It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Flat earth theory?

page: 105
14
<< 102  103  104    106  107  108 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jun, 2 2019 @ 02:49 AM
link   
a reply to: turbonium1

Will your head explode when you realize gravity is real, man made objects orbiting the earth are real while providing vital services that verify their existence, and flat earth is a blatant lie?



posted on Jun, 2 2019 @ 03:43 AM
link   

originally posted by: neutronflux

Because the speed at which the moon is traveling forward counter acts the gravitation pull of the earth .


That's nonsense. If Earth's 'gravity' pulled on the moon, it would certainly pull in any astronauts closer to the Earth, as well. But they all 'float' in 0 g space, or near 0 g, supposedly!

Nice try.



posted on Jun, 2 2019 @ 04:00 AM
link   
You don't have any proof satellites and the ISS are in 'space', so don't try asking me to prove they are NOT in space, because you have the burden of proving your claim, not the reverse.


How does a light moving across the sky prove it must be the ISS, flying around Earth? It's nonsense.

We have real proof of the flat Earth, right here, which anyone can verify, being the instruments on airplanes prove it, every single day, thousands of times a day, and you point to a light moving across the sky, which cannot be seen, in detail, the altitude cannot be verified, and it's 'proof' to you!!


The fantasy is better than admitting there's actual proof against it!



posted on Jun, 2 2019 @ 04:06 AM
link   
Still no comment about the video clips, for some reason....



posted on Jun, 2 2019 @ 05:16 AM
link   

originally posted by: turbonium1

originally posted by: neutronflux

Because the speed at which the moon is traveling forward counter acts the gravitation pull of the earth .


That's nonsense. If Earth's 'gravity' pulled on the moon, it would certainly pull in any astronauts closer to the Earth, as well. But they all 'float' in 0 g space, or near 0 g, supposedly!

Nice try.


NO... no they don't float...

For the 10th time...


And IF you think gravity isn't real, and offers no resistance... hold your arms straight out in front of your for an extended period of time

according to your ridiculous ideas... you should have no issues holding them up for hours


edit on 2-6-2019 by Akragon because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 2 2019 @ 05:47 AM
link   

originally posted by: turbonium1

originally posted by: neutronflux

Because the speed at which the moon is traveling forward counter acts the gravitation pull of the earth .


That's nonsense. If Earth's 'gravity' pulled on the moon, it would certainly pull in any astronauts closer to the Earth, as well. But they all 'float' in 0 g space, or near 0 g, supposedly!

Nice try.


Nice bit of intellectual dishonesty.

You missed this agreement...

What you are ignoring is the velocities the bodies are circling the earth.



What causes an orbit to happen?

www.qrg.northwestern.edu...

Orbits are the result of a perfect balance between the forward motion of a body in space, such as a planet or moon, and the pull of gravity on it from another body in space, such as a large planet or star. An object with a lot of mass goes forward and wants to keep going forward; however, the gravity of another body in space pulls it in. There is a continuous tug-of-war between the one object wanting to go forward and away and the other wanting to pull it in.


The astronauts in the International space station seem weightless because they are “falling” around the earth at the same rate as the international space station.

Long explanation linked to below if you want to try and find falsehoods.



WHY DO ASTRONAUTS FLOAT AROUND IN SPACE?
www.wired.com...


And the argument the quote was taken from, and it’s context,

You


How does 'gravity' hold a moon supposedly 1/4 million miles away in place,


Because the speed at which the moon is traveling forward counter acts the gravitation pull of the earth .

Now you explain....

How the the sun and moon stay in orbit in the geocentric model. Why don’t they sink to the surface of the earth? Or float off?

Then explained what the firmament is made of.

With all the planet’s in orbit around the sun, retrograde is easily explained.

In the geocentric model, retrograde can only occur if the inner planets actually switch direction to travel backwards. Is that false.

How does the firmament allow retrograde for the inner planets. How does the firmament allow the inner planets to switch direction of travel around the earth in the geocentric model, and then switch direction of travel back again.



posted on Jun, 2 2019 @ 05:50 AM
link   
a reply to: turbonium1

How about you answer to the below first to show your video clip is not lies and flat earth propaganda?

Then explained what the firmament is made of.

How the the sun and moon stay in orbit in the geocentric model. Why don’t they sink to the surface of the earth?

With all the planet’s in orbit around the sun, retrograde is easily explained.

In the geocentric model, retrograde can only occur if the inner planets actually switch direction to travel backwards. Is that false.

