earth 'orbit', they would've tracked them when they launched, and when they flew towards orbit, too.


They'd have mentioned where they can be seen, from Earth, going up towards orbit.


They never mentioned where we could see them fly up towards orbit, which shows it's pure nonsense.



posted on Jul, 27 2019 @ 04:06 AM
link   

originally posted by: ManFromEurope

How about you prove this claim of „never been seen“!

Literally dozens of members tried to explain orbital mechanics to you, why a rocket has to reach 28,000 km/h SIDEWAYS to reach and stay in orbit, yet you claim it can not happen.

That’s a feeling you have, not a proven claim.


You are feeling that a rocket actually flies into Earth 'orbit', while never once seen, or filmed, from Earth, going up towards 'orbit'!

It seems blatantly obvious that if a rocket flew up towards 'orbit', we'd be able to see it, and film it, from Earth, going up towards 'orbit', right?

This would prove rockets really DO go into 'orbit', so when they can't show a video to prove they go into 'orbit', it is clearly faked. Period.



posted on Jul, 27 2019 @ 04:26 AM
link   
NASA was happy to mention where we could see the ISS in orbit, while they never once said where we could see the ISS when it was first going up towards orbit, and you don't think it's the least bit fishy?



posted on Jul, 27 2019 @ 05:14 AM
link   
Simply showing us a rocket going upward into 'orbit', from seeing it on Earth, and in videos, would prove their claim is true, or cannot be disputed as faked, for sure.

But they never say where we can observe a rocket, going towards orbit, and no videos show it, either. The only reason for NOT proving their claim is true, is because it is NOT true. No other reason.



posted on Jul, 27 2019 @ 06:32 AM
link   

originally posted by: turbonium1
Simply showing us a rocket going upward into 'orbit', from seeing it on Earth, and in videos, would prove their claim is true, or cannot be disputed as faked, for sure.

But they never say where we can observe a rocket, going towards orbit, and no videos show it, either. The only reason for NOT proving their claim is true, is because it is NOT true. No other reason.


Sad to see you post blatant BS while you ignore the end result of rocket launches. The international space station visible to the unaided eye. The Hubble space telescope. Satellite TV. Satellite TV. Satellite internet. Satellite phones. Weather Satellites. The accounts by scores of people that have been to space. A mission that landed a probe on a comet and returned a sample. The Mars rovers. GPS satellites. Voyager one and two. Viking one and two. China’s and Japan’s moon mapping and survey missions.



posted on Jul, 27 2019 @ 06:37 AM
link   
a reply to: turbonium1

If Russia’s launch of Sputnik 1 was a falsehood, why didn’t the USA call Russia out? During the start of the Cold War?

The right out lies and delusions you puke out are very alarming. It’s no because you question. It’s because of the preponderance of natural and physical evidence you ignore the shows flat earth is a blatant lie.



posted on Jul, 27 2019 @ 06:48 AM
link   

originally posted by: neutronflux

originally posted by: turbonium1
Simply showing us a rocket going upward into 'orbit', from seeing it on Earth, and in videos, would prove their claim is true, or cannot be disputed as faked, for sure.

But they never say where we can observe a rocket, going towards orbit, and no videos show it, either. The only reason for NOT proving their claim is true, is because it is NOT true. No other reason.


Sad to see you post blatant BS while you ignore the end result of rocket launches. The international space station visible to the unaided eye. The Hubble space telescope. Satellite TV. Satellite TV. Satellite internet. Satellite phones. Weather Satellites. The accounts by scores of people that have been to space. A mission that landed a probe on a comet and returned a sample. The Mars rovers. GPS satellites. Voyager one and two. Viking one and two. China’s and Japan’s moon mapping and survey missions.


The end result? Are you serious?

That's like proving a time machine with pictures showing you in 16th century Europe!!


That's also an 'end result', so I assume it's good enough to convince you it's a real time machine ? No?


Why not?

Because the 'end result' proves nothing.

Hiding the part which would prove it, shows it is a fake.

So when you demand to see his time machine work in front of you, or a rocket going up towards orbit, by seeing it, they refuse to show it to you, and that's why you know it is a fake time machine, and a fake flight into 'orbit', as well.


Can you not understand what I'm saying here?



posted on Jul, 27 2019 @ 06:58 AM
link   

originally posted by: turbonium1

originally posted by: neutronflux

originally posted by: turbonium1
Simply showing us a rocket going upward into 'orbit', from seeing it on Earth, and in videos, would prove their claim is true, or cannot be disputed as faked, for sure.

But they never say where we can observe a rocket, going towards orbit, and no videos show it, either. The only reason for NOT proving their claim is true, is because it is NOT true. No other reason.


Sad to see you post blatant BS while you ignore the end result of rocket launches. The international space station visible to the unaided eye. The Hubble space telescope. Satellite TV. Satellite TV. Satellite internet. Satellite phones. Weather Satellites. The accounts by scores of people that have been to space. A mission that landed a probe on a comet and returned a sample. The Mars rovers. GPS satellites. Voyager one and two. Viking one and two. China’s and Japan’s moon mapping and survey missions.


The end result? Are you serious?

That's like proving a time machine with pictures showing you in 16th century Europe!!


That's also an 'end result', so I assume it's good enough to convince you it's a real time machine ? No?


Why not?

Because the 'end result' proves nothing.

Hiding the part which would prove it, shows it is a fake.

So when you demand to see his time machine work in front of you, or a rocket going up towards orbit, by seeing it, they refuse to show it to you, and that's why you know it is a fake time machine, and a fake flight into 'orbit', as well.


Can you not understand what I'm saying here?


Your such a delusional person.

Again...

If Russia’s launch of Sputnik 1 was a falsehood, why didn’t the USA call Russia out? During the start of the Cold War?

The right out lies and delusions you puke out are very alarming. It’s no because you question. It’s because of the preponderance of natural and physical evidence you ignore the shows flat earth is a blatant lie.

Sputnik tracked from earth by its broadcast.



posted on Jul, 27 2019 @ 07:01 AM
link   
a reply to: turbonium1

By the why. From Sydney Australia, where would you look to see the north start Polars?

Flat earth doesn’t even explain the most basic observable astrological phenomena as seen from earth.
edit on 27-7-2019 by neutronflux because: Added and fixed



posted on Jul, 28 2019 @ 02:26 AM
link   

originally posted by: neutronflux
If Russia’s launch of Sputnik 1 was a falsehood, why didn’t the USA call Russia out? During the start of the Cold War?

Sputnik tracked from earth by its broadcast.


Same old argument, is it? A fake would be exposed by the arch enemy, and they didn't expose it, so it must be true!!

If they both agreed to fake it, and not expose the other side's fakes, would that finally bury this dead horse argument, once and for all, as pure speculation, and nothing more?

When you have nothing left but the old 'Arch-enemy would expose it' argument, you don't have anything at all.


This illusion doesn't hold up if you see they never tell us where a rocket can be seen on Earth, actually doing what they claim it does - flying up towards orbit. That's absolutely ridiculous. It shows how fakes work, if you don't look close enough at what they are doing here. A rocket flies out of sight, wasting fuel as it flies below cruising altitudes of planes, flown by planes to SAVE fuel!! So far, that's pretty convincing, is it not? A rocket flying to the moon wastes it's most precious resource, fuel, by veering off, far below planes at cruising altitudes!

Then, the rocket flies out, at higher resistance altitudes, wasting even MORE fuel, and it soon disappears from view, over the ocean, at the same altitudes....

It's an illusion from there, that's how it works so well.

'These idiots don't even care where the rocket can be seen after it goes over the ocean!'

An illusionist with his black curtain, has nothing to hide either! It's just a curtain, nothing wrong with that, is there?


A rocket goes out of view, the ocean is used like the magician's black curtain.

Would the magician allow you to look, and film, behind his black curtain? Probably not, right?

NASA doesn't tell you where to see the rocket after it disappears over the ocean, either.


Use your brain, for once.



posted on Jul, 28 2019 @ 02:37 AM
link   
a reply to: turbonium1


Use your brain, for once.


Says the flat-earther.

LOL



posted on Jul, 28 2019 @ 02:41 AM
link   

originally posted by: neutronflux
a reply to: turbonium1

By the why. From Sydney Australia, where would you look to see the north start Polars?

Flat earth doesn’t even explain the most basic observable astrological phenomena as seen from earth.


You don't understand how a flat surface doesn't equate to having an infinite view of all objects above it.

You obviously believe the north star is trillions of miles away, which is utter nonsense to begin with. Stars are about 6000 miles above Earth, or so, which makes the north star impossible to see from Sydney. It is far too low, to be seen from all points on the Earth's surface. Just like a plane cannot be seen from a far distance, at a low altitude, but can be seen at the same distance, at a higher altitude. You may need to use magnification to see the plane at higher altitude, because it's too small to see by eye.


That's easy to demonstrate if you don't believe me, But I'm sure you aren't claiming that a flat surface - of immense size - has infinite view of objects above it, no matter how low those objects are, above the surface - right? That would be pretty stupid, wouldn't it?



posted on Jul, 28 2019 @ 02:43 AM
link   
a reply to: turbonium1


That would be pretty stupid, wouldn't it?


Pretty much sums up anyone who believe the earth is flat.

LOL



posted on Jul, 28 2019 @ 02:46 AM
link   

originally posted by: TerryDon79
a reply to: turbonium1


Use your brain, for once.


Says the flat-earther.

LOL


Says the guy who thinks NASA didn't need to show a rocket flying towards orbit, from Earth, because we see it fly over the ocean 10.000 feet below airplane altitudes, and vanish from sight!

A fine example of using one's brain, indeed!



posted on Jul, 28 2019 @ 02:52 AM
link   
a reply to: turbonium1

Awwww.

Poor flat-earther need a safe space?

You know this thread is in this forum because flat-earth is a literal joke, right?



posted on Jul, 28 2019 @ 03:53 AM
link   

originally posted by: TerryDon79
a reply to: turbonium1

Awwww.

Poor flat-earther need a safe space?

You know this thread is in this forum because flat-earth is a literal joke, right?


No, whoever runs this forum put it here, for no valid reason, when time travelling monsters and alien abductions are not put here. I guess you think time travelling monsters are a valid argument, since it's not in this thread.

The real joke is to believe Earth is a ball, flying through space, so it still fits in this forum, at that!



posted on Jul, 28 2019 @ 03:58 AM
link   
a reply to: turbonium1


for no valid reason


Suuuuuuuuuuuuuuure. No valid reason.

Oh wait!

It’s because the earth isn’t flat and it’s a joke.

LOL



posted on Jul, 28 2019 @ 04:04 AM
link   
Another display of ignorance, well done.



posted on Jul, 28 2019 @ 04:05 AM
link   

originally posted by: turbonium1
Another display of ignorance, well done.


Irony of a flat-earther.

LOL



new topics

top topics



 
14
<< 118  119  120    122  123  124 >>

log in

join