How does the firmament allow retrograde for the inner planets. How does the firmament allow the inner planets to switch direction of travel around the earth in the geocentric model, and then switch direction of travel back again.
edit on 2-6-2019 by neutronflux because: Added list



posted on Jun, 2 2019 @ 05:57 AM
link   
a reply to: turbonium1

You


We have real proof of the flat Earth, right here, which anyone can verify, being the instruments on airplanes prove it


No you don’t. Your rant has been totally debunked over and over. You don’t get to disregard the vary real force of gravity to create a false argument for the lie the earth is flat.

Again.



Flat Earth Follies: Planes would have to constantly pitch down to fly!

flatearthinsanity.blogspot.com...

Planes don't fly out 1 mile, jump down 8 inches, and fly some more - that's silly. Planes constantly FLY THE CURVATURE because that is the ONLY line of equipotential gravity!





edit on 2-6-2019 by neutronflux because: Fixed quote



posted on Jun, 2 2019 @ 06:06 AM
link   
a reply to: turbonium1

You


You don't have any proof satellites and the ISS are in 'space', so don't try asking me to prove they are NOT in space, because you have the burden of proving your claim, not the reverse.


The short answer:
Every time I watched satellite TV in the 80’s, and 90’s. and ever time I repositioned our first satellite dish that was 8’ in diameter which was pointed at the southwestern sky to change satellites, I proved the existence of satellites.

The long answer you ignored:
How does the ability to locate, track, spot photograph, listen, tune into passings satellites not prove they exist. I would guess you could even use the transmissions from a satellite to triangulate its position.

What proof do you have Satellites and the international space station you can spot from earth doesn’t exist?

And.....

Besides we know man made objects orbit a spherical earth, orbit the moon, and travel to the moon is possible because of:
Satellite TV
Satellite internet
GPS Satellites
Satellite phones
Satellite weather tracking and surveys
Satellite mapping of earth by radar, thermal imaging, UV light.....
Mirrors left on moon used to measure distance
Hubble space telescopes
Various countries space missions to map the moon
The international space station
Skylab space station
The Mir space station
You can actually see satellites and the international space station from earth
Missions to map and explore Mars
Missions to Mercury, Jupiter, Saturn, Venus, Neptune, Uranus, Pluto, asteroids, comets...........



posted on Jun, 2 2019 @ 06:08 AM
link   
a reply to: turbonium1

What’s it like to be shown every time you post flat earth is a blatant lie?



posted on Jun, 3 2019 @ 06:26 PM
link   
a reply to: neutronflux

This thread is proof that it doesn't effect him in the slightest. He's very devout in his faith, nothing as simple as reality would change that.

Speaking of which turbonium1: Sydney, Polaris, coordinates.



posted on Jun, 4 2019 @ 04:36 AM
link   
whats our conversion rate for FE to GE?

surely we have some converts already or have we lost some globers to the cause ?



posted on Jun, 4 2019 @ 01:35 PM
link   
a reply to: turbonium1



China just bounced a laser off reflectors on the Moon placed by NASA's Apollo 15 mission

gbtimes.com...



posted on Jun, 7 2019 @ 06:18 PM
link   

originally posted by: neutronflux
a reply to: turbonium1

You


We have real proof of the flat Earth, right here, which anyone can verify, being the instruments on airplanes prove it


No you don’t. Your rant has been totally debunked over and over. You don’t get to disregard the vary real force of gravity to create a false argument for the lie the earth is flat.

Again.



Flat Earth Follies: Planes would have to constantly pitch down to fly!

flatearthinsanity.blogspot.com...

Planes don't fly out 1 mile, jump down 8 inches, and fly some more - that's silly. Planes constantly FLY THE CURVATURE because that is the ONLY line of equipotential gravity!
[/quote/]

Inventing something for an invented 'force' doesn't work any better, sorry to say.

The actual instruments on planes measure level flight in atmosphere, as actually level. Same as they measure ascent, or descent, in atmosphere, as actually an ascent, or a descent.

Why would an instrument measure level in atmosphere as something NOT level, for crying out loud? It's ridiculous, and doesn't make any sense, nor does it happen in reality.

There is no pilot taught about 'equipotential gravity', since it doesn't exist, in reality. The instruments measure for level flight, AS level!

How could instruments ever measure for level, if it was NOT really level? That's absolute nonsense!

Planes don't ever measure the surface of Earth, in any way, during flights. If the surface of Earth was curved, how would it be measured from 40,000 feet in air?

If 'gravity' existed, as you claim, and 'equipotential gravity' existed, as you claim, and it could reach out from the Earth's 'core', and made planes follow the curvature of Earth, which measures 'level' on their instruments, but it's really measuring for 'level to curvature of Earth's surface'.....

It's just a bigger pile of nonsense.


Level is measured as level, nothing else.

In air, level is measured as level, nothing else.








edit on 7-6-2019 by turbonium1 because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 7 2019 @ 06:47 PM
link   
a reply to: turbonium1

What are you ranting about.

The short answer:
Every time I watched satellite TV in the 80’s, and 90’s. and ever time I repositioned our first satellite dish that was 8’ in diameter which was pointed at the southwestern sky to change satellites, I proved the existence of satellites.

The long answer you ignored:
How does the ability to locate, track, spot photograph, listen, tune into passings satellites not prove they exist. I would guess you could even use the transmissions from a satellite to triangulate its position.

What proof do you have Satellites and the international space station you can spot from earth doesn’t exist?

And.....

Besides we know man made objects orbit a spherical earth, orbit the moon, and travel to the moon is possible because of:
Satellite TV
Satellite internet
GPS Satellites
Satellite phones
Satellite weather tracking and surveys
Satellite mapping of earth by radar, thermal imaging, UV light.....
Mirrors left on moon used to measure distance
Hubble space telescopes
Various countries space missions to map the moon
The international space station
Skylab space station
The Mir space station
You can actually see satellites and the international space station from earth
Missions to map and explore Mars
Missions to Mercury, Jupiter, Saturn, Venus, Neptune, Uranus, Pluto, asteroids, comets...........



posted on Jun, 7 2019 @ 06:49 PM
link   
a reply to: turbonium1

What do you not get about flat earth being a blatant lie.

What do you not get about man made satellites orbiting the earth and the moon in the vacuum of space?

Hello.
edit on 7-6-2019 by neutronflux because: Fixed



posted on Jun, 7 2019 @ 06:58 PM
link   

originally posted by: neutronflux
a reply to: turbonium1

You


You don't have any proof satellites and the ISS are in 'space', so don't try asking me to prove they are NOT in space, because you have the burden of proving your claim, not the reverse.


The short answer:
Every time I watched satellite TV in the 80’s, and 90’s. and ever time I repositioned our first satellite dish that was 8’ in diameter which was pointed at the southwestern sky to change satellites, I proved the existence of satellites.

The long answer you ignored:
How does the ability to locate, track, spot photograph, listen, tune into passings satellites not prove they exist. I would guess you could even use the transmissions from a satellite to triangulate its position.

What proof do you have Satellites and the international space station you can spot from earth doesn’t exist?

And.....

Besides we know man made objects orbit a spherical earth, orbit the moon, and travel to the moon is possible because of:
Satellite TV
Satellite internet
GPS Satellites
Satellite phones
Satellite weather tracking and surveys
Satellite mapping of earth by radar, thermal imaging, UV light.....
Mirrors left on moon used to measure distance
Hubble space telescopes
Various countries space missions to map the moon
The international space station
Skylab space station
The Mir space station
You can actually see satellites and the international space station from earth
Missions to map and explore Mars
Missions to Mercury, Jupiter, Saturn, Venus, Neptune, Uranus, Pluto, asteroids, comets...........


Confirming the fantasy, is not the same as proving it actually exists.

Gravity has no proof it exists, either. Magical feats of gravity are simply used as excuses, for everything.



posted on Jun, 7 2019 @ 07:01 PM
link   
Why don't you describe those video clips of stars, and planets, if you could?

Are you afraid to speak about them?



posted on Jun, 7 2019 @ 07:43 PM
link   
a reply to: turbonium1



Confirming the fantasy, is not the same as proving it actually exists.


How is living in an area where at the house the only option for Internet or getting HBO is through subscribing to a satellite service and correctly aligning the satellite dish with the correct satellite in earth’s orbit.

How is tracking, seeing the International space station pass over head as scheduled as it orbits the earth, people taking pictures of the ISS with telescopes a fantasy?
edit on 7-6-2019 by neutronflux because: Added and fixed

edit on 7-6-2019 by neutronflux because: Added and fixed



posted on Jun, 7 2019 @ 07:47 PM
link   
a reply to: turbonium1

Your the one that will not stand for their own fantasy and answer to...

How the the sun and moon stay in orbit in the geocentric model. Why don’t they sink to the surface of the earth? Or float off?

Then explained what the firmament is made of.

With all the planet’s in orbit around the sun, retrograde is easily explained.

In the geocentric model, retrograde can only occur if the inner planets actually switch direction to travel backwards. Is that false.

How does the firmament allow retrograde for the inner planets. How does the firmament allow the inner planets to switch direction of travel around the earth in the geocentric model, and then switch direction of travel back again.

If you cannot take your flat earth seriously enough to answer its most fundamental concepts, in the context your questions are always replied to, why would I care about a video you post. Especially when flat earth is a blatant lie, and you post repeated falsehoods. You killed your credibility, deal with its consequences.
edit on 7-6-2019 by neutronflux because: Added and fixed




top topics



 
14
<< 102  103  104    106  107  108 >>

log in

